Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Web
  4. News

Can Swarm Intelligence predict the Olympic winners?

Add as a preferred source on Google

It may be dangerous in other contexts, but group-think in the context of Swarm Intelligence tends to be pretty accurate. Following Unanimous AI’s previous success with making predictions around events like the Oscars and the Super Bowl, the company is back at it, this time with the Olympics. Using UNU, the artificial intelligence-based platform that allows groups to put their heads together to come up with predictions (also known as swarm intelligence), a group of eight elite swimmers has created what Unanimous calls a “super swarm” to make predictions about this year’s results in the pool. 

While the swarm is smaller than many of those normally used by Unanimous to make their predictions, the qualifications of these eight elite swimmers lends additional credence to their hunches. With a number of national team members and Olympic Trial competitors, Unanimous claims that this latest swarm is “basically a ‘super-expert’ that taps the collective intelligence of genuine experts.”  

So what do they think?

Recommended Videos

When asked how many gold medals Michael Phelps would win this go-around, the swarm thinks the magic number is 3. As far as the total number of gold medals Team USA will win in the pool, the experts predict somewhere between 15 and 19.

The swarm seems pretty confident in a few Australian swimmers, predicting that someone from down under will win the 100M and 200M backstroke (Mitchell Larkin) and the 100M freestyle (Cameron McEvoy). Australia’s team is also favored to win the 4x100M Free Relay, with the USA slated to come in second, and France to come in third.

Nathan Adrian looks like a strong contender in the freestyle races, according to UNU, while Ryan Murphy seems to be holding down the fort with his backstroke.

So how accurate are these super swarm predictions? Guess we’ll just have to wait and see over the next couple weeks.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more