Skip to main content

I’ve used Intel CPUs for years. Here’s why I’m finally switching to AMD

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

I’ve been using Intel CPUs for close to seven years. It started with the Core i7-8700K, but I moved on to the Core i9-10900K, Core i9-12900K, and most recently, the Core i9-13900K, all of which could have occupied a slot among the best processors at different points in time. But after so much time with Team Blue, I’m switching back to AMD.

It comes at an interesting time for Intel and the PC hardware community as a whole, which is currently abuzz about a particular article claiming that Intel is objectively “better” for PC gamers. That’s not what this article is. Instead, I want to walk you through why I chose to use AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D in my gaming PC, and how I came to the decision.

Recommended Videos

Stability struggles

Intel Core i9-13900K sitting on a mousepad.
The Intel Core i9-13900K CPU Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

I’ll never fault AMD or Intel for temporary stability issues. They happen all the time, especially around new hardware launches. AMD struggled with faster memory around the launch of its Ryzen 7000 CPUs, and we constantly see new bugs pop up, with a fix usually following shortly after. That’s not exactly what’s been going on with Intel CPUs as of late.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Last year, there was a plague of “unsupported processor” Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) alerts that made the rounds with Intel’s 13th-gen CPUs and MSI’s supported motherboards. Originally, the blame went to Microsoft, which released a Windows update that initially triggered the error. Then, it shifted to Intel, when a few weeks later, it was discovered that the BSODs were the result of a microcode error.

It’s not the end of the world. There was a mistake, and MSI and Intel worked to fix it within a few weeks without too much hassle. But now, we’re in the middle of another string of instability problems. Some recent high-end Intel CPUs are showing stability issues, and it took months after users initially reported problems before Intel publicly commented on the instability.

We’re seeing new motherboard updates aimed at improving stability for these chips, which comes at the cost of upwards of 9% of your performance. The stability issues only impact a select number of certain unlocked CPU models, but it’s still a problem. If you’re dropping $500 or $600 on a processor, you shouldn’t have to settle for lower performance just because you were one of the unlucky few to get a chip with stability issues.

Blue screen of death on on TV.
Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

For my own part, I experienced constant crashes and BSODs when I was using the Core i9-13900K. Sometimes, I could go several weeks without a problem, while other times, I would see multiple crashes in one night. I haven’t spent enough time with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in my main gaming rig yet to put blame solely on the CPU — but I will say that I haven’t seen any crashes or BSODs yet.

I don’t want to leave the impression that Intel is making these wildly unhinged CPUs that could crash at a moment’s notice. It isn’t, and there’s a reason I’ve used Intel CPUs for so long. But when widespread issues go unaddressed for months, there’s a problem. I’m not sure if there are issues with the hybrid architecture like we saw with the “unsupported processor” error, or if too much power is being pushed to chips to squeeze out extra performance like we’ve seen with recent instability problems. But when I sit down to play games at night, I don’t want to think about either, and so far, I haven’t had to.

Getting your cache

AMD CEO holding 3D V-Cache CPU.
AMD CEO Lisa Su holds a 3D V-Cache CPU. AMD

My main concern with my rig is gaming. I want good performance overall, but not at the expense of frames. Right now, it’s hard to dispute that, for PC gamers, AMD has a unique advantage with its 3D V-Cache CPUs. Based on our testing, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is around 12% faster overall than the Core i9-13900K at 1080p. In some games, like Red Dead Redemption 2, you won’t see any performance difference at all. In games hungry for cache like Far Cry 6, however, we’ve seen upwards of a 39% improvement.

A lot of games don’t need the extra cache, and the performance gap shrinks as you climb in terms of resolutions in most games. But if gaming is your main priority, AMD’s 3D V-Cache parts offer a distinct advantage in certain titles that Intel doesn’t really have an answer for. The argument gets more nuanced lower down the product stack, with CPUs like the Ryzen 5 7600 and Core i5-13600KF duking it out depending on the title, but for pure frame chasers with the right budget, 3D V-Cache mops the floor.

Overall gaming performance for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

You can get by with far less, too. I’m comparing the Ryzen 7 7800X3D to the Core i9-13900K here, but these CPUs aren’t even in the same class. Intel’s chip is about $500 at the time of writing, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is below $400. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D will also generally run cooler, and therefore quieter, under a gaming workload. Intel’s recent CPUs are rather power-hungry, even in mild gaming workloads.

None of this is to say that Intel’s CPUs are bad for gaming — they’re not. The focus is just different. When you look outside of gaming to other productivity benchmarks, Intel holds a significant lead due to the high core counts on its recent chips. If you need productivity prowess and gaming grunt in equal measure, maybe an Intel chip is better for you. For someone like me, who mainly cares about gaming, AMD takes the crown at the moment.

