Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. News

How Facebook is profiting off the 2016 presidential election

Add as a preferred source on Google

By November of this year, one candidate will have won the 2016 presidential election while many others will lose, but Facebook will have profited. American elections, which continue to grow more expensive year after year, have recently learned the power of social media when it comes to their advertising strategies, and now candidates on both sides of the field are spending outrageous sums of money through the social network to get the word out and bring people to the polls. Just how much are they spending? According to the Guardian, donors affiliated with Republican candidate Ted Cruz are spending some $10,000 per day on Facebook “placement,” but really, that’s just the tip of the iceberg. With a wide field and crunch time nearing, those numbers are just a sliver of the amount that Facebook is making off of politics.

It is estimated that by the time the dust settles and President Obama ends his tenure in the White House, Democrats, Republicans, and everyone in between will have spent around $10 billion to get their candidate into the seat of power. And a key vehicle on the road to Washington, undoubtedly, is the ubiquitous Facebook. While presidential candidates are unable to track individual voters, they can upload email lists, voter files (which include political habits, real names, addresses, and phone numbers) to Facebook’s advertising database. So if you feel like Donald Trump is just following you around on social media, he actually might be. Or at least, he has the capacity to do so.

Recommended Videos

Using Facebook and other digital media during an election cycle is nothing new — indeed, it was Barack Obama’s technological savviness back in 2008 that helped land him in the White House. But Facebook’s reach today dwarfs that of the Facebook of last decade, and the power that Mark Zuckerberg’s social platform maintains seems to grow day by day. “Facebook is the easiest and most effective platform,” said Zac Moffatt, the top digital strategist for Romney’s 2012 campaign. “They are so much more valuable than they were eight years ago.”

Candidates can use Facebook to target voters (and Facebook users) on hot-button issues from immigration to abortion to firework sales. And more frightening still, the Guardian reports, in some cases, campaigns are looking to find voters individually online using highly specified models.

So how much money is Facebook making off the presidential race? Digital ad spending is expected to surpass $1 billion in 2016, according to research by Borrell Associates, and while it’s unclear how large of a chunk Facebook will take, it’s safe to assume that it’s not chump change.

“Facebook has been a game-changer for our campaign and for the entire electoral process,” Marianne Copenhaver, creative director for Senator Rand Paul’s campaign told the Guardian. “We now have the ability to go live directly to the voters and reach thousands of people instantly.” And that may be the scariest thing of all.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more