Skip to main content

2012 Chrysler 200 Touring review

2012 chrysler 200 touring review convertible front side top down
2012 Chrysler 200 Touring
MSRP $30.00
“The 2012 Chrysler 200 Touring is the sort of car we want to like, and in some ways we do. But it’s also the type of car that, while charming and likable as our hard-working office interns, is not one we want to spend any prolonged period of time with.”
Pros
  • Powerful and efficient Pentastar V6
  • Impressive fuel economy
  • Comfortable interior
  • Convertible top adds a lot of fun the drive experiene
Cons
  • Lacking tech features
  • Redesign doesn’t do enough to erase memory of the Sebring
  • Muted styling
  • Poor handling and stiff ride
  • Dated audio interface

Most of us (even those without a business degree) would agree that successful branding is a vital aspect to any company. Generally speaking, if you’re product is unappealing, you have two options: go back to the drawing board and invent something awesome, or just polish up that turd and give it a new name. Chrysler, in all its automotive wisdom, has taken a quasi-hybrid approach with its “new” 2012 200 Touring.

Why the overtly skeptical “new” disclaimer? Because, despite its rebadged numerical nomenclature, the Chrysler 200 isn’t exactly all-new. In many ways, it’s a clear-cut derivative of the now-discontinued Sebring, a vehicle that’s spent more time in a fleet that your average sailor. Rather than build an entirely new platform for its Sebring successor, the company has slightly restyled it and given it a shiny new sheetmetal suit.

Nevertheless, having (mostly) put the automotive recessions and bailouts in its rearview, the now Italian-owned automaker has emerged relatively unscathed since the dust settled on Detroit, thanks to an overall increase in vehicle quality, and a few smart and emotive marketing campaigns. Does that improved quality translate to the 200 Touring convertible? Let’s find out, shall we?

Haven’t we met before?

Despite its familiar design, the 2012 Chrysler 200 Touring convertible is not a hideous looking creature. It might not carry the visual cache that others in its segment possess, but it’s smartly styled for what it is. There is a calm, almost stoic, quality to the 200’s exterior styling, and it delivers an understated aesthetic that most will appreciate, but won’t be wowed by. 

2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review exterior front grill touring
Image used with permission by copyright holder
 2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review exterior front angle touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review exterior front touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review red side touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review exterior back angle touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review exterior back touring

At its face, the Chrysler 200 sports a five-tiered, chrome front grille that crosses over into the hood of the car and houses Chrysler’s new winged logo. LED accents have been given to smooth out the front end’s presentation, while chrome detailing flanks the front air scoop’s pursed maw.

Around back, the shape of the taillights have been smoothed out and benefit from an injection of character thanks to the “C” shaped LED outline, while a chrome bar bridges both ends, with Chrysler’s logo once again featuring prominently at the center of the rear. Mopar dual-exhaust tips lend a degree of sportiness to the 200, which we came to appreciate. Still, the 200 does little to visually displace you from the reality that it is ostensibly a redesigned Sebring.

Comfortably dull

There is plenty to like about the 2012 Chrysler Touring convertible’s interior, assuming you don’t mind a more muted cabin. Seating up front is spacious, simple, and provides a great deal of comfort. The three-spoke steering wheel comes wrapped in leather. Here, the buttons for controlling the vehicle’s cruise control, side instrument menu — which sits just to the left of the gauge clusters — and Bluetooth voice commands are laid out in fairly straightforward fashion, while volume control is located right behind the steering wheel.

2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior drivers seat touring
Image used with permission by copyright holder
2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior back angle touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior brake gearstick touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior front from back touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior steering wheel closeup touring   2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior dash steering wheel touring

It’s certainly not the most luxurious or visually impressive cabin we’ve had the pleasure of stepping into, but what the Chrysler 200 lacks in style it manages to make up for in comfort. Up front there is plenty of space for driver and passenger alike, with an admirable amount of room afforded to passengers in the back. And for a convertible, the 200 Touring provides a decent amount of space in its trunk with the convertible top up or down.

