Skip to main content

Connected car-exclusive Wi-Fi band may be opened up for other uses

NHTSA DOT UMTRI V2V test in Ann Arbor, MichiganBecause the airwaves are getting crowded, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will reconsider a 1999 decision that set aside a slice of bandwidth for connected car technologies, Automotive News (sub. required) reports. The car-exclusive band could potentially be opened up to use by other devices.

The 5.9-GHz band was originally set aside for tech that would allow cars to communicate with one another as a way of preventing crashes. Such a system, called vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) is currently being tested in Michigan.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) says this tech could eliminate 80 percent of crashes where the driver is not impaired. While the tech has been slow to develop, automakers were counting on having their own Wi-Fi band to implement it.

Yesterday, the FCC voted unanimously to “advance a proposal that would open up that same band to devices such as computers and cell phones,” Automotive News reports. However, a final ruling may not come until next year.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said increasing congestion in commercial areas like airports and convention centers justifies opening the 5.9-GHz band to other devices. He also believes connected car technologies can coexist with other Wi-Fi devices.

Carmakers aren’t so sure. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group made up of most of the major carmakers, is urging the FCC not to allow non-automotive uses of the 5.9-GHz band.

The group believes other Wi-Fi signals could create interference, and that connected car technology is close enough to market that carmakers will need the band soon.

“It is imperative that, as we move forward, we do adequate research and testing on potential interference issues that could arise from opening up this band to unlicensed users and that the commission not rush to judgment,” the Alliance said in a statement.

Carmakers want the FCC to wait for a report by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which isn’t due out until 2014.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more
Cybertruck production reportedly halted over pedal issue
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

Tesla’s Cybertruck has been hit by a production delay caused by an issue with a part of the vehicle, a number of media reports have claimed.

Read more
Don’t let the gimmicks fool you. The Ioniq 5 N is a serious track car
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N drifting.

We’re finally getting to the fun part of automakers’ methodical quest to replicate their lineups with electric cars.

Performance versions of ordinary cars have been a staple of the auto industry for decades. But while we’ve already seen some variants of EVs boasting more power and more impressive stats — think Tesla Model S Plaid or Lucid Air Sapphire — the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the first to truly apply that format to an EV.

Read more