Skip to main content

Godzilla review

As a film, franchise and ferocious force of nature, Godzilla is bigger than any one man. It’s bigger than thousands of men combined, in fact.

This might be a problem, depending on your view of the destruction.

Godzilla, directed by Gareth Edwards (Monsters) and produced by Legendary Pictures, the same studio that brought last summer’s monster-sized Pacific Rim, is less interested in the heart of humanity than it is in its sweeping decimation. It’s a film that all but abandons the need for character development, the need to individualize its human face, opting instead for a wider view of monstrous assaults on mankind.

But it doesn’t start this way. In its opening scenes, Godzilla is as personal as it gets. It’s 1999, and Joseph Brody, a Japan-based nuclear engineer played by Bryan Cranston, senses an anomaly at his power plant. His concerns fall on deaf ears, and it’s up to Joe and his wife, fellow Janjira Power Plant employee Sandra (Juliette Binoche), to dig deeper. Their investigation takes a tragic turn when an apparent meltdown at the reactor claims not only Sandra’s life, but the lives of countless others, rendering the surrounding area completely uninhabitable forever more.

Recommended Videos

Size matters, especially when rendered at such an impressive scale — but what good is size without a heart?

Joe doesn’t buy it. Fifteen years after the Janjira meltdown, he still grieves his wife’s death and his inability to avert disaster. And he doesn’t accept the term “meltdown,” not in connection to this incident. He believes something else caused the destruction in Janjira — and, with the help of his son Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), a soldier and demolitions expert, Joe discovers that he’s right: It wasn’t a meltdown, but a different M-word, that caused the catastrophe.

With that monstrous discovery, Godzilla changes. Its interests shift away from the human story to the creature promised in its title. There’s a very clear distinction between the first and second movements of the film: In movement one, Godzilla tells the story about a man seeking redemption and searching for answers to questions that have haunted him for a decade and change. In movement two, Godzilla plays out from a cold distance, populated by characters without purpose that, more often than not, simply stand around and watch the action unfold, helpless to contribute anything at all.

Even as the second act shifts away from emphasizing the human cast, it shies away from fully revealing Godzilla and his enemies, the Massive Unidentified Terrestrial Organisms, awesomely and repeatedly referred to as “MUTOs.” The MUTOs get more unflinching screen-time than the gargantuan Godzilla himself, rampaging through Hawaii and Las Vegas and other locations for reasons that aren’t fully revealed until much later in the film. As for Godzilla, he’s rarely seen as more than a tail cutting through the ocean, a foot stomping through Honolulu, until the final showdown that unleashes the King of Monsters in all his atomic breath-barfing glory.

Godzilla movie review
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Edwards’ decision to restrain Godzilla and the MUTOs, to keep their presence in check until the great release of the finale, is admirable and bold. If it works, it’s thanks to the sheer size and scale of these monsters, compared to the ant-sized men and women scurrying about their feet. You fully buy into these havoc-wreaking creatures and their ability to cut a swath of destruction through the world; you don’t need to see them in their entirety to appreciate their capacity for damage.

The problem is the characters, if you can even call them that. If Edwards and Legendary want their Godzilla movie to keep the destruction in full view but the monsters at arm’s length until the final act, then it ought to be a movie populated by compelling characters. There is precisely one compelling character in all of Godzilla. Cranston brings the weight of the world to Brody, filling the failed engineer’s heart with rage and regret. It’s one of the best performances a modern blockbuster has offered up in years — no surprise, given Cranston’s considerable talents.

But he’s all alone, surrounded by underwritten characters, played by capable actors who just barely show up. Proven pros like David Strathairn and Ken Watanabe do their best as two of the men tasked with navigating the MUTO situation, but they’re ultimately given nothing to do. As Ford’s wife Elle, Elizabeth Olsen is absolutely wasted, surviving on her own charisma, and nothing more. And Ford, the alleged protagonist of the piece, is the weakest link of all; Taylor-Johnson is sleepy-eyed and unengaged as he works his way back to San Francisco to reunite with a family the viewer never really cares about.

