Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook gives marketers sleepless nights with more ad metrics blunders

Add as a preferred source on Google

Facebook has revealed yet more errors in regards to its counting of ad metrics. The latest set of miscalculations marks the third time in three months the company has admitted to getting its analytics wrong. It’s enough to raise doubts among even the staunchest of Facebook marketers.

This time around, the errors affected Live videos, and the social network’s like and share counts. The former saw the platform misallocate the viewer “reactions” a live-stream was receiving (which occur in real-time and during video replays). Instead of counting the multiple reactions per unique user in the “reactions on posts” metric, the platform mistakenly lumped those insights in to the “reactions from shares of posts” section. Facebook insists that “that total counts were and are correct; some of them were just captured in the wrong reporting column when broken out.”

Recommended Videos

As a result of the blunder, the stats for Live video reactions are going to be impacted in a major way going forward. From mid-December, Facebook’s fix for the issue will see “reactions on post” metrics increase by 500 percent on average, whereas “reactions from shares of post” will inevitably decrease by 25 percent on average. Facebook did not clarify when exactly this so-called “misallocation” began, or when it was first spotted.

live-video-posts-12-6
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Facebook Live has found considerable success, thanks to the company’s promotional campaigns and its multimillion-dollar media content deals. Facebook has also boasted of higher engagement rates for videos throughout the year, which led to the introduction of a News Feed update that gave live-streams more prominence. However, this particular discrepancy is a blow to the format on Facebook. Add to that the fact that Facebook’s push to make its metrics reporting more transparent was kicked off by miscalculations that affected video viewing times, and a worrying trend begins to emerge for advertisers.

The other error reported on Friday concerns a difference between the metrics count for the “like” and “share” buttons via Facebook’s Graph application programming interface (API) and its mobile app’s URL search bar. The Facebook plugins in question count the number of likes of a web URL off Facebook, the number of shares of a URL off Facebook, and the number of likes and comments on stories on Facebook about a URL. The company said the following in regards to the error: “We are working to resolve this issue so that the Like and Share button metrics and our mobile search query metrics match up, and we will notify partners as soon as we have an update.” Again, it is unclear when this mix-up began, and when it was first spotted.

Additionally, Facebook also announced it is updating its estimated reach methodology to help advertisers gauge the number of people that will potentially see and interact with their campaigns. “We’re improving our methodology for sampling and extrapolating potential audience sizes,” Facebook wrote. “This will help to provide a more accurate estimate for a given target audience and to better account for audiences across multiple platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and Audience Network).”

To keep up with Facebook’s metrics reporting , you can follow its “FYI” blog posts on the topic here.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more