Skip to main content

Does vaping cause seizures? Here’s what could be the culprit


The Food and Drug Administration is continuing to seek reports people who experience seizures after e-cigarette use, the agency said Wednesday. Since 2010, the FDA received 127 reports of seizures or other neurological symptoms, but research is still ongoing as the FDA doesn’t have enough information to link the events.

About 90 of these reports had come since April, when the agency first put out the call for Americans to report if they believed they had a seizure or other neurological issue following e-cigarette use. At the time, the reports received between 2010 and 2019 had no clear pattern to determine a cause.

Recommended Videos

Acting FDA commissioner Ned Sharpless said in a statement that additional reports and more detailed information on reported incidents could help the agency identify risk factors. They also hope to uncover what exactly is causing the seizures in the first place and if preexisting medical conditions may be to blame.

“We’re committed to monitoring this issue closely and taking additional steps as necessary to protect the public, especially our nation’s youth, from the dangers of e-cigarettes and other tobacco products,” Sharpless said.

To be clear, not all of the agency’s 127 reports were for seizures: the FDA said that some of the reports were for other neurological issues such as fainting and tremors. It also cautioned that the additional reports received don’t necessarily indicate an increase in “frequency or prevalence” of such issues.

But could the cause of these health problems be something simple?

Nicotine is dangerous in large quantities

Traditional cigarettes and cigars are finite. You light them up, smoke them, and put them out. They also have a finite amount of nicotine.

Vaping is different. Using the popular Juul vape as an example, one 5% cartridge roughly has the same amount of nicotine as a pack of cigarettes.

But unlike cigarettes, with vaping you aren’t ever “finished.” You can keep puffing and puffing, not realizing you may technically be getting the same amount of nicotine as you would chain-smoking.

There’s also another critical factor to consider: absorption. E-liquid delivers nicotine to the bloodstream far more effectively than cigarette smoke does, possibly twice as fast, studies indicate. With some vapers puffing so often, is too much nicotine the culprit?

Experts warned about nicotine overdose for years as the popularity of e-cigarettes exploded. Some of the symptoms in the FDA reports are also symptoms of overdose, which makes this a possible explanation.

In the early stages of overdose, symptoms are mild. Nausea, dizziness, anxiety, and tremors may occur. But as more nicotine is absorbed, symptoms can get far worse, including seizures, loss of consciousness, and even respiratory failure.

Smokers and some vapers might have experienced the effects of too much nicotine too quick: the so-called “nicotine buzz” is just that.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

More study is needed, experts say

While the number of cases is significant, with millions of e-cigarette users, it is a tiny sample. The FDA will need to continue to study the reports it receives to make a judgment on whether nicotine overdoses are to blame for these issues.

Dr. Jun-Xu Li, professor of pharmacology and toxicology at the University of Buffalo’s Jacobs School of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, warned of jumping to conclusions too quickly.

Li told DigitalTrends that the FDA reports are random and don’t happen in the controlled environment of a lab. “We don’t have enough data to support or dispute the negatives,” he said. “We need a large study.”

An actual overdose on nicotine would be very difficult to do on purpose, Li said, as the increasingly adverse side effects act as a deterrent. While Li did confirm seizures are a potential side effect of ultra-high levels of nicotine, he added it was “impossible to vape too much in a short period of time.”

But some could be more sensitive to higher nicotine levels. “Is it possible that a very small set [of the population] are super sensitive? Of course,” he argued.

Either way, we are bound to find out sooner rather than later. The FDA isn’t alone in researching vaping: Li said there is “lots of research” on the topic happening right now.

“They want to know more,” Li said. “[Vaping’s popularity is] so widespread.”

Ed Oswald
For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more