Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Gemini’s next trick is hiding in Chrome, and it could change how you browse

An unfinished side panel signals agentic help on the way, with small opt-in steps first and bigger tasks later.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Rocket launch with the Google Chrome logo
Google

What’s happened? Google is testing a Chrome feature called “Contextual tasks” in its Canary build. When enabled via hidden flags, it adds a More Tools entry that opens an unfinished side panel tied to Gemini. The panel currently defaults to the Google homepage or a cut-off Gemini view and does not resize correctly.

  • Spotted by Windows Latest and testers on X, force-enabling the feature shows us a sneak peek of what Google has in store in the future.
  • Google has hinted at its plans for Chrome and AI, with contextual suggestions in the US first, with broader agentic flows under active development.
  • The design echoes Edge’s Copilot rail, hinting at deeper in-browser assistance.

This is important because: This looks like groundwork for a browser that can actually perform steps for you. Hosting Gemini inside Chrome creates a path from a typed request to real clicks and entries across the web.

  • It signals native in-browser steps, letting the prompt perform the navigation and complete forms.
  • A built-in command panel cuts the copy-paste middleman, a common failure point for web assistants.
  • Google has said tasks like grocery orders could shrink from half an hour to a few clicks, and this is the plumbing that could make that happen.
Recommended Videos

Why should I care? Usefulness comes with strings attached. To act on your behalf, an assistant needs permission to read pages, juggle tabs, and interact with data tied to your account. You get convenience, but you also give up potentially sensitive info.

  • Automating tasks means letting AI read what is on screen and sometimes past context.
  • Permissions can sprawl, from page content and form fields to cookies or session state.
  • If bots handle more activity, sites may see fewer human visits and less direct engagement.
  • Users still want an obvious stop button, plus granular scopes they can revoke quickly.

Okay, so what’s next? Microsoft is further along in Edge and Copilot, while Chrome is laying the track in Canary. Expect conservative rollouts and small opt-in steps that expand as controls mature. We’ve tested AI browsers like Dia and Comet to give you a glimpse of the AI browsing experience.

  • From our time with Dia, an AI-first browser can feel effortless on repetitive tasks, but it raises bigger questions about data handling and reliability that Chrome and Edge must answer.
  • In our Comet test, comparisons and summaries were faster, but errors sometimes erased the gains.
Paulo Vargas
Paulo Vargas is an English major turned reporter turned technical writer, with a career that has always circled back to…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more