Skip to main content

Chinese firm and former GM chief Bob Lutz circling around Fisker’s fresh corpse

Fisker Atlantic
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Former General Motors executive Bob Lutz and his upstart automotive firm VL Automotive have been snapping up remaining Fisker Karmas left and right and converting them into VL Destinos.

However, simply picking up the leftovers isn’t enough for Lutz as VL Automotive and Chinese auto parts maker Wanxiang are interested in buying the bankrupt Fisker brand, according to Reuters.

Wanxiang recently purchased also bankrupt lithium-ion battery maker A123 Systems, which has now cleverly changed its name to B456 Systems, which previously supplied batteries for the ill-fated Karma.

Before the deal can be done, however, VL and Wanxiang have to face the Department of Energy, which has a significant stake in the now defunct Fisker. The DOE had promised $529-million to Fisker but froze funds at $192-million after Fisker missed its pre-set production targets.

While there’s still much that needs to happen before the deal can be done, we’re intrigued by the possibilities.

Could a joint Wanxiang and VL Automotive investment in the Fisker brand spell the rebirth of the plug-in hybrid luxury sedan as well as the continuation of the $180,000 VL Destino? Let’s hope so.

More news is likely to follow on the fate of Fisker. So as the story unravels, we’ll be sure to keep you updated.

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Tesla’s fix for faulty Cybertruck pedal is simpler than you might think
Tesla Cybertruck

Less than five months after handing over the first Cybertrucks to customers, Tesla has had to recall the electric pickup to fix an issue with the accelerator.

In a notice issued on Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said that the recall impacts Cybertruck vehicles manufactured from November 13, 2023, to April 4, 2024. This suggests that all -- or almost all -- of the 3,878 Cybertrucks being recalled are those that have been manufactured to date.

Read more
Ford Mustang Mach-E 2024 vs. Mach-E 2023: What’s new in Ford’s electric Mustang?
Blue Ford Mustang Mach-E on a rooftop

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is easily one of the best EVs for the price, offering a solid range, sleek design, and pretty good tech on the inside. In recent years, it has gotten even cheaper -- thanks in large part to a price war between it and the Tesla Model 3. And, the company just took the wraps off of the latest and greatest version of the Mach-E, labeled as the 2024 model.

The 2024 Mustang Mach-E is notably different from the 2023 iteration in some meaningful ways. So much so that we decided to take a look at the two head-to-head -- to see if it was better to pay for the 2024 model or save some cash on any remaining 2023 stock.
Design
The Mustang Mach-E looks relatively unique -- in a good way. And thankfully, Ford has largely kept the overall design the same for the 2024 model, at least when it comes to the more consumer-focused models. The car retains the slatted taillights and crossover size. It also offers a large selection of colors, including the very blue Grabber Blue Metallic, as well as Rapid Red Metallic. It's a good selection of colors, and there should be an option for most buyers.

Read more
Tesla to begin production on new, more affordable models
Tesla Model 3

With competition increasing from Chinese and other automakers, Tesla boss Elon Musk revealed on Tuesday that his company is planning to begin production of new, more affordable models in “early 2025, if not late this year.” Notably, that's earlier than the previously stated date of late 2025, though whether Musk actually succeeds in meeting the earlier production time frame is another question entirely.

The news came as Tesla released its latest quarterly figures. Revenue for the electric vehicle maker came in at $21.3 billion, down from the $23.3 billion it reported for the same three-month period a year earlier and also down from the $25.2 billion reported in the previous quarter. Profit reached $1.1 billion, marking a 55% fall compared to the same period a year ago.

Read more