As Godzilla shifts from character-centric to monster-mode, Cranston’s Brody is marginalized at best, forgotten at worst. The reason for the shift makes sense, but it’s hard to go there through the guy who makes everyone else look like paper mâché.

Conclusion

Godzilla creates colossal damage on a grander canvas than many summer movies in recent memory. It makes bold choices to withhold the monsters at the heart of the tale, so that when they’re revealed in full, they land with maximum impact. But these triumphs come at the expense of characters that aren’t even worthy of being described as “two-dimensional.” The lone exception is Cranston as Joe Brody, who is sadly sidelined once Godzilla rampages onward to focus on matters bigger than any one man. Size matters, especially when rendered at such an impressive scale — but what good is size without a heart?

(Media © Warner Bros. and Legendary Pictures)

Josh Wigler
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Josh Wigler is a freelance entertainment reporter who has been published by Comic Book Resources, Comics Alliance…
10 most popular movies of 2024 so far, ranked
A woman and Betelgeuse stand next to each other with confused looks on their faces.

It looked pretty bleak for the 2024 theatrical movie slate in the first five months of the year. Dune: Part Two did its part, becoming a hit domestically and internationally. However, many blockbusters from January to May either flopped or underperformed. Those disappointments include Argylle, The Fall Guy, and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.

However, Bad Boys: Ride or Die came out the first weekend of June and completely turned the tide. One week later, Inside Out 2 opened to historic numbers on its way to becoming the highest-grossing animated movie ever. Deadpool & Wolverine proved Marvel's cold streak was over with a monster box office haul. Twisters and Despicable Me 2 also found large audiences and performed well in theaters. Despite the slow start, 2024 has had a slew of hits. Below are the 10 most popular movies of 2024 ranked by domestic gross.

Read more
This new slow-burn thriller features one of 2024’s best performances
A group of cardinals sit together in Conclave.

Conclave doesn't just feel like an Agatha Christie mystery -- it also begins like one. The film's opening moments follow its beleaguered protagonist, Thomas Cardinal Lawrence (Ralph Fiennes), as he hurriedly makes his way through the streets of Rome. When he finally arrives at his destination, he is shocked and saddened to discover multiple cardinals gathered around the body of the newly dead pope. Arrangements are quickly made for Lawrence, Dean of the College of Cardinals, to lead and oversee a papal conclave to elect his former superior's replacement.

CONCLAVE - Official Trailer 2 [HD] - Only In Theaters October 25

Read more
10 years ago, the most acclaimed superhero movie ever won awards and frustrated audiences
Birdman yells at the screen in Birdman.

The 2010s were a notoriously uneven decade for Best Picture winners -- consider that the trainwreck that is Green Book and the masterpiece that is Parasite won the award back-to-back. Half of the winners were incredibly inspired -- 12 Years a Slave, Spotlight, Moonlight, and The Shape of Water -- while the other half ranged from the forgettable (Argo, The Artist) to the outright mediocre (The King's Speech). And then there's Birdman. From the singular, highly idiosyncratic, and often questionable mind of Alejandro González Iñárritu, Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) is a dark comedy-drama about a washed-up actor, mainly known for a superhero role, trying to stage a comeback with a Broadway adaptation of a Raymond Carver story.

At face value, Birdman looks like a stylistic and technical exercise from one of cinema's most visually interesting yet polarizing auteurs. Unlike many movies, which have deeper layers compared to the first impression they give away, Birdman reinforces it: what you see is what you get, for better and worse. On its 10th anniversary, let's look back at Birdman's unique legacy, discussing how it reshaped the careers of its two leading players -- Iñárritu and Michael Keaton -- and how it became, arguably, the single most eyebrow-raising Best Picture winner of the new millennium.
'I'm trying to do something important.'

Read more