Overall, the cabin won’t truly impress, but Chrysler has at least managed to add some life to the party with chrome accents on just about every aspect of the interior, from the shifter to the outline of the drink holders — even to the door handles, which helps inject some soul into an otherwise sterile cockpit.

Technically limited

We like to give credit where it’s due, and as we mentioned before, the 2012 Chrysler 200 Touring is a comfortable car. Standard creature comforts include keyless entry, heated mirrors, cruise control, air-conditioning, AM/FM radio, and a single-disc CD player with MP3 playback.

For the Touring convertible, Chrysler adds 17-inch alloy wheels to replace the standard steel variety, an upgraded transmission (more on that in a minute), automatic headlamps, automatic climate control, a leather-wrapped steering wheel and gear shifter, as well as a six-speaker sound system with satellite radio. Optional upgrades included in our review unit consisted of a Cold Weather Package with heated front seats, an excellent remote start system, and UConnect Voice Command, which adds Bluetooth for audio streaming and phone calls. But by far the greatest feature adorning the 200 Touring is its convertible top, which is made from cloth, takes about 30 seconds to fully open or shut, and is easily operated via a button located above the cup holders.

2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review front side touring bridgeWhile the 200 Touring manages to come with a decent list of amenities, it isn’t crammed full of all the techy goodness we’ve come to love (and expect, really) from a modern automobile, which is widely disappointing. And of the tech-features it did include, the implementation seems more of a poor afterthought. For example, pairing our smartphone was simple enough and worked relatively well — but when using our iPod to listen to music via the remote USB port located under the center console, the 200’s processing power struggled under the weight of our exhaustive library. Granted, we have well above 80 gigs of music, but at this point in the game, reading these devices shouldn’t be difficult.

Adding to the 200 Touring’s tech drought is the absence of a navigation/infotainment system. This is even more intolerable when taking into account the vehicle’s base price, which starts at $26,575, well into the realm of being able to offer a decent system. To be fair, Chrysler does offer a touchscreen audio interface with DVD audio playback and digital music storage, but that is optional. The tech features, or lack thereof, in the 2012 Chrysler 200 is shameful. And when you take into account that our tester topped out at $30,070, but still doesn’t include those features — well, that simply doesn’t fly.

Pentastar power

Two different powertrains are available on the 2012 Chrysler 200 Touring: a standard 2.4-liter four-cylinder that produces 173 horsepower and 166 pound-feet of torque, and an optional 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 mated to a six-speed automatic. Thankfully, our review unit consisted of the latter and was, much to our surprise, rather reactive. Acceleration is strong for the most part, but has difficulty getting up to speed at times. We attribute this to the fact that the 2012 Chrysler 200 Touring is a rather rubenesque ride, tipping the scales at 4600 pounds.

By and large the vehicle works best when sticking to simple task, like highway driving. From the outset we figured the Chrysler 200 for a decent road cruiser and we were right. Task the 200 with more arduous conditions and the hydraulic steering provides some depth and road feel, but generally falls flat. Simply put, the 2012 Chrysler 200 lacks the sort of road manners and sophistication we have come to expect from cars in its class.

2012 Chrysler 200 Convertible review interior engine touringAnother disappointing characteristic rears its ugly head when you ask the 200 to accelerate out of corners at anything above moderate speeds. Here, the influx of torque causes the 200 to lose some stability and requires a firm grasp of the steering wheel to stay afloat. It doesn’t pose too much concern at first, but we imagine it could prove annoying, even dangerous, for some of the “honored citizens” we see populating this vehicle.

Surprisingly, fuel economy in the 200 Touring convertible isn’t as bad as we thought it would be given its weight and hefty engine. EPA-estimated fuel returns sit at 19 mpg in the city, 29 mpg on the highway, and 22 mpg combined. Naturally, fuel estimates on the non-convertible models will return slightly better numbers. Although, given that the best thing about the 200 is the available convertible top, we don’t recommend choosing the sedan model to save a few gallons (sorry, Mother Earth). Also, we’d like to add that while EPA-estimates can often prove meaningless, it seems to be pretty spot on with the 200 Touring, with our returns on par with, if not slightly below, the EPA’s.

