Skip to main content

Documents: Uber drivers in two states would have made $730M more as employees

uber rider driver ratings
New numbers show the gap between Uber's settlement offer to California drivers and what they would have paid employees Image used with permission by copyright holder
In Uber’s ongoing pursuit of a settlement with its drivers, the extent of the costs the ride-sharing company would have borne had the drivers been employees rather than contractors has just been clarified. Court documents unsealed this week show that drivers in California and Massachusetts would have received an additional $730 million in expense reimbursements since 2009, according to Reuters.

Neither Uber, nor its closest competitor, Lyft, currently hire their drivers as employees, but rather as independent contractors. The drivers want to be considered employees to be eligible for gas and maintenance reimbursement based on mileage, which they otherwise pay themselves.

If you add the 20 percent tips the drivers would have made, based on Uber’s data on revenues in the two states, and the government-allowed mileage rate, the drivers would have been paid an additional $852 million in all. Uber uses a different rate for mileage reimbursements, and based on that difference, states that the total with tips would have been $429 million.

Last month, Uber offered a $100 million settlement to its drivers in California. The settlement offer has not yet been accepted by the court. In that settlement, drivers would remain contractors. The driver mileage and Uber commission amounts (on which the tip amounts are based) had been redacted in the original settlement. In the process of considering the settlement, a judge in federal court in San Francisco ordered the figures disclosed in order to assess the fairness of the offer. The new numbers show quite a gap between the settlement offer and potential reimbursements, whether calculated with Uber’s mileage rate or the government rate.

Uber’s settlement offer must be approved by the courts. The final question of whether the company’s drivers are employees or contractors will be decided by U.S. regulators.

Editors' Recommendations

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Commerce teams. Bruce uses smart devices…
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more
Cybertruck production reportedly halted over pedal issue
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

Tesla’s Cybertruck has been hit by a production delay caused by an issue with a part of the vehicle, a number of media reports have claimed.

Read more
Don’t let the gimmicks fool you. The Ioniq 5 N is a serious track car
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N drifting.

We’re finally getting to the fun part of automakers’ methodical quest to replicate their lineups with electric cars.

Performance versions of ordinary cars have been a staple of the auto industry for decades. But while we’ve already seen some variants of EVs boasting more power and more impressive stats — think Tesla Model S Plaid or Lucid Air Sapphire — the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the first to truly apply that format to an EV.

Read more