Platform updates

Someone opening AMD's AM5 socket.
MSI

One of the most signficant reasons AMD has gained a foothold in desktop CPUs over the last several years is the AM4 socket. Seven years after AMD introduced the platform, we’re still seeing new CPUs for it. That really culminated with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D in 2022, which showcased how big of a leap AMD had made from its original Ryzen CPUs, all on the same socket.

The AM5 socket, which the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses, is set up for similar longevity. AMD has said it will support the platform until 2025 and beyond. The “beyond” bit is a little vague at the moment, but AMD has said that it “certainly recognized that the longevity of the AM4 platforms was one of the biggest reasons that led to the success of Ryzen,” and the company plans to support the socket “for as long as we possibly can.”

In fairness to Intel, it has tried to do something similar with its LGA 1700 socket, which supports 12th- through 14th-gen CPUs. The main problem is that it isn’t as significant as a jump as it sounds like. If you bought into the platform with the launch of 12th-gen CPUs, you can get a pretty large jump in performance with a 13th- or 14th-gen CPU. There isn’t much reason to upgrade beyond that, however. As you can read in our Core i9-14900K and Core i5-14600K review, these chips offer almost identical performance to their 13th-gen counterparts in most workloads.

It’s still not clear how long AMD will support the AM5 platform beyond 2025, but the company has already proven it can deliver signficant performance improvements over several generations on the same platform. Hopefully, that continues with AM5. At the very least, I’m set up to take advantage of the platform with a Ryzen 7000 CPU.

Sweeping statements

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Just because I switched back to AMD doesn’t mean you necessarily should. It’s always important to recognize that everyone’s needs are different, and that there is never a one-size-fits-all approach to building (or upgrading) a PC. Maybe you need a PC to edit videos and play games at 4K, for example. In that case, an Intel CPU might be a better fit — after all,  the high core count on Intel’s recent chips suit large video-editing workloads better.

You can rarely make sweeping statements about PC hardware, and I’m not making one here. Switching to AMD suits what I’m after with my gaming PC, but I’d encourage you to take stock of what you need out of your PC and consult multiple reviews before making a buying decision. That will take you further than trying to find an objectively better brand out of the two.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs can still consume a ton of power
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel has made a big deal about the efficiency of its upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which are looking to earn a spot among the best processors when they release later this week. Some early benchmark results HXL on X (formerly Twitter) show that the CPUs can still draw a ton of power if you stray from Intel's default power settings, however.

The post, which you can see below, shows the Core Ultra 9 285K peaking at 370 watts of power draw in Cinebench R23's multi-core test. The CPU itself is blacked-out, but you can tell it's the Core Ultra 9 285K from the 24 cores picked up by Cinebench. The Core Ultra 9 285K has a maximum turbo power of 250W, according to Intel, and a base power of 125W.

Read more
AMD is finally recognizing that Ryzen 9000 CPUs are way too expensive
The Ryzen 9 9950X socketed in a motherboard.

AMD is finally cutting prices on its Ryzen 9000 CPUs. After teasing that its long-awaited Ryzen 7 9800X3D will arrive in November, the company revealed that it'll be slashing prices on its existing Ryzen 9000 range by anywhere from $30 to $50 each. Combined with some impressive performance updates, AMD's latest chips have a better shot at a spot among the best processors than they've ever had.

The company describes the price cuts as an early holiday promotion, though it hasn't put an end date on the discounts. The flagship Ryzen 9 9950X is seeing a $50 price cut, while the remainder of the range is reduced by $30. It's a clear jab at Intel's upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs, which go on sale later this week. Similar to the last few generations, Intel is undercutting AMD on pricing, so this promotion brings the scales back in balance.

Read more
Intel is bringing back one of its most frustrating types of CPUs
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

Intel's new Arrow Lake CPUs are a big deal. They utilize an entirely new architecture and come with a new socket, which will help them compete for a spot among the best processors. However, it looks like some upcoming Core 200-series CPUs (the non-Ultra versions) might not use the Arrow Lake/Lunar Lake architecture at all -- they might be rebranded CPUs sporting older CPU tech.

The assumption comes from results in the Crossmark benchmark that were posted to Bapco and first pointed out by Everest on X (formerly Twitter). The result shows the Core 5 210H, but it's not the performance that's interesting. It's the specs. The result shows that the CPU comes with eight cores and 12 threads. That's the rub. Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake don't come with Hyper-Threading, so each core only comes with a single thread.

Read more