Intel Launches Three Quad-Core CPUs

By Geoff Duncan Published January 9, 2007

Intel Corporation has decided to use this year’s CES as a way to put pressure on rival chipmaker AMD by introducing three new quad-core processors, the Core 2 Quad and two entries in the Xeon 3200 series. Although quad-core offerings from Intel aren’t new, the company is now taking the technology out of servers, research labs, and high-end computing tasks and towards the general consumer market—and Intel has sworn up and down it’s working hard with software vendors to create the types of multi-threaded applications which can take full advantage of the multiple processor cores.

The new Core 2 Quad is aimed to bring oomph to Viiv-enabled home PCs, and Intel is playing up the chip’s added performance as a way to enhance media management, home entertainment, and digital home functions. Intel plans to introduce the 2.4 GHz Q6600 Core 2 Quad for $851, in lots of 1,000: expect to see them turning up in high-end PCs aimed at digital media professionals and gamers before working their way down to mainstream PCs.

Recommended Videos

Meanwhile, Intel is pricing Xeon 3200s at $690 and $851 for 2.13 GHz X3210 and 2.4 GHz X3220, respectively: the new Xeons are intended for single-socket servers designed to handle everyday Web, email, and file sharing tasks. The new processors sport a 1066 MHz front-side bus and 8 MB of L2 cache—and, unlike consumer applications, multithreaded server software is already widely available to tap into the 3200’s four cores. The Xeons are available today; expect Core 2 Quad to find their way into systems in early 2007.

Former Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

Apple will finally stop making iPhone-to-Windows copy-paste such a chore

Your iPhone may finally copy and paste with a Windows PC like it should

Apple Universal Clipboard feature

Copying something on an iPhone and pasting it onto a Windows PC should be one of the least remarkable features imaginable. While this simple process seems effortless between an iPhone and Mac, Windows users are still left waiting.

Now, Microsoft is formally asking Apple to provide interoperable clipboard access through the company’s European Union interoperability process. The request, submitted on March 25, argues that iOS restrictions prevent third-party platforms from creating an experience comparable to Apple’s Universal Clipboard. Apple has now reached Phase III and committed to developing a solution.

Computing

Chrome wants more extension reviews, but good ratings won’t keep malware out

Google is testing built-in extension review prompts, but good ratings can still hide malware

malicious-google-chrome-extensions-on-web-store

Google is preparing to add extension review links directly inside Chrome, putting feedback closer to the menus people already use to manage their add-ons.

A Chromium change, first spotted by Windows Report, points to review options in the Extensions menu, the chrome://extensions management page, and extension context menus. Only eligible Chrome Web Store extensions in good standing would qualify, and the feature is still under development.

Computing

Passkeys were pushed as a safer future. Hackers have figured out ways to break those synced to Google

Google’s “uncopyable” passkeys may be easier to steal than promised

google-lawsuite-AI-Scams

Passkeys have been pushed as the safer successor to passwords. It promised protection from phishing, credential reuse, and password leaks. Google even claims that it cannot be copied or accidentally handed to someone else. But it might not be as secure as the company wants it to be.

Security researchers (Via BleepingComputer) have now found three ways malware can undermine those promises for passkeys synced through Google Password Manager. The techniques, collectively named Pass-ta-key, target Google Password Manager inside Chrome on Windows computers equipped with a Trusted Platform Module. Every attack requires malware to already be running on the victim’s computer.