Skip to main content

We don’t pay women less, Google fires back in response to Department of Labor findings

Google's VP of People Operations authors blog post about firm's focus on pay equity

top tech stories 12 08 2017 google headquarters hq
Google is none too pleased with a new report from the U.S. Department of Labor claiming the company displays “systemic compensation disparities.” On Friday, Janette Wipper, a regional director of the federal agency, said it found “compensation disparities against women pretty much across the entire workforce.” The findings come as part of a continuing investigation against the tech giant, which is accused of violating federal employment laws due to salary inequities between genders.

The Silicon Valley company disputed the findings. A spokesperson told TechCrunch, “We vehemently disagree with Ms. Whipper’s claim. Every year, we do a comprehensive and robust analysis of pay across genders and we have found no gender pay gap. Other than making an unfounded statement which we heard for the first time in court, the DoL hasn’t provided any data, or shared its methodology.”

Related Videos

And on Tuesday, Google’s vice president of people operations, Eileen Naughton, authored a blog post outlining the company’s focus on pay equity. Noting that Google publicly shared its top-level analysis of the pay gap (and how to combat it) in 2016, Naughton noted that the tech giant was “quite surprised when [the DoL] accused us of not compensating women fairly.” Writing that the assertion lacked “supporting data or methodology,” Naughton further argued that Google’s own annual analysis is “extremely scientific and robust,” and that its results have been entirely antithetical to those from the government agency.

According to Google, the company reevaluates its employees compensation every year in a gender-blind manner, taking into consideration the role, job level, job location, and current and recent performance ratings. Then, Google uses its pay equity model to examine employees within the same job categories, and “analyzes their compensation to confirm that the adjusted amount shows no statistically significant differences between men’s and women’s compensation,” Naughton explained. The conclusion in 2016 was that there was no gender pay gay, Google said. “Nevertheless, if individual employees are concerned, or think there are unique factors at play, or want a more individualized assessment, we dive deeper and make any appropriate corrections.”

Janet Herold, regional solicitor for the DoL, doesn’t seem convinced by the tech company’s denial. In an interview with the Guardian, she noted, “The investigation is not complete, but at this point the department has received compelling evidence of very significant discrimination against women in the most common positions at Google headquarters … The government’s analysis at this point indicates that discrimination against women in Google is quite extreme, even in this industry.”

Google has been embroiled in a legal battle with the DoL since January, in which the Department has asked the company to turn over job and salary history of employees. Google has refused to comply with these requests, however, and while a spokesperson said at the time that Google had provided “hundreds of thousands of records” to the government, it would appear that the DoL is not satisfied with the firm’s compliance.

The legal battle is clearly far from over; on Friday, one of Google’s lawyers, Lisa Barnett Sween, called the DoL’s request for documentation unconstitutional, and a “fishing expedition that has absolutely no relevance to the compliance review.”

Article updated on 04-11-2017 by Lulu Chang: Added news of Google’s latest blog post focusing on pay equity. 

Editors' Recommendations

Google eliminated that ‘don’t be evil’ motto
warrant google mass strada

Google Office Strada

Google is no longer telling its employees not to be evil.

Read more
IBM breaks law by allegedly firing older workers for young ones, report says
deep learning

An investigation into IBM's hiring and firing practices revealed that the company reportedly violated discrimination laws by targeting older workers. The revelation stems from ProPublica, which reviewed internal company documents, public records, and legal filings while also gathering information from more than 1,000 former IBM employees through questionnaires and one-on-one interviews. 
"ProPublica estimates that in the past five years alone, IBM has eliminated more than 20,000 American employees ages 40 and over, about 60 percent of its estimated total U.S. job cuts during those years," ProPublica reports. 
IBM's goal, it seems, is to flush out its older workforce and fill the void with fresher faces to reflect its younger "fiercest competitors." According to the findings, IBM supposedly laid off older workers due to "out of date" skillsets, only to re-hire them as contractors to perform the same duties at a lower pay and no benefits.  
Even more, older employees targeted for layoffs were encouraged to apply for other positions and train their replacements although managers from the other departments were advised not to even hire them. IBM also allegedly "took steps" to boost resignations and firings so they're not counted as layoffs and fall under the required public disclosure.  
"[IBM] denied older workers information the law says they need in order to decide whether they’ve been victims of age bias and required them to sign away the right to go to court or join with others to seek redress," the report states. 
One former IBM employee who came forward for ProPublica's report is New York-based digital marketing strategist Marjorie Madfis. She worked at IBM for 17 years and found herself without a job for no apparent reason. She was 57 at the time of her layoff and joined by six other members of her nine-member team, all women in their 40s and 50s. The remaining two unaffected by the layoffs were younger men.
Another former IBM worker, Brian Paulson, served the company for 18 years. His performance as a senior manager was reportedly exemplary, but he was laid off due to "performance" issues without any real explanation. He also didn't have any job-related connection to the executive who called and gave him the termination notice. 
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act came online in 1967 to protect workers over 40 years of age against discrimination related to "hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment." 
But that hasn't stopped corporations from age discrimination practices, especially over the last 20 years due to global competition and investor greed. Courts have reportedly weakened the law at the pleas of corporations to the point where age discrimination is a secret but common practice. 
“Everybody knows it’s happening, but often these cases are difficult to prove [because courts have weakened the law]," says Victoria Lipnic of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 
An IBM representative said the company complies with federal laws and is "the only tech company that has not only survived but thrived for more than 100 years.” 

Read more
State Department and Coca-Cola to use blockchain in fight against forced labor
coca cola adding wi fi vending machines

Coca-Cola, Bitfury, Emercoin, and the U.S. State Department are joining forces to fight forced labor using blockchain technology.  The goal is to use blockchain's ledger tech to create a secure registry for workers that can be used to fight forced labor, child labor, and other such exploitative practices.

While best known for its use in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, there has been a push to use the blockchain's ledger technology for more humanitarian purposes, and this is the first time that the State Department has used iy in such a way.

Read more