Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Gaming
  4. News

AMD R9 Nano wattage numbers leak ahead of August release

Add as a preferred source on Google

As much as the recent release of AMD’s Fury X high end, high bandwidth memory (HBM) sporting graphic card was a big event, the card that’s generating the most buzz at the moment is the smallest one in that same new range of GPUs – the R9 Nano. Set to make use of the same Fiji chip, but with a much smaller TDP and PCB, it has the potential to be the perfect graphics card for small system builders, so its release is an important one for AMD. The Nano has an expected release date in August, but there may already be a few units out in the wild.

Purportedly – and bear in mind, this is a rumor – those cards have now begun shipping to retailers (per Hexus), so it may not be long until we get our first look at them. We’ll have to wait until the official reviews land to give us a real take on the card, but there are some wattage efficiency numbers floating around that are said to come from embargoed AMD slides.

Recommended Videos

These numbers and the accompanying images that show the card in the flesh, tell us that it is indeed very small compared to some of the huge performance focused GPUs that we’ve become used to in recent years. It was said to be tested in a system containing an i7-5960x running at 3GHz, with 16GB of DDR4. The benchmark used was Unigine Heaven running at 3840×2180, with no AA or AF, and everything else at extreme.

The numbers given are all related to the size and power draw of the card. While the 290X in the same system was said to deliver 1.6FPS per inch, the Nano managed four FPS per inch. When it came to the TDP, the Nano delivered 0.152 FPS per watt, in comparison to 0.076FPS per watt for the 290x.

Although these numbers are not very conclusive, we should consider that the hardware is in very few hands at the moment. To give us a real verdict on whether this card is a strong performer for its size, TDP  and price point, we’ll need to wait for the full reviews, which will compare it to Nvidia hardware as well as old AMD gear.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
Apple will check your public iCloud links for harmful content, and it doesn’t rule out banning accounts
Public iCloud links now come with a content check.
iCloud Private Relay

I’ve sent more iCloud links than I can count. Still, I never once wondered who else might be looking at what sat behind them. Well, it looks like Apple has started wondering for all of us.

In a new support document, Apple confirms that iOS 27.3 will begin checking content shared through public “Anyone with the link” iCloud links for harmful material (via Apple). While the developer beta is already available, the stable build is expected in December 2026. 

Read more
Mac users will soon get the Dynamic Island experience without buying a new MacBook Pro
Your menu bar is becoming a live dashboard.
macOS 27.3 Live Activities showing music playback

A timer ticking, a song playing, a recording running: I lose track of these the second I switch windows. Well, it looks like Apple wants my Mac to keep them in view, and I’m all up for it.

Apple’s first macOS 27.3 developer beta, released this week, adds Live Activities to the menu bar of Macs without Dynamic Island. It’s hard to imagine the feature at first, since we’re used to seeing it with the Dynamic Island, but here’s how it works (and looks).

Read more
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more