Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

AT&T begins monthly data caps for broadband Internet

Add as a preferred source on Google

AT&T Logo LargeToday marks the beginning of AT&T’s limited monthly data allotments for subscribers to its DSL and U-Verse broadband Internet services. AT&T announced that it would be imposing the data caps last month and becomes the second American telecom company to do so after Comcast launched its own metering policy nearly three years ago.

Subscribers to AT&T’s DSL service will now face a 150 GB monthly limit and AT&T’s U-Verse customers will be capped at 250 GB per month.  Users of both services who exceed their monthly limits three times will be forced to begin paying $10 for every additional 50 GB.

Recommended Videos

AT&T’s reasoning behind the caps is that it reckons that the average broadband cusomter only uses about 18 GB a month. When AT&T tested data caps in parts of Texas and Nevada, it experimented with caps as low as 20 GB. AT&T decided to abandon low caps after Time Warner was lambasted for imposing similarly low limits.

AT&T has instead opted to go with higher limits that are ostensibly meant to curb so-called “data hogs” or customers  who consume a “disproportionate amount of bandwidth.” AT&T says it will alert users as they reach 65, 90 and 100 percent of their monthly allotments. Customers can also check their monthly usage online.

Critics of high-speed Internet caps say that they’re an example of telecom companies trying pad profits by charging more for a service that costs little to provide in an unlimited format (text messaging plans are another often cited example). Some users fear that over time AT&T will impose lower and lower limits while charging more and more for usage. AT&T hasn’t indicated its commitment to its current cap structure. Critics also say that there’s little incentive for AT&T to ensure that its metering tools work effectively and that customers could wind up being charged for data that they didn’t use.

Like it or not, if you’re an AT&T broadband customer who tirelessly streams movies or gorges on torrents files, better keep an eye on your data gauge starting today.

Aemon Malone
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Apple will check your public iCloud links for harmful content, and it doesn’t rule out banning accounts
Public iCloud links now come with a content check.
iCloud Private Relay

I’ve sent more iCloud links than I can count. Still, I never once wondered who else might be looking at what sat behind them. Well, it looks like Apple has started wondering for all of us.

In a new support document, Apple confirms that iOS 27.3 will begin checking content shared through public “Anyone with the link” iCloud links for harmful material (via Apple). While the developer beta is already available, the stable build is expected in December 2026. 

Read more
Mac users will soon get the Dynamic Island experience without buying a new MacBook Pro
Your menu bar is becoming a live dashboard.
macOS 27.3 Live Activities showing music playback

A timer ticking, a song playing, a recording running: I lose track of these the second I switch windows. Well, it looks like Apple wants my Mac to keep them in view, and I’m all up for it.

Apple’s first macOS 27.3 developer beta, released this week, adds Live Activities to the menu bar of Macs without Dynamic Island. It’s hard to imagine the feature at first, since we’re used to seeing it with the Dynamic Island, but here’s how it works (and looks).

Read more
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more