Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Fighting fire with bass? Sounds crazy, but these college students are making it happen

Add as a preferred source on Google

You’ve probably heard of fighting fire with water, and even fighting fire with fire — but what about fighting fire with sound? It might seem like the stuff of science fiction, but a pair of enterprising students from George Mason University have built a machine that does just that.

Believe it or not, scientists have been tinkering with sonic fire extinguishing for years now. It’s already been proven effective in controlled situations — but it took engineering students Viet Tran and Seth Robertson to shrink it down and make the technology portable.

Recommended Videos

Screen Shot 2015-03-27 at 3.38.23 PMUsing $600 of their own money, Tran and Robertson have produced a functioning prototype that, when directed at a small fire, will extinguish the blaze with nothing more than sound. Basically, by directing a stream of low-frequency sounds at the flames, the device is able to create pressure waves in the air and rob the fire of oxygen — effectively choking it out.

“It’s low-frequency sounds—like the thump-thump bass in hip-hop that works,” Tran told George Mason’s internal news organization, joking that rappers like 50 Cent could probably douse a fire, and that hip-hop celebrity endorsements might be just the ticket to hawk their fire extinguisher.

While it’s still just a prototype at this point, Tran and Robertson have filed a provisional patent for the contraption, and plan to spend the next year refining it and considering how to bring it to market

As it’s still in the early stages of development, the two still aren’t sure exactly how their invention will be used. Tran speculates that it might end up being used as a kitchen device, used to put out small stovetop fires and the like, but the duo also imagine a few more futuristic applications for the sonic extinguisher

“Eventually I’d like to see this applied to, maybe, swarm robotics,” Tran added “where they would be attached to a drone and that would be applied to forest fires or even building fires where you wouldn’t want to sacrifice human life.”

Drew Prindle
Former Senior Editor, Features
Drew Prindle is an award-winning writer, editor, and storyteller who currently serves as Senior Features Editor for Digital…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more