Skip to main content

Maker of iPhone breathalyzer issues full refunds to customers over false claims

iphone breathalyzer ftc breathometer png
Image used with permission by copyright holder
If you were one of the thousands of people who bought Breathometer’s breathalyzer accessory for the iPhone, you can now request a full refund for your purchase, following a finding that the company was guilty of false advertising.

Breathometer might have been founded in 2012, but its story truly began in 2013 when the company launched its Indiegogo campaign for its self-titled breathalyzer accessory. Advertised as the world’s first smartphone breathalyzer, the Breathometer, in concert with its companion app, promised to provide an accurate blood alcohol concentration (BAC) measurement and track your past results for you to better judge how much time needs to pass before you can drive.

Enough people believed in the idea that, by the time the Breathometer’s crowdfunding efforts ran out of time, the device had garnered $138,437 from 3,816 backers. Breathometer even released the Breeze, a $100 second-generation device that connected to your iPhone over Bluetooth. By comparison, the $50 first-generation device connected to your iPhone through its headphone jack.

As with most accessories that track some sort of metric, making sure the Breathometer was accurate was essential to its functionality, particularly since people might depend on it to see whether or not they should get behind the wheel after a few drinks. Breathometer addressed this in the campaign’s page, where it stated that whatever arrives at backers’ doorsteps met the company’s “high expectations of what consumers want and need.”

According to the Federal Trade Commission, however, Breathometer overinflated its accuracy claims that both its breathalyzer accessories passed “government-lab grade testing” and that the Breeze was a “law enforcement-grade product.” Even worse, the FTC alleged that Breathometer knew that the Breeze reported lower BAC levels than they might actually be and did not say anything to customers.

“People relied on the defendant’s products to decide whether it was safe to get behind the wheel,” said FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection director Jessica Rich. “Overstating the accuracy of the devices was deceptive — and dangerous.”

As a result, Breathometer agreed to issue full refunds for its first- and second-generation breathalyzers to those who make such a request. Sales of both accessories reportedly totaled $5.1 million, so that is quite a chunk of change to return — assuming consumers ask for it.

Breathometer is also disallowed from making similar accuracy claims with future breathalyzers, unless they undergo rigorous testing. This one should be easy enough, since the company no longer sells or manufactures breathalyzers.

If you picked up either the first-generation or Breeze breathalyzer, a request form will be available through Breathometer’s website to claim your refund.

Editors' Recommendations

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
Here’s how Apple could change your iPhone forever
An iPhone 15 Pro Max laying on its back, showing its home screen.

Over the past few months, Apple has released a steady stream of research papers detailing its work with generative AI. So far, Apple has been tight-lipped about what exactly is cooking in its research labs, while rumors circulate that Apple is in talks with Google to license its Gemini AI for iPhones.

But there have been a couple of teasers of what we can expect. In February, an Apple research paper detailed an open-source model called MLLM-Guided Image Editing (MGIE) that is capable of media editing using natural language instructions from users. Now, another research paper on Ferret UI has sent the AI community into a frenzy.

Read more
There’s a big problem with the iPhone’s Photos app
The Apple iPhone 15 Plus's gallery app.

While my primary device these days continues to be my iPhone 15 Pro, I’ve dabbled with plenty of Android phones since I’ve been here at Digital Trends. One of my favorite brands of phone has been the Google Pixel because of its strong suite of photo-editing tools and good camera hardware.

Google first added the Magic Eraser capability with the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, which is a tool I love using. Then, with the Pixel 8 series, Google added the Magic Editor, which uses generative AI to make edits that wouldn’t be possible otherwise. There are also tools like Photo Unblur, which is great for old photographs and enhancing images that were captured with low-quality sensors.

Read more
Why you should buy the iPhone 15 Pro Max instead of the iPhone 15 Pro
Someone holding an iPhone 15 Pro Max outside on a patio, showing the back of the Natural Titanium color.

If you want the best iPhone money can buy in 2024, you have two options: the iPhone 15 Pro and the iPhone 15 Pro Max. They have the same chipset, similar display technology, nearly identical cameras, etc. It's a really close battle, save for the fact that the iPhone 15 Pro is $200 cheaper.

It might be tempting to save some cash and choose the iPhone 15 Pro, but I recommend you splurge for the larger (and more expensive) iPhone 15 Pro Max. Why? Let me explain.
It's a big iPhone you won't hate using

Read more