Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Mobile
  4. News

Amazon is seeking FCC permission to carry out wireless technology tests

Add as a preferred source on Google

Amazon has filed for permission to run tests on experimental wireless communications technology, which could be related to an expansion of the company’s drone-based delivery service Prime Air. The project has been unveiled due to documentation that was made public last week.

Tests will take place at Amazon’s headquarters in Seattle, before moving on to its customer service facility in Kennewick, Washington, according to a report from Business Insider. Each location will be temporarily fitted with three low-band, fixed-base transmitters that can communicate with a fleet of mobile units.

Recommended Videos

Amazon told the Federal Communications Commission that its base stations will only transmit for an average of five minutes per hour, per day, per week on any particular channel or band. Furthermore, any of the mobile units that don’t conform to FCC regulations will be recovered and retrieved by the company once testing is complete.

There is speculation this project is related to Prime Air, largely because Neil Woodward is listed as the primary contact on documents submitted to the FCC. Woodward is a retired astronaut who has been with Amazon since 2008 and currently acts as the senior manager for its drone delivery services.

If the tests are related to Prime Air, they will demonstrate how serious Amazon is about implementing drone delivery on a large scale. This kind of technology could revolutionize the way the company handles deliveries — but the retailer won’t gain permission to roll out its own fleet of drones without demonstrating exactly how they will operate beforehand.

Whatever its focus, this project certainly seems to be a long-term concern. Amazon states in the documents filed last week that it expects to spend five months carrying out the research and tests aren’t scheduled to get underway until early 2018 — assuming that the company is given permission.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more