Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. News

Twitter takes Turkish government to court over ‘terrorist propaganda’ fine

Add as a preferred source on Google

Updated 01/11/2016 3.00 p.m. (PT) by Saqib Shah: In the ongoing dispute between Turkey and Twitter, the latter has taken the matter to court.

report claims that Twitter’s aim is to get the penalty, regarding its delayed removal of what the government deemed “terrorist propaganda,” annulled. The case was filed in a court in the Turkish capital of Ankara last week. 

Recommended Videos

Twitter currently faces a temporary ban in Turkey after it failed to pay a fine of 150,000 Turkish lira ($51,000) set by the Turkish government.

Turkish minister Binali Yildirim has said that the government will “take measures” against the social platform.

The fine was the first of its kind and it is now likely that the Turkish government will resort to temporarily banning the service, as it has done so in the past.

Twitter did not reply to Digital Trends requests for comment.

Original text: Turkey has issued Twitter a fine relating to the social network’s failure to take down what the government refers to as “terrorist propaganda.” The action is a first for the country, which has had controversial brushes with the site on numerous occasions in the past.

Twitter will be forced to pay a fine of 150,000 Turkish lira ($51,000) following a notice by the country’s communications watchdog, reports Reuters.

Although the Turkish government has not released an official statement, it is thought that the content in question dates back to March.

The controversy originally stemmed from images that were uploaded to Twitter during a hostage crisis that saw a prosecutor and two hostages killed, according to CNBC. A Marxist revolutionary group thought to be behind the attack posted images and statements online, threatening to kill the prosecutor, Mehmet Selim Kiraz, who later died of his injuries following a police shootout intended to free him. At the time, Turkey had banned live TV coverage of the incident, citing security concerns.

The Turkish government had warned both Facebook and Twitter to take down images posted by the group (including photos of the prosecutor held at gunpoint). Facebook managed to swiftly do so, but Twitter’s failure to act quickly enough led to the fine. Although Turkey has blocked social networks in the past, this is the first time a platform has been fined.

Turkey’s turbulent relationship with Twitter has seen the platform repeatedly stray into the government’s firing line. It was first blocked (along with Facebook) following the incident in question, and then taken down prior to local elections for publishing corruption allegations against Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ruling party.

Unlike other nations, which are putting pressure on social networks to combat terrorism, Turkey has been standoffish in its approach to social media. Earlier this year, it issued a court order to 171 websites to remove “visual material” related to a deadly bombing in the Turkish city of Suruç. Turkish law dictates that companies which receive a gag order against certain content have four hours to remove it, after which they are subject to being blocked.

Twitter has not issued a statement on the current fine.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Meta used AI to make your Instagram feed harder to quit
Meta says its latest AI recommendation sytems are keeping people on Instagram longer by serving up more relevant Reels and Feed posts.
Instagram open on iPhone

Caught yourself scrolling on Instagram a lot longer lately? You're not imagining it. Meta just told investors what's driving that trend, and AI is at the center of it.

During its second-quarter earnings call, Meta said time spent on Instagram grew by double digits year over year after rolling out new AI-powered recommendation systems. According to the company, the biggest gains came from improvements to how it recommends Reels and other public content, making it easier to surface videos people are more likely to watch.

Read more
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more