Skip to main content

Nvidia GTX 1660 Super vs. GTX 1660 Ti vs. GTX 1660

Although something like Nvidia’s RTX 3080 is seriously impressive, it’s not the right graphics card for every gamer. The GTX 16-series cards offer solid performance at a much lower price, which is great for gamers playing at 1080p or those interested in esports titles — especially now that they enjoy FSR support, too. The GTX 1660 is the best of the range, but there are multiple variants available. Between the GTX 1660 Super, GTX 1660 Ti, and GTX 1660, which should you choose?

We threw all three cards into the ring to see how they hold up. There are a lot of differences between these cards, some major and others minor. Regardless, one thing is clear: They’re not all equal.

If you want to consider other GPUs, check out our guide to the best graphics cards, whatever your budget. That might be a good idea if you’re in the market to build a computer now, too, as stock shortages have pushed many of Nvidia’s 16-series cards off the shelves.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Pricing and availability

The Gigabyte Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti graphics card.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti was the first of Nvidia’s GTX 16-series — an entry-level alternative to its RTX graphics range and a replacement for its more modest GTX 10-series cards. It lacked the higher CUDA core counts, RT and Tensor cores, and expansive feature sets of the RTX cards but was based on the same Turing 12nm architecture. It debuted on February 22, 2019, and was followed shortly after on March 14 by the GTX 1660, a card with fewer CUDA cores and slower memory.

The Nvidia GTX 1660 Super launched on October 29, 2019, and was designed to sit in between the two existing 1660 cards in both price and performance.

All three cards are out of stock across retailers thanks to the ongoing GPU shortage. There are a few ways to get a card around MSRP, including EVGA’s queue system and Newegg Shuffle. Neither of these programs have options for any 1660 model, however. If you’re set on any 1660 variant, your best options are to call local retailers like Micro Center and Best Buy or pay up on the secondhand market.

EVGA’s queue system and Newegg Shuffle may not feature 1660 models, but they do feature the much more powerful RTX 30-series graphics cards. If you’re lucky, you can score an RTX 3060 through one of these programs for less than the secondhand price of a 1660, and the 3060 will perform much better.


A Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti graphics card.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The GTX 1660 cards aren’t hugely distinct in terms of performance, but some offer greater bang for buck than others.

GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Ti
GPU TU116-300 TU116-300 TU116-400
CUDA Cores 1,408 1,408 1,536
Base Clock 1,530MHz 1,530MHz 1,500MHz
Boost Clock 1,785MHz 1,785MHz 1,770MHz
Memory Speed 8Gbps 14Gbps 12Gbps
TDP 120w 125w 120w

When the GTX 1660 and 1660 Ti debuted in early 2019, the obvious differences between them were the 9% disparity in CUDA cores and the considerably faster memory on the Ti. The GTX 1660 Super, on the other hand, is less of a gap-bridging GPU and more of an alternative to the 1660 Ti. It has a slightly higher TDP, a slightly higher clock speed, and faster memory. It has the same GPU and CUDA core count as the standard 1660, posting it ever-so-slightly below the 1660 Ti in terms of its raw performance, but it’s a close-run race.

In practice, this results in a graphics card lineup that is oddly stacked. The GTX 1660 and 1660 Ti are clearly defined as top and bottom of this trio of cards, but the GTX 1660 Super is barely weaker than the 1660 Ti. In some testing, we’ve seen it perform as little as 2% worse. That’s a near-insignificant difference and certainly problematic for the Ti, because there’s a near $50 difference between them, which at this price level is dramatic.

It depends on the game, though. At 1080p, especially, the 1660 Super soars ahead on its Ti and normal variants in Resident Evil 2. However, the Ti version trades places with the Super in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and the two are nearly identical in Battlefield V. The only constant between games is the normal GTX 1660. It consistently performs lower than the Super and Ti variants, even if it’s only by a small margin.

The various factory overclocked and cooled versions of each card may even things out on a pricing scale, but the GTX 1660 Super eats into the 1660 Ti’s market considerably, giving it little room to breathe.

Ray tracing, Reshade, NULL

Battlefield V ray traced eye reflection.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

One of the greatest differences between Nvidia’s GTX and its RTX graphics cards is that the latter features RT cores and Tensor cores for ray tracing and deep learning super sampling acceleration. The GTX graphics cards, including the 16-series, can perform ray-tracing calculations, but without high levels of general compute performance (like a 3080 Ti has, for example), it’s largely unplayable. The GTX 1660 Super isn’t any better than GTX 1070 is, which is rather poor.

