Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Web
  4. News

Good guy Kickstarter says no to IPO, becomes a public benefit corporation instead

Add as a preferred source on Google

Despite its best attempts at convincing us otherwise, it’s time to call a spade a spade: Technology is not a particularly altruistic industry. Certainly, hundreds upon thousands of startups and tech companies operate under the banner of changing the world or making the world a better place, but often it seems that the “problems” such organizations are trying to solve are more petty than they are pressing. Kickstarter, then, stands out as a breath of fresh air in an overcrowded space, and as of Sunday, the crowdfunding platform is reincorporating as a “public benefit corporation,” which means that they are now bound by law to make a “positive impact on society.” Kickstarter is no longer Kickstarter Inc. — world, meet Kickstarter PBC.

It’s a surprising move for the highly successful company that often serves as a jumping off point for companies that are, perhaps, less altruistically oriented. And in technology, an industry where a billion-dollar valuation and a million users seems to be everyone’s end goal, Kickstarter’s decision to become a public benefit corporation makes its mission and its values very clear — it’s not all about that coin.

Recommended Videos

“We don’t ever want to sell or go public,” Yancey Strickler, Kickstarter’s chief executive told the The New York Times, “That would push the company to make choices that we don’t think are in the best interest of the company.” Instead, Strickler and co-founder Perry Chen have made very clear what Kickstarter’s best interests are — in this case, helping bring creative projects to life, leveraging its unique position as crowdsourcers to aid the public. Under the public benefit corporation label, the company must include a socially responsible and impactful goal in its corporate charter, take public benefit into account in business decisions, and report on social impact.

Kickstarter’s homepage, which pays homage to the announcement, notes, “More and more voices are rejecting business as usual, and the pursuit of profit above all. Positive impact on society becomes part of a benefit corporation’s legally defined goals.” And in an email to its user base, the company said, “Radically, positive impact on society becomes part of a benefit corporation’s legally defined goals.” 

Maintaining full transparency, Kickstarter has posted its benefit corporation charter for all to see, and it spells out a “specific list of values and commitments” by which the company will abide. “We renew our longstanding commitment to arts and culture. We declare how we plan to conduct ourselves in situations that are often swayed by profit motives. And we newly commit to donate 5 percent of annual post-tax profits to arts education and organizations fighting inequality,” Kickstarter promises, “Every year, we’ll release an assessment of how we’re performing on the commitments we’ve made.”

It is telling that “not a single dissenting vote” was made by a Kickstarter shareholder when the time came to make the decision about reincorporating as a benefit corporation. As an organization that is based on community, risk-taking, and a leap of faith for the public good, it comes as little surprise that the people behind the company found their own values similarly aligned with those of a PBC. “From Kickstarter’s inception,” the company says, “We’ve focused on serving artists, creators, and audiences to help bring creative projects to life. Our new status as a benefit corporation hard-codes that mission at the deepest level possible to guide us, and future leaders of Kickstarter.”

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more