Skip to main content

AMD, Nvidia Attack Intel on USB 3.0

AMD, Nvidia Attack Intel on USB 3.0

Chipmakers AMD, Nvidia, and Via Technologies—and, reportedly, other companies as well—are apparently tired of waiting for a USB 3.0 spec to be finalized, and are threatening to go off on their own with an alternate USB 3.0 system in order to bring the technology to market faster. The companies apparently believe Intel is holding back the USB 3.0 specification in order to get a jump in the pending market, and is refusing to share the spec with competitors. Not wanting to be left behind, AMD and others are preparing to start work on their own USB 3.0 implementation…and the result could be a marketplace fractured by similar but not-quite-compatible devices.

Nvidia and AMD both declined to comment officially on their position regarding Intel and the USB 3.0 spec, but industry reports have initial meetings for generating a so-called "open" USB 3.0 specification are set for next week.

The USB 3.0 spec is designed to be backward compatible with existing USB connectors, but offer about 5 gigabits per second of bandwidth—that’s about ten times what today’s USB 2.0 connections offer.

For its part, Intel is engaged in active spin control, with Intel’s Nick Knuffler offering a public post to "dispell the myths" about the company’s role in forming the USB 3.0 spec. Knuffler correctly points out that Intel is just one company in the larger USB 3.0 Promoter Group which is creating the USB 3.0 spec: other members incude HP, Microsoft, NEC, and Texas Instruments—with AMD and Nvidia both on board as "contributor" companies. The spec is due to be completed in the second half of 2008.

Separately, Intel is also developing its own host controller specification, which the company maintains is separate from the USB 3.0 specification itself. The host controller spec is a guide to creating actual silicon that supports USB 3.0: Intel says it plans to release the controller spec when it’s completed (probably in the second half of 2008) and make it freely available, just as it did with Wireless USB, USB 2.0, and USB 1.1. Intel concedes anybody can decide to create a USB 3.0 host controller specification, but they’d have to throw "gazillions of dollars and bazillions of man hours" into it—just like Intel. Intel doesn’t want to distribute an unfinished spec, and can’t be sure everything is nailed down until the actual USB 3.0 spec is finalized. So, Intel isn’t yet sharing its USB host controller spec with the world—and that’s making other companies antsy.

However, from the perspective of Intel’s competitors, the lack of a host controller spec—even in preliminary form—means that Intel will have several months head start on the USB 3.0 market once the specification is finalized. They’re not interested in playing catch-up with Intel: they want to be competitive as soon as USB 3.0 hits the street.

USB 3.0 devices are expected to begin reaching consumers in 2009.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Nvidia is bringing ray tracing and DLSS 3 to your car
Cyberpunk 2077 running in a Tesla.

I know it sounds crazy, but a new MediaTek chip powered by Nvidia graphics promises to bring AAA gaming, ray tracing, and the coveted DLSS 3 to your car. The chips I'm talking about are MediaTek's new Dimensity Auto Cockpit, which integrated an Nvidia GPU, along with a host of AI and gaming capabilities.

It's not clear what Nvidia graphics are packed on MediaTek's chips, but clearly, they're using some variation of the Ada Lovelace architecture we see on RTX 40-series GPUs. Those are the only GPUs that support DLSS 3's frame generation capabilities, and they're extremely efficient -- important for a chip packed into a car.

Read more
Nice try, Intel, but AMD 3D V-Cache chips still win
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor.

Intel's freshly released Core i9-14900KS processor is advertised as the fastest CPU in the world, but does that mean AMD can never hope to compete, even with its flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D? Not at all. Each CPU has its merits, and both are insanely powerful in their own right. At this price point and at this performance level, making the right choice is tricky.

Let's zoom in and find out how the Core i9-14900KS and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D stack up against each other, what they excel at, and which one is the better option to buy.
Pricing and availability

Read more
Here’s a shocking reminder of just how far ahead Intel is in race with AMD
Intel Core i5-14600K processor inside its socket.

It's no secret that between Intel and AMD, it's Intel that holds the majority of the market -- but a recent market analysis report really highlights just how much Intel beats both AMD and Apple. While both Intel and AMD make some of the best CPUs, and Apple has its own excellent proprietary silicon, Intel's CPU shipments trump them both. The report tells us that Intel controls a whopping 78% of the PC processor market.

The information comes from Canalys, a PC industry research firm. It's worth noting that it excludes tablets, which would have bumped up Apple's numbers a bit, as well as Qualcomm's. But zooming in on the PC CPU market alone, including desktops and laptops, tells a different story. The research shows a 78% market share for Intel and 13% for AMD, while Apple accounts for about 8% or slightly more. The rest belongs to MediaTek, Qualcomm, and ARM.

Read more