DLSS (deep learning super sampling) is also off the table with these cards, as they lack the Tensor cores to support it. What they can do, though, is take advantage of other Nvidia driver-level features. All three of the GTX 1660s support Nvidia’s ultra-low-latency (NULL) technology, for faster in-game response during competitive play. They can also enjoy all the post-processing effects introduced with Nvidia’s Reshade support.

New GeForce Gaming Features: ReShade, Low Latency, and Image Sharpening

Reshade isn’t new — gamers have been enjoying its effects on AMD and Nvidia GPUs for years already, but now it’s officially supported and integrated through Nvidia’s control panel. All three of the 1660s fully support this. But due to the slight performance hit that some processing effects and filters take, the 1660 Ti should be the best equipped to handle it. We doubt the Super will be too far behind, though.

The 1660 and 1660 Ti feel super redundant

MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti ARMOR 11G graphics card.
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

Nvidia made an intriguing move with the introduction of the GTX 1660 Super. It’s an excellent card that offers noticeably improved performance over the GTX 1660 at around the same price. That means we’re almost always going to recommend the Super over the standard 1660. But what about the Ti?

If you were to line the three 1660s up side by side, the 1660 Ti would prove to be the most capable option available, but only slightly so. If you know the ins and outs of game and computer production, you can close that slight gap pretty quickly by just running your CPU at a higher clock rate.

Ultimately, we recommend the Super to gamers, even though the Ti has a slightly higher performance output for some titles. That said, it’s tough for us to recommend any card at the moment because no retailer has any of these three cards in stock right now. It may be better to try and track down a 3060 Ti or wait for the launch of the newer 3060. (Although, we always recommend waiting for third-party benchmarks.)

At the moment, the current card series is all AMD can offer because no other card matches the price point and quality of these products. The RX 6800 and 6800 XT are impressive cards, though, so we imagine AMD will release cheaper cards based on the same architecture sometime in 2021.


Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
Nvidia RTX 50-series graphics cards: news, release date, price, and more
RTX 4070 seen from the side.

Nvidia already makes some of the best graphics cards, but it's also not resting on its laurels. Although the RTX 40-series, which has been bolstered by a refresh, is still very recent, Nvidia is also working on its next-gen GPUs from the RTX 50-series.

The release date of RTX 50-series GPUs is still at least a few months away, but various rumors and leaks give us a better idea of what to expect. Here's everything we know about Nvidia's upcoming generation of graphics cards.
RTX 50-series: pricing and release date

Read more
GPU prices are back on the rise again
RTX 4060 Ti sitting next to the RTX 4070.

We haven't had to worry about the prices of some of the best graphics cards for quite some time. With most GPUs sold around their recommended retail price, there are plenty of options for PC builders in need of a new graphics card. However, a new report indicates that we might see an increase in GPU prices, especially on the cards made by Nvidia's add-in board partners (AIBs). Is it time to start worrying about another GPU shortage? Not quite, but it might be better to shop now before it gets worse.

The grim news comes from IT Home, a Chinese tech publication that cites anonymous "industry sources" as it predicts that Nvidia's AIBs are about to raise their prices by up to 10% on average -- and this won't be limited to high-end GPUs along the lines of the RTX 4090. In fact, IT Home reports that the RTX 4070 Super has already received a price increase of about 100 yuan, which equals roughly $14 at the time of this writing. This is a subtle price increase given that the GPU costs $550 to $600, but according to the report, it might just be the beginning.

Read more
The sad reality of AMD’s next-gen GPUs comes into view
The AMD RX 7900 graphics card on a pink background.

For months now, various leakers agreed on one thing -- AMD is tapping out of the high-end GPU race in this generation, leaving Nvidia to focus on making the best graphics cards with no competitor. Today's new finding may confirm that theory, as the first RDNA 4 GPU to make an official appearance is one that has been speculated about for months: Navi48.

Following the typical naming convention for AMD, the flagship in the RDNA 4 generation should have been called Navi41 -- and it very well might have been, but according to various sources, that GPU will not be making an appearance in this generation. Hence, the flagship is now said to be the Navi48, and the latest finding shared by Kepler_L2 on X tells us that might indeed be the case.

Read more