Skip to main content

Supreme Court declines to hear Oracle’s copyright case against Google

apple samsung supreme court shutterstock
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Way back in 2010, enterprise company Oracle accused Google of lifting copyright-protected code from Java, the programming language it acquired from Sun Microsystems, to design Android. A San Francisco trial judge disagreed but a higher court sided with Oracle, ruling that Google’s use of Java’s application programming interfaces (APIs) constituted infringement. The Mountain View-based search giant appealed that decision, but was dealt another blow today: the Supreme Court declined to hear its case, effectively letting the preceding court’s decision stand.

The outcome of Oracle v. Google, as the case is known, has wide-ranging implications for software development. At issue is whether Google’s incorporation of 37 Java APIs — lists of publicly-accessible functions in software that programmers can use to build things — in Android are “fair use,” or sufficiently transformative enough that copyright rules don’t apply. Oracle says they aren’t — it alleges that APIs, like a book or movie or TV show, are specific enough to copyright. Google argues otherwise, asserting that APIs are merely ideas, not dictum, for interacting with a type of software.

Oracle, ideally, is seeking a license from Google for its use of Java APIs. Although Java is an open source programming language and Google gives its Android operating system away for free, Oracle contends that, like a trademarked logo on a bumper sticker, it’s entitled to payment when companies make use of its intellectual property. It’s an argument not entirely without merit — Google, Oracle notes, is the only major commercial user of Java technology that doesn’t have a license. (The Dalvik virtual machine, the engine responsible for running Android apps in older versions of the operating system, is an implementation of Java.)

If Oracle prevails, the precedent isn’t too difficult to imagine: “free” software could become basically useless to developers who refuse to fork over usage fees. Projects like Linux would be on the hook for any APIs which duplicate functions in commercial software. Cloud computing storage platforms could be at risk — many are based heavily on APIs developed by Amazon. And open frameworks that supply tools as simple as dialogue windows, menus, and buttons for apps could justifiably shutter access to developers who don’t pay the de facto subscription.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, the case returns to a lower court where both sides will argue the “fair use” issue — the appeals court in May ruled that the Java APIs had an “overall structure, sequence, and organization” unique enough to warrant intellectual protection. Whether the court will buy the conceit of Google’s defense — that programming languages like Java are “open and interoperable” — this time around is unclear, but there’s a lot riding on the final judgement. In a brief submitted to the court, the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes that a ruling in favor of Oracle could give companies holding API copyrights “unprecedented and dangerous power” over developers.

Editors' Recommendations

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
The best Google Pixel 2 XL cases and covers
The best Google Pixel 2 XL cases and covers for protection and style
Best Google Pixel 2 XL cases

Google’s Pixel 2 XL smartphone sports a stunning 6-inch screen set into an aluminum body with that signature glass inlay on the back. It’s a stylish look, but if you want to avoid chips and dings in the metal and scratches and cracks in the glass, then you better get some protection. These are our picks of the best Google Pixel 2 XL cases so far. You may also want to check out the best Pixel 2 XL screen protectors.
Our top picks
After trying out a lot of different Pixel 2 XL cases, these are our three top picks that we recommend. They all have something to offer that you won't find elsewhere.
Carved Traveler Wood Case

Everyone loves the look and feel of natural wood, but it's a difficult material to use well for phone cases. Carved manages to do it by taking a practical, flexible, black plastic shell and sticking wooden panels with various eye-catching artworks engraved or painted onto the back. These cases are primarily about the look and we've found they rarely fail to draw admiring glances and questions. The shell is a perfect fit with ridged sides that enhance grip and generous cutouts. The only weakness is the thin button covers, which don't make it as easy as we'd like to find the buttons without looking. We're glad to find that the squeezable Active Edge feature still works with this case on. This isn't a really rugged case, though it will offer some protection against drops from pocket height, and there's a slight lip to safeguard the screen.

Read more
Google pits design teams against each other to create next winning Pixel phone
Google Pixel 3 XL review

Google is rumored to have at least three design teams working on its future smartphones, and it’s a competition between them all to produce the final design. This comes just days before Google is expected to reveal the new Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL devices, which leaks show to be midrange smartphones with designs that are similar to the flagship Pixel phones released at the end of 2018.

The similar designs may turn out to be a disappointment to some, as the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL are hardly regarded as the most attractive devices of their time. Google’s apparent plan to have multiple design teams working in competition could be a reaction to the lukewarm reception to the controversial design decisions taken to create Pixel phones up until now. When we say controversial, we’re really talking about the notch, and the bezels.

Read more
Huawei P30 Pro vs. Google Pixel 3 XL: Which camera powerhouse reigns supreme?
Huawei P30 Pro

The Huawei P30 and P30 Pro boast top-tier specs and a ton of camera tech. The P30 Pro may well redefine what to expect from smartphone cameras given the fact that it boasts a quad-lens main camera, a 32-megapixel front-facing camera, and a ton of artificial intelligence to process everything. But another phone redefined mobile photography last year -- the Google Pixel, the biggest of which is the Google Pixel 3 XL. How does the Huawei P30 Pro compare to the Pixel 3 XL? We put the two head to head to find out.

Huawei P30 Pro
Google Pixel 3 XL

Read more