Skip to main content

2011 Dodge Durango Crew Review

2011-dodge-durango-crew-front-angle
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Like a MacBook Air on four wheels, the Dodge Durango Crew is a unibody wonder for those who appreciate sleek styling and creature comforts. Redesigned for the modern age of better fuel economy and sleek transport devices, the 2011 model – which is all new for this year after a brief one-year hiatus – is built on the same platform as the Jeep Cherokee instead of the Dodge Dakota (now Ram Dakota). For those familiar with how the Cherokee drives, the Durango felt quite similar. Yet, this is an SUV that emphasizes style over sheer mud-slinging brawn.

And believe us when we tell you: we tried to sling some mud. Over the course of several days, we drove the Durango on a wet farm road – the same one where we tested the Jeep Cherokee and Ford Explorer in winter, and several recent HD trucks like the Ram Laramie Longhorn HD 2500.

2011-dodge-durango-crew-side-profile
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Durango Crew we tested does not have a dedicated 4×4 mode, so in some ways, this SUV with a third-row seat has more in common with the 2011 Chevy Traverse. At first glance, the Durango looks like a vehicle an attorney would drive: The single-body construction is sleek and angular, with a slight hint of a minivan’s elongated look (at least, the recent models from Chrysler, Honda, and Toyota). Our silver model really did remind us of a MacBook Air – the wrap-around shell, the glimmering silver.

Recommended Videos

Out on the road, the Durango drove more like a car than a truck, with tight steering compared to previous models and excellent cornering control despite its almost obnoxious weight of nearly 5,000 pounds (or about 300 pounds heavier than the Ford Explorer).

On the farm road, the new Durango held its own. There was no side-to-side swaying as we experienced with a couple of Nissan models last spring. The Durango uses a 50-50 split differential AWD that lacks the adaptive intelligence of the Ford Explorer, or the ability to adjust for specific road conditions. Wheels started slipping, and the Durango just powered through the mud almost by sheer will. On a gravel road, the Durango felt sure and solid, mostly due to the front and rear differentials.

2011-dodge-durango-crew-rear
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Our Durango had a 3.7-liter V6 with 290-horsepower and 260-lb-ft of torque. There’s also a premium version of the Durango that comes with a 360-horsepower V8. The V6 version we tested delivered about 20 miles per gallon – it’s rated for 23 highway. Towing capacity on the V8 model is best in class at 7,400 pounds. Oddly, the Durango has a five-speed automatic transmission that tended to lurch and drag a bit in the upper gears, although most people won’t drive it pell-mell on a farm road or take corners at 75mph.

Inside, it’s all about luxury appointments. We liked the tone and styling of the interior better than the Ford Explorer, which just has a bit of a tough-guy aesthetic. The Durango interior seems like it is designed to work well when you step out of the driver’s seat at a Las Vegas casino. The only really muscular component inside is the floor-mounted shifter, which is big and bulky.

In the center stack, there’s a button for enabling the rear passenger two-prong power outlet, and one that flips down the third-row head rests in prep for folding them down. You can connect up your iPhone using the USB port, or stream over Bluetooth. We had no problems with audio playback, and even tested out a USB thumb drive loaded with a collection of WAV and MP3 files, and they all played fine.

2011-dodge-durango-crew-steering-wheel
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There wasn’t an LCD screen for the second-row passengers, but the touchscreen in front looked bright and clear. Also, in the Crew version we tested, there’s no sunroof – a slight disappointment. Rear seating is extremely wide and comfortable, even in the far back – the third row is not just for kids. The middle seats fold up easily, and the third row seats flip forward. There’s almost 85 cubic inches of space with all rear seats folded down, which is a bit less than other SUVs in this model year.

So, what’s the real story here, compared to the Explorer and Traverse? We think the Durango fits somewhere in the middle. The Explorer has a beefier drive that plows over snow banks and dirt piles – you can adjust the settings for current road conditions. We remember driving the Explorer on a thick sheet of ice for about 90 miles, and we’re not sure how the Durango would fare. The Traverse drove more like a car and was even less convincing as a true SUV that won’t get stuck in mud, but several passengers also commented on how smooth the ride felt. Meanwhile, the Jeep Cherokee had a better stereo and, like the Explorer, has settings for particular road conditions.

The Durango offers a comfortable ride, the steering is tighter, and the exterior styling is definitely more modern. You might buy the Durango, at $33,420, to impress a client, but you’d want the Explorer if you and the client were going to drive in a sand pit or over a glacier lake in winter. No other SUV quite has the elegant appeal of the Durango, though, and that counts for some serious cred.

John Brandon
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Faraday Future could unveil lowest-priced EV yet at CES 2025
Faraday Future FF 91

Given existing tariffs and what’s in store from the Trump administration, you’d be forgiven for thinking the global race toward lower electric vehicle (EV) prices will not reach U.S. shores in 2025.

After all, Chinese manufacturers, who sell the least expensive EVs globally, have shelved plans to enter the U.S. market after 100% tariffs were imposed on China-made EVs in September.

Read more
Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs. Tesla Model Y: Does electric SUV beat the bestselling EV?
Hyundai Ioniq 9 driving

The long-awaited Hyundai Ioniq 9 is finally on the way, after months of waiting for what many hope will be a  true competitor to the Kia EV9