Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

ASRock leaks AMD RX 5600 XT specs, outing probable GTX 1660 Ti-like performance

Add as a preferred source on Google

ASRock has prematurely released the full specifications of AMD’s as-yet-unannounced midrange new-generation graphics card, the RX 5600 XT. It will have the same number of stream processors as the RX 5700, but with lower clock speeds and less memory. This all but confirms it will compete with the likes of Nvidia’s GTX 1660 Super and Ti, replacing the aged and increasingly-hard-to-find Vega 56.

AMD has needed to flesh out its RX 5000-series ever since its debut with just two cards in July 2019. As capable and as competitive with Nvidia’s midrange RTX GPUs as they are, RX 5700 and 5700 XT didn’t go far in updating AMD’s graphics card lineup. The RX 5500 XT debuted on December 12, and now it looks like the 5600 XT will follow shortly after, further expanding the range and offering greater competition for Nvidia’s 16-series GPUs.

Recommended Videos

The original information leak appeared on Reddit, but has since been deleted. VideoCardz managed to grab all of the important details, however, so we know that ASRock’s 5600 XT Challenger OC will have 2,304 stream processors (the same number as the RX 5700), but with lower clock speeds.

RX 5700 XT RX 5700 RX 5600 XT RX 5500 XT
Stream processors 2560 2,304 2,304 1,408
Base clock 1,605MHz 1,465MHz 1,235MHz 1,607Mhz
Game clock 1,755MHz 1,625MHz 1,460MHz 1,717MHz
Boost clock 1,905MHz 1,725MHz 1,620MHz 1,845MHz
Memory 8GB GDDR6 @ 14 Gbps 8GB GDDR6 @ 14 Gbps 6GB GDDR6 @ 12 Gbps 4GB/8GB GDDR6 @ 14 Gbps
Memory bus 256-bit 256-bit 192-bit 128-bit
Memory bandwidth 448GBps 448GBps 288GBps 224GBps

The 5600 XT is an intriguing GPU. With only clock speed really differentiating the cores, it’s possible that overclocking on a card with good cooling could significantly narrow the performance gap between it and the 5700. That said, memory bandwidth could be a problem with the 5600 XT. With just 6GB of GDDR6 at 12 Gbps, it actually has less, and slower memory than the 5500 XT. Its greater memory bus helps its bandwidth, but with 35% less than the 5700, that’s where the performance gap will be felt the most. Memory overclocking could be a major focus for those looking to get the most from their 5600 XT.

These specifications can be generally trusted as an accurate interpretation of the reference 5600 XT, but since this card is ASRock’s own factory overclocked and tweaked model (the Challenger OC) it is likely that there will be some alterations in clock speeds, involving the game clock in particular. It’s quite likely that higher clocked versions will be available from other manufacturers, or even with alternate versions of ASRock’s own designs.

In any case, the performance of the 5600 XT should put it right in the middle of the pack. Some allegedly leaked 3DMark test results from earlier in December suggest it will be slightly faster than an AMD Vega 56, which would put the 5600 XT a little ahead of Nvidia’s GTX 1660 Ti, and a little behind the RTX 2060.

That’s still speculative as there are still no verified third-party (or even first-party) benchmarks of this card, especially when paired with modern hardware, but it seems likely considering where AMD has positioned its existing lineup in the market. Pricing will be the key with the 5600 XT. Where the 5500 XT managed to slightly outperform its competition (GTX 1650 Super) at a slightly inflated price, we wouldn’t be surprised to see the 5600 XT do much the same. With the 5700 sitting just north of $350 and the 5500 XT just north of $200, a $280-$300 price tag for the 5600 XT seems reasonable to expect.

With CES 2020 just weeks away, it’s possible that we’ll see the 5600 XT debut there, with an early 2020 release, ahead of a possible “big-Navi” unveiling later in the year. That leaves plenty of room for Nvidia to reposition itself ahead of its next-generation Ampere graphics line later in 2020, but with rumors of its delay, it may be some time still before we see any new, high-end graphics cards from either the red or green team.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
Reddit will force everyone to log in, and there’s no escape if you want to post or just lurk
The login-only experience will go into the testing phase in the coming months, starting with a few overseas markets.
reddit

Reddit is making login mandatory for all users of the platform. In a lengthy post, the Reddit chief explained that the company is moving to a permanently logged-in experience because it wants to offer users more personalization, helping them find content that’s more relevant to their interests and tastes.

The core idea, according to the company, is to nudge users into joining more communities and engaging with content through comments, votes, and more. The company, however, assures that the change won’t affect anonymity, which has long been one of the platform’s core appeals. The sign-up flow isn’t changing either. You won’t be required to submit any information beyond what’s already needed to create a Reddit account.

Read more
Your search engine could be hijacked by a Chrome extension that barely does anything
Your next search might take a detour you never approved.
Google Chrome

A browser extension that does nothing except change your search engine sounds harmless, almost boring, right? After reading this research, I’m convinced you shouldn't ignore it.

Security firm Socket says it found over 300 Chrome extensions that quietly swap a user’s default search engine and route every search through servers controlled by the people behind them before it reaches Bing or Yahoo. Even more alarming, these extensions have reportedly racked up roughly 13.4 million installs over the past decade.

Read more
Intel’s 6W Moon Lake chips could make budget laptops cooler, quieter, and more efficient at a cost
A tiny chip with big battery life ambitions.
Intel Core

Cheap laptops, the ones with a wheezy fan and a battery that taps out by lunch, have burned me before, which is why I usually stay away from them and advise my friends to do the same.

So, when a leak claims Intel is building a chip just for them, with a power rating of only 6W (compared to 15 to 20W for regular chips), I’m a bit excited, but perhaps even more cautious.

Read more