Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Here’s why Apple’s VR headset may become an ‘expensive flop’

Add as a preferred source on Google

Apple’s upcoming mixed-reality headset risks becoming a “high-profile flop” due to its high price and the wariness of potential customers. That’s according to a new report from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, who lays out numerous hurdles the headset has to clear if it isn’t to end up an embarrassment for Apple.

So far, most leaks and rumors surrounding the headset have been more or less positive, touting the highly advanced technology the product is said to contain. The price, however, has been a point of contention, and it is that point that could drag down Apple’s efforts, the report claims.

A model poses with a Meta Quest Pro over a colorful background.
Meta

Apple’s headset, potentially dubbed Reality Pro, is expected to launch at a special spring event and cost around $3,000. That will make it a very expensive proposition — double the price of the Meta Quest Pro — which could limit its appeal to consumers.

Recommended Videos

That on its own might not condemn the Reality Pro if Apple is able to offer a compelling reason to buy the device or lower the price before too long. But there’s another issue that could prove a major sticking point: the lack of appetite for mixed-reality devices from the general public.

Unlike the iPhone, Apple’s headset is not entering a mature market with a far superior product compared to rivals. While Gurman believes the device will be “a marvel and far more advanced than anything else on the market,” mixed-reality headsets are still a very niche, almost embryonic product category. There is not an overwhelming demand from the public for more devices, and those headsets that have launched have struggled for mass-market adoption.

A potential ‘bomb’

A render of Apple's VR headset.
Apple AR/VR headset render Ian Zelbo

Gurman doesn’t think Apple’s headset yet has a “killer app” that will attract customers. For one thing, it “probably won’t be better than the iPhone or iPad at anything other than video watching and FaceTime, and I don’t think there are many consumers willing to pay $3,000 for that,” Gurman states.

As well as that, the headset is only expected to last around two hours per charge, will not work well outdoors, and could have a limited selection of apps and games on launch. Those drawbacks will all make it harder for Apple to convince potential customers to part with their cash.

Power On: Apple’s upcoming mixed-reality headset will be nothing like the original iPod, iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch and put the company’s reputation as a guaranteed hit maker on the line. Here’s why — https://t.co/Ah4HnctHeh

— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) January 29, 2023

In order to avoid its headset becoming a “bomb,” Gurman outlines three things Apple will need to do: lower the price, enlist developers to build compelling apps for the platform, and position the headset as a “developer prototype” that exists to prepare people for the future.

While rumors suggest Apple is working on a cheaper headset, the Reality Pro’s product positioning could be a problem. Apple’s marketing team “isn’t accustomed to downplaying the launch of a new product,” but aiming the headset squarely at consumers instead of developers could mean it misses the mark.

The report still had some positive words for Apple’s efforts. The headset, Gurman said, will contain “an immense amount of new technology” that will place it far beyond what rivals can offer, making it one of the best virtual reality headsets on the market. But the road ahead is clearly still littered with obstacles. With just a few months until the headset’s predicted launch, we’ll have to see if Apple can pull the rabbit out of the hat — or be left with an expensive flop.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
How to set up selfie video sign-in for your Google account
Your face can now serve as a way to get back into your Google account. Here's how to set it up.
Google account selfie sign in tutorial featured

Losing access to a Google account is rarely a quick fix, but Google has been actively working to make things easier. Last year, the company introduced a feature called Recovery Contacts that lets you designate a trusted friend or family member to verify your identity if you ever get locked out. Now, Google has introduced a new option, one that uses your face to get you back in instead of a phone call to a friend.

Like Recovery Contacts, the new selfie video authentication feature requires some setup before you can use your face to sign into your Google account. This involves recording the reference video that Google will use to verify your identity whenever you attempt to log in this way. Here's how to set up selfie video sign-in for your Google account.

Read more
Framework Desktop packs Ryzen AI Max, up to 192GB of RAM, and local AI into a mini PC
192GB of RAM in a desktop this small? Framework says yes.
Framework Desktop feature

Framework has built a reputation for shipping things other PC makers won't even attempt, and its latest teaser keeps that streak alive. At AMD's Advancing AI event, the company previewed a new version of its Framework Desktop, and this one is clearly built with one goal in mind: running large AI models locally on your computer. If you have been eyeing a way to run local AI, this could be the machine to watch.

So what's actually new here?

Read more
AI is becoming the shoulder we cry on, and that worries me
Chatbots are learning to generate comfort now
Siri AI voice change

I expected artificial intelligence to be faster in performing calculations or data analysis than humans. But emotional support is one of the last things I could imagine it being better at. New research led by the University of Manchester, alongside Durham University, found that leading AI chatbots could match or sometimes outperform humans when responding to everyday emotional problems. The researchers conducted five studies involving 1,233 participants and tested responses from ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro.

The researchers conducted five studies involving 1,233 participants and tested responses from ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro. Participants evaluated messages responding to situations such as being passed over for a promotion or returning to an untidy shared home. They were initially kept unaware of whether each response came from a person or an AI system.

Read more