Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Space
  3. News

Why are astronauts using aging tech? NASA spaceflight expert has the answers

Add as a preferred source on Google
A NASA spacewalk.
NASA / NASA

Astronauts floating in space using what looks like “old tech” might sound bizarre at first. But as it turns out, there’s a very practical reason behind it. And no, it’s not because NASA is stuck in the past. A recent explanation from NASA spaceflight expert Jason Hutt sheds light on why missions like Artemis still rely on aging hardware, including older Windows tablets.

Why NASA still uses “old” tech in space

According to Hutt, it all comes down to testing, cost, and reliability. Space hardware isn’t something you can just swap out every year like a smartphone. Every single component has to go through extensive certification and testing, which takes years and costs a fortune. So once a device is approved, NASA sticks with it.

By using a device ISS was using, we would save money on certifying the hardware. Every piece of equipment flown has to go through a series of testing. That testing takes time and money. The operations software on the tablet was developed in Windows for ISS, so we needed a windows tablet.

— Jason Hutt (@jthutt.bsky.social) 2026-04-02T17:17:24.791Z

In fact, for missions like Artemis, NASA intentionally chose devices that were already used on the International Space Station. This avoided the need to re-certify new hardware, saving both time and money. The software was also already built for that specific platform, making it the safest and most practical choice.

Recommended Videos

There’s also the timeline problem. Missions are planned years in advance, meaning the “latest” tech at the time of launch is often already outdated by the time astronauts actually fly. But that’s a trade-off NASA is willing to make, because reliability matters far more than cutting-edge performance.

It’s a deliberate decision

Zoom out a bit, and this approach is actually standard across space missions. NASA often prefers older, well-tested components because they’re proven to work in extreme environments like radiation-heavy space. Newer tech might be faster, but it’s also riskier and less predictable.

There are also practical limitations. Deep-space missions don’t have reliable internet as we do on Earth, so software can’t depend on constant connectivity. Add bandwidth constraints and data limits into the mix, and suddenly, modern, cloud-heavy systems stop making sense altogether. In other words, space isn’t the place to experiment with the latest gadgets. It’s where you take the stuff that’s been tested, proven, and trusted.

Varun Mirchandani
Varun is an experienced technology journalist and editor with over eight years in consumer tech media. His work spans…
SpaceX Starship reaches orbit for the first time but its historic flight ends early
Starship reaches orbit for the first time and deploys 26 Starlink satellites before an early splashdown.
spacex-starship

After 13 suborbital test flights and more than $15 billion in development costs, SpaceX's Starship has finally reached orbit. The 407-foot megarocket, the most powerful ever built, lifted off from Starbase, Texas, on Monday and delivered its first real payload on it's 14th attempt. The celebration came with an asterisk, though, since SpaceX had to cut the planned 10-hour mission to roughly three hours.

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/2104601695711904180

Read more
Starship is finally going orbital, and SpaceX has picked September 22
Flight 14 is aiming for orbit, Starlink V3 deployment and a very long day in space.
Starship rocket.

SpaceX is finally ready to give Starship its biggest test yet. The company says the massive rocket's 14th test flight is scheduled for September 22, when it will attempt to put the upper stage into Earth orbit for the first time. The launch is currently pending regulatory approval, with a 75-minute window opening at 7:15 a.m. CT.

Starship has 26 Starlink satellites to deliver

Read more
Want a city on the Moon? Scientists say there’s not enough water
A billion tons still comes up short
Artist impression of activities in a Moon Base.

For decades, humanity has looked up at the Moon and wondered what it would be like to live on it. Think sprawling cities, factories, research centers, and permanent human settlements. Unfortunately, there is one fairly fundamental problem with that vision.

A new study published in Frontiers in Space Technologies argues that even the Moon's potentially enormous reserves of frozen water may be nowhere near enough to support city-sized populations sustainably. Researchers Martin Elvis and Jonathan McDowell estimate that the permanently shadowed regions near the lunar poles could contain roughly one billion tons of water. It sounds like an extraordinary amount until you put a million thirsty humans next to it.

Read more