Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Microsoft paying out $250k for info on Rustock botnet operators

Add as a preferred source on Google

botnetThough the infamous Rustock botnet has been silent for quite some time now, Microsoft is going for the botnet’s throat and hoping that you can help out. The company is offering a monetary award for any information that leads to the identification, arrest and criminal conviction of those responsible for controlling this botnet. The maximum reward amount: $250,000 USD.

At the height of its power the monstrous Rustock botnet had enslaved a sizable number of computers around the world as part of its spam force and had the capacity to send out 30 billion spam emails daily. Microsoft also points out that the botnet was involved in other crimes including counterfeit versions of pharmaceuticals and violating trademarks.

Recommended Videos

Rustock has stayed inactive since March 16 when Microsoft rallied its industry partners and law enforcement in a strike against the the botnet called “operation b107”. The company and partners filed suit against the botnet’s operators which allowed U.S. law enforcement to seize command-and-control centers within the country. MS says that the Rustock infection base has been halved in the four months since the takedown, but there are still many thousands of infected computers that need to be scrubbed of the malware.

After the March attack, the tech corporation started in after the operators by taking out quarter-page 30-day ads in newspapers from Moscow and St. Petersburg in order to notify the Rustock operators of the civil lawsuit. The IP addresses of the operators supposedly came out of Russia.

According to Richard Boscovich, a Senior Attorney in Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit, Microsoft is now resorting to this $250,000 reward because they want to augment their civil discovery efforts. The attorney says “Microsoft has already been gathering strong evidence in our ongoing investigation and this reward aims to take that effort a step further.”

Anyone that has information and wants to make a little side cash should email the tech giant directly at avreward@microsoft.com.

Jeff Hughes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a SF Bay Area-based writer/ninja that loves anything geek, tech, comic, social media or gaming-related.
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more