Skip to main content

Infiniti wishes its now-legendary F1 driver Sebastian Vettel weren’t so good

infiniti is unhappy with vettels f1 dominance red bull racing at 2013 abu dhabi grand prix
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“Win on Sunday, sell on Monday,” is an old car industry adage.

It may not apply anymore.

Infiniti is the title sponsor of the Infiniti Red Bull Racing Formula One team, the team of four-time F1 World Champion Sebastian Vettel.

Vettel recently clinched his fourth championship in a row with four races left in the season, a dominating performance that seems like good news for the brand with its name on his car.

That’s not the case, Andy Palmer, executive vice president of Infiniti parent Nissan, told Autocar. Palmer said Infiniti is mainly in the F1 game to build brand awareness, and that means getting people to watch the races.

“From that point of view you could say Sebastian has been too successful,” Palmer told Autocar, “Wrapping up the championship with four races to run is maybe not good news for us from that perspective.”

In other words, Vettel’s dominance has taken the sport out of F1. It’s made the racing too boring.

Even though Infiniti makes car, and F1 is a form of motorsport, Infiniti’s concerns are like those of any other sponsor. It wants as many people as possible to see its name and logo.

Historically, carmakers and race teams have been more closely connected.

Racing used to be a way for car companies to show off the performance and durability of its products. There was a time when NASCAR actually had stock cars, and that’s where the “win on Sunday, sell on Monday” mantra comes from.

F1 never featured cars that came from showrooms, but the technology and experience developed racing often trickled down to production cars. Ferrari, in particular, has aggressively leveraged F1 tech – like the hybrid system in the new LaFerrari – to make production cars better.

Sebastian Vettel driving 2014 Infiniti Q50
Image used with permission by copyright holder

However, F1 cars have gotten so advanced that there is little that can be directly applied to any road-going vehicle short of a million-dollar supercar, although F1 hopes the new hybrid drivetrains in its cars in the 2014 season will help mass-market hybrid technology in the near future.

Infiniti’s contribution to Red Bull Racing is mostly measured by dollars. The cars are developed and built by the team, and they use engines built by Renault – Nissan’s sister company – that have nothing in common with production engines.

Unlike Ferrari and other teams that are organs of car companies, Infiniti and Red Bull Racing are separate organizations. Since Infiniti is just a sponsor, cross pollination between racing and road-going car development doesn’t happen very often.

Earlier this year, Infiniti named Vettel “Director of Performance,” saying that he helped tune the 2014 Q50. It also launched a Vettel Edition FX50 crossover, and plans to slap the champ’s name on additional models.

However if no one is watching F1, no one will care that Vettel’s name is on their special-edition car; hence Infiniti’s dilemma. It may be part of the winning team, but it could still be a loser.

Frankly, we think Infiniti has a simple solution glaring it in the face: make more interesting cars. How many sales are you really missing out on if some people don’t watch the last four races of the 2013 F1 season? We wager few. Make a car people might actually want to buy, though, and you could win those race fans over handily.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla’s fix for faulty Cybertruck pedal is simpler than you might think
Tesla Cybertruck

Less than five months after handing over the first Cybertrucks to customers, Tesla has had to recall the electric pickup to fix an issue with the accelerator.

In a notice issued on Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said that the recall impacts Cybertruck vehicles manufactured from November 13, 2023, to April 4, 2024. This suggests that all -- or almost all -- of the 3,878 Cybertrucks being recalled are those that have been manufactured to date.

Read more
Ford Mustang Mach-E 2024 vs. Mach-E 2023: What’s new in Ford’s electric Mustang?
Blue Ford Mustang Mach-E on a rooftop

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is easily one of the best EVs for the price, offering a solid range, sleek design, and pretty good tech on the inside. In recent years, it has gotten even cheaper -- thanks in large part to a price war between it and the Tesla Model 3. And, the company just took the wraps off of the latest and greatest version of the Mach-E, labeled as the 2024 model.

The 2024 Mustang Mach-E is notably different from the 2023 iteration in some meaningful ways. So much so that we decided to take a look at the two head-to-head -- to see if it was better to pay for the 2024 model or save some cash on any remaining 2023 stock.
Design
The Mustang Mach-E looks relatively unique -- in a good way. And thankfully, Ford has largely kept the overall design the same for the 2024 model, at least when it comes to the more consumer-focused models. The car retains the slatted taillights and crossover size. It also offers a large selection of colors, including the very blue Grabber Blue Metallic, as well as Rapid Red Metallic. It's a good selection of colors, and there should be an option for most buyers.

Read more
Tesla to begin production on new, more affordable models
Tesla Model 3

With competition increasing from Chinese and other automakers, Tesla boss Elon Musk revealed on Tuesday that his company is planning to begin production of new, more affordable models in “early 2025, if not late this year.” Notably, that's earlier than the previously stated date of late 2025, though whether Musk actually succeeds in meeting the earlier production time frame is another question entirely.

The news came as Tesla released its latest quarterly figures. Revenue for the electric vehicle maker came in at $21.3 billion, down from the $23.3 billion it reported for the same three-month period a year earlier and also down from the $25.2 billion reported in the previous quarter. Profit reached $1.1 billion, marking a 55% fall compared to the same period a year ago.

Read more