Skip to main content

New 12-inch Retina MacBook not much more capable than last year’s model

2016 12 inch macbook speed benchmarks update 3 970x647 c copy
Image used with permission by copyright holder
With the 2016 rendition of the 12-inch MacBook having been on the market since last Tuesday, it only makes sense that benchmark results would start showing up online, either supporting or tearing down Apple’s claim of better performance.

As it turns out, the new Skylake-equipped MacBook models are faster than their 2015 counterparts. How much faster depends on your personalized configuration, but the consensus is between 5 and 18 percent.

Geekbench suggests that, with the entry-level Skylake 1.1GHz Intel Core m3 configuration, you’ll experience a CPU performance increase between 5 and 10 percent over the Broadwell MacBooks of yesteryear. That’s translated over from the Geekbench-assigned single-core score of 2,534 and the multi-core score of 5,025.

If you’re willing to spend a little more, the Skylake-wielding 1.2GHz Core m5 build achieved single and multi-core scores of 2,894 and 5,845, respectively, making it 15 to 18 percent faster than last year’s model of the same spec.

Meanwhile, a 1.3GHz Intel Core m7 model can be built to order for $1,549 or $1,749 depending on storage options. With the more powerful clock speeds attached, this model garnered 64-bit single and multi-core ratings of 3,023 and 6,430, respectively, rendering it between 9 and 17 percent faster than last year’s 1.3GHz Broadwell model.

You can get the 2016 12-inch MacBook in a variety of flavors. Color arrangements extend to Silver, Gold, Space Gray, and the newly added Rose Gold variant, while two different storage configurations also exist.

Buyers can choose between 256GB and 512GB of PCIe-based flash storage, and while they’re largely identical otherwise, the less capacious offering packs a 1.1GHz dual-core Intel Core m3 Skylake processor while the 512GB edition comes with a slightly faster 1.2GHz chip. The former costs $1,299 while the latter is $1,599.

Both the 256GB and 512GB models can be upgraded to a 1.3GHz chip of the same class for either $250 or $150, respectively.

Editors' Recommendations

Gabe Carey
Former Digital Trends Contributor
A freelancer for Digital Trends, Gabe Carey has been covering the intersection of video games and technology since he was 16…
Which color MacBook should you buy? Here’s how to pick
The MacBook Air on a table in front of a window.

Apple’s MacBook laptops come in a range of colors, and selecting which is right for you can be a tricky business. Sure, it’s perhaps not as important as deciding which chip to pick or how much memory you should buy, but it’s still a vital part of the equation. After all, you’re going to see that color every time you reach for your MacBook. You don’t want it to be something that fills you with regret.

But how should you pick a MacBook color? And what do the colors even look like in the first place? We’ve got the answers to those questions in this guide. We’d also advise you to go to an Apple Store to take a look at the MacBook colors in person, as some can be hard to appreciate just by browsing Apple’s website.

Read more
Why you should buy a MacBook Air instead of a MacBook Pro
The MacBook Air on a table in front of a window.

The MacBook Air has officially caught up. Now with the M3 on board, the MacBook Air has gained the benefits of the new chip, which was previously available just on the MacBook Pro and iMac.

Choosing between the M3 15-inch MacBook Air and the 14-inch MacBook Pro is tough, and requires an in-depth look at differences in ports, displays, speakers, and more. It's a legitimately hard decision to make.

Read more
The MacBook Air 15 vs. MacBook Pro 14: the easy way to decide
Apple's 15-inch MacBook Air placed on a desk with its lid closed.

Picking out a new MacBook isn't as easy as it used to be.

The hardest choice in the lineup might be between the 15-inch MacBook Air and the 14-inch MacBook Pro. Both are now offered with the same M3 chip, despite there being a $300 difference in the base models. But when similarly configured, there's actually only a $100 difference between these two laptops.

Read more