Finish line

In sum, the 2012 Chrysler 200 Touring is the sort of car we want to like, and in some ways we do. But it’s also the type of car that, while charming and likable as our hard-working office interns, is not one we want to spend any prolonged period of time with. Chrysler can and should be credited for improving upon the old Sebring with the 200 –the redesigned and upgraded interior is admittedly well done and does a lot to propel the vehicle forward quality-wise — but the automaker just hasn’t done enough to warrant a place for the 200 in your garage. Add to that an archaic, lacking list of tech features, and stiff, unresponsive handling, and the deck is just completely stacked against the 200. Not even its impressive fuel economy and throaty engine can rescue this one from its doldrums. Perhaps the only saving grace is its convertible top — but how many of us live in places where we can make use of it year round? Oh, that’s right, Florida, where we imagine a large majority of 200s will live out their days spinkled about many a Hertz lot. In the meantime, we’d rather wait for a complete design overhaul from Chrysler.

Highs:

  • Powerful and efficient Pentastar V6
  • Impressive fuel economy
  • Comfortable interior
  • Convertible top adds a lot of fun the drive experiene

Lows:

  • Lacking tech features
  • Redesign doesn’t do enough to erase memory of the Sebring
  • Muted styling
  • Poor handling and stiff ride
  • Dated audio interface 

Editors' Recommendations

Amir Iliaifar
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Associate Automotive Section Editor for Digital Trends, Amir Iliaifar covers the ever increasing cross-section between tech…
Tesla’s fix for faulty Cybertruck pedal is simpler than you might think
Tesla Cybertruck

Less than five months after handing over the first Cybertrucks to customers, Tesla has had to recall the electric pickup to fix an issue with the accelerator.

In a notice issued on Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said that the recall impacts Cybertruck vehicles manufactured from November 13, 2023, to April 4, 2024. This suggests that all -- or almost all -- of the 3,878 Cybertrucks being recalled are those that have been manufactured to date.

Read more
Ford Mustang Mach-E 2024 vs. Mach-E 2023: What’s new in Ford’s electric Mustang?
Blue Ford Mustang Mach-E on a rooftop

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is easily one of the best EVs for the price, offering a solid range, sleek design, and pretty good tech on the inside. In recent years, it has gotten even cheaper -- thanks in large part to a price war between it and the Tesla Model 3. And, the company just took the wraps off of the latest and greatest version of the Mach-E, labeled as the 2024 model.

The 2024 Mustang Mach-E is notably different from the 2023 iteration in some meaningful ways. So much so that we decided to take a look at the two head-to-head -- to see if it was better to pay for the 2024 model or save some cash on any remaining 2023 stock.
Design
The Mustang Mach-E looks relatively unique -- in a good way. And thankfully, Ford has largely kept the overall design the same for the 2024 model, at least when it comes to the more consumer-focused models. The car retains the slatted taillights and crossover size. It also offers a large selection of colors, including the very blue Grabber Blue Metallic, as well as Rapid Red Metallic. It's a good selection of colors, and there should be an option for most buyers.

Read more
Tesla to begin production on new, more affordable models
Tesla Model 3

With competition increasing from Chinese and other automakers, Tesla boss Elon Musk revealed on Tuesday that his company is planning to begin production of new, more affordable models in “early 2025, if not late this year.” Notably, that's earlier than the previously stated date of late 2025, though whether Musk actually succeeds in meeting the earlier production time frame is another question entirely.

The news came as Tesla released its latest quarterly figures. Revenue for the electric vehicle maker came in at $21.3 billion, down from the $23.3 billion it reported for the same three-month period a year earlier and also down from the $25.2 billion reported in the previous quarter. Profit reached $1.1 billion, marking a 55% fall compared to the same period a year ago.

Read more