Skip to main content

NHTSA misses rearview camera legislation deadline

2013 Honda Civic Si rearview camera imageWhile all eyes were on the “fiscal cliff” negotiations, another organ of the federal government was doing a little procrastination of its own. Just a couple of weeks ago, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said we wanted a bill mandating rearview cameras in all new cars ready to go by December 31. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the White House missed the deadline.

The bill was supposed to finalize rules for the implementation of a rearview camera mandate. This is the fourth time the NHTSA has failed to meet one of its own deadlines on this matter since Congress approved the rearview camera proposal in 2007.

“The department remains committed to improving rearview visibility for the nation’s fleet and will issue a final rule upon completion of the regulatory review process,” an NHTSA statement reported by the Detroit News said.

The bill is currently in limbo; it is under review by the White House Office of Management and Budget, but no new deadline has been set.

Despite the delays, the NHTSA believes rearview cameras are the best way to prevent drivers from hitting pedestrians and obstacles while backing up.

The NHTSA said that about 100 children age five or younger die in “backover” accidents annually. A previous report stated that 300 total fatalities occurred annually, along with 16,000 injuries.

The agency said rearview cameras could prevent between 95 and 112 fatalities per year, and between 7,072 and 8,374 injuries.

Cameras would also increase a new car’s MSRP. According to the NHTSA, they would add between $58 and $88 to the cost of a new car with a car with a display screen, and between $159 and $203 to a car without a display screen.

The NHTSA calculates that the rearview camera proposal would cost between $11.8 million and $19.7 million per life saved.

A previous study by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers put the cost of implementing rearview camera legislation at $11 million, compared to $9.8 million for roof strength regulations and less than $4 million for side impact regulations.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more
Cybertruck production reportedly halted over pedal issue
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

Tesla’s Cybertruck has been hit by a production delay caused by an issue with a part of the vehicle, a number of media reports have claimed.

Read more
Don’t let the gimmicks fool you. The Ioniq 5 N is a serious track car
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N drifting.

We’re finally getting to the fun part of automakers’ methodical quest to replicate their lineups with electric cars.

Performance versions of ordinary cars have been a staple of the auto industry for decades. But while we’ve already seen some variants of EVs boasting more power and more impressive stats — think Tesla Model S Plaid or Lucid Air Sapphire — the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the first to truly apply that format to an EV.

Read more