Skip to main content

Following Galaxy Note 7 debacle, Samsung’s battery-making arm isn’t doing very well

Samsung may have washed its hands of the mess that was the Galaxy Note 7, but the company’s eponymous Samsung SDI affiliate, which was primarily responsible for supplying the battery that was at the center of the problem, is still dealing with the aftereffects, reports Reuters.

According to an unnamed source, Samsung’s largest in-house supplier is trying to assure its customers, which include Apple and other outfits, that its batteries are safe to use. SDI might not have made headlines on its own, but with Samsung’s decision to stop using its batteries in the Note 7, plenty of indirect blame was placed on the subsidiary for the phone’s battery woes.

Recommended Videos

“Since the first recall, we’ve had many inquiries from our clients, including Apple, asking whether batteries used in their products are safe,” said the source, who was reportedly involved in the development of the Note 7’s battery at SDI.

From that point onward, things have not gone too well for SDI, with the subsidiary losing around a fifth of its market value since the Note 7 debacle. For a supplier trying to broaden its wares to include electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy storage systems, the last thing SDI wants is a bad reputation in the eyes of current and potential clients.

SDI also does not want to second-guess its decisions, something the unnamed person alleges is what happened within the supplier.

“We are also asking ourselves whether we should have done it (the Note 7 battery) this way, or whether there could have been other ways,” said the source.

SDI’s issues are not just limited to the Note 7’s battery, however. Having close ties to Samsung has helped both SDI itself and Samsung, with the former gaining visibility while the latter has gained an advantage over competing companies. However, there are questions regarding Samsung’s in-house supply chain and whether it can support the growing demands of a company that has grown exponentially over the years.

Samsung has not pinpointed the problem with the Note 7, though it certainly seems that SDI is bearing the brunt of the outcome, at least internally.

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
5 ways the Galaxy A53 5G is a good value, and 1 way it isn’t
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and Galaxy A33 5G blue and peach colors.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is your way into Galaxy phone ownership without having to splurge on a phone like the expensive (but admittedly brilliant) Galaxy S22 Ultra. The newly released smartphone costs $450 which is far more affordable, and we think it's shaping up to offer good value.

Let's look at the ways the Galaxy A53 5G delivers this value, in an effort to help you make the decision whether to pick this phone up or not. Then, at the end, we'll talk about the one area the Galaxy A53 is losing out on compared to the competition.
Lower price
Despite a new processor and other hardware improvements, the Galaxy A53 5G is cheaper than its predecessor, the Galaxy A52 5G. You pay $450 for the new phone compared to $500 for the old model, or 399 British pounds in the U.K. compared to 450 pounds. While most manufacturers attempt to keep the same price with a new model, it’s rare to see the price go down. It’s part of why we consider the A53 5G good value, even after only a short time using it.
Years of software support
You'll spend less buying the new Galaxy A53 5G than before, and for that lower price, you'll also get longer software support this time around. Samsung has committed to delivering four years of Android updates and five years of security updates to the Galaxy A53 5G, a year longer than it did for the Galaxy A52 5G. It’s the same software update commitment you get if you purchase a Galaxy S22 series phone.

Read more
Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S8 shows why Android 12L isn’t enough
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra with keyboard.

Android tablets have usually fallen behind iPads and Windows tablets when it comes to offering good tablet experiences. With Android 12L, Google is taking that particular bull by the horns. The update will roll out to Pixel phones starting next month, but Samsung's recent announcement of the Galaxy Tab S8 casts a shadow over what should be a revival for Google's tablet ambitions because it shows that the problem with Android tablets isn't really with the interface.
What's Android 12L?
To quickly recap, Google last year announced Android 12L, an initiative the company is using to make Android a better experience on tablets and foldables. The company will continue this work through Android 13 and has hopes for app developers to step in line and create apps that would work better with Android going forward. The big issue here is that Android 12L is redundant for the most part -- and the Tab S8 is a reminder of that.

Android 12L, as far as focusing on bigger screen devices goes, amounts to pretty much a user interface revamp. There's a new multi-pane interface for the lock screen and the notification center, and there's support for a dock for productivity scenarios. But none of this actually fixes problems that exist for users. If you've done any shopping for Android tablets recently, you'll notice that companies like Samsung that actually sell Android tablets have pretty much always had their device software competently tablet-optimized.
Android tablets already have optimized interfaces
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPGzX_y8ccM

Read more
The Samsung Galaxy S22 isn’t charging as fast as it should
Galaxy S22 Plus charging port.

The Galaxy S22 series comes with two types of chargers, 25-watt adapters for the base S22 model and 45 watts for the S22+ and the S22 Ultra. However, tests with both adapters seem to indicate that they don't really make a difference to overall charging time.

When comparing the time it takes to reach a full charge with all models in the S22 line, it becomes apparent that spending the extra cash on a 45W adapter is a complete waste as all devices take the same amount of time, according to tests done by GSMArena.

Read more