Skip to main content

Samsung wants to take its patent battle with Apple to the Supreme Court

When Samsung finally agreed to pay Apple $548 million in a technology patent dispute last Friday, some thought it might finally signal the beginning of the end of the two companies’ patent battle. However, that sentiment couldn’t be more untrue, as Samsung wants to take its patent case to the Supreme Court, reports Recode.

Samsung may have agreed to the $548 million settlement, but the company argues that the verdict finding infringement was incorrect since the jury wasn’t properly informed about how design patents should be understood, an argument that can be seen as a common issue in patent cases. In addition, Samsung doesn’t agree with how design patent damages are calculated, contending that in a patent infringement case, the victimized company should not be permitted to recoup all the money the offending company made on the affected products, where the patents at issue comprised only a portion of those products.

Recommended Videos

“Samsung is escalating this case because it believes that the way the laws were interpreted is not in line with modern times,” said Samsung. “If the current legal precedent stands, it could diminish innovation, stifle competition, pave the way for design patent troll litigation, and negatively impact the economy and consumers.”

Just because Samsung escalated its patent case with Apple to the Supreme Court doesn’t mean the company will get its way, however, as the justices in the United States’ highest court can choose not to move forward with the case. If the justices decide to do so, however, Samsung and Apple will each file briefs on the merits of the case, and be given 30 minutes to make oral arguments.

Even if the Supreme Court doesn’t move forward with the patent dispute, Samsung and Apple will still meet in court sometime next year to talk about an additional $382 million in packaging materials. In addition, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is investigating some of the design patents at the center of the case and will determine whether they are valid or not, a decision that could affect Apple’s chances of truly coming out victorious in the dispute.

Williams Pelegrin
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
It’s time for Apple, Samsung and Google to solve the eSIM problem
Nano SIM card in SIM card tray from iPhone 14 Pro Max.

When Apple launched the new iPhone 16e on Wednesday, the Apple Store in every region displayed one thing under connectivity: eSIM. There was no mention of a physical SIM, and I had a waking nightmare that Apple had quietly pulled the plug, and every iPhone 16e globally would be sold as an eSIM-only model.

A quick search — and a look at the photos — confirmed that this hadn’t happened, but my reaction kickstarted a thought about eSIMs, their promise (and what we were promised), and the current state of eSIMs globally. I’ve been traveling for the past month, and eSIMs are an absolute mess. The potential was immense, but it goes against carriers’ interests to make it any easier, but there is a solution.

Read more
Samsung may be about to score a double victory over Apple — here’s how
The Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's screens.

The latest Power On newsletter from Bloomberg journalist Mark Gurman asserts that Samsung is ahead of Apple in both artificial intelligence (AI) and with its ultra-thin phone efforts. Does that actually matter, though?

Well, yes and no. While I think being first is an empty accolade if it’s not backed up by quality, Apple can’t afford to be too late to the party -- particularly in the case of AI.

Read more
Samsung and Apple’s race to slim phones might skirt the sticker shock
Samsung Galaxy S24 and iPhone 16 Pro side by side.

Over the course of the past few months, numerous outlets have reported on Samsung and Apple’s plans to make “slim” phones. Naturally, one would think that an “innovation tax” is imminent, but it seems these skinny phones won’t deliver a price shock.

In Apple’s case, the alleged iPhone 17 Air will replace the iPhone Plus model, which apparently had an unexpectedly low sales run. Apple, therefore, has to fill the Plus gap with an Air model this year without making any big changes to the pricing structure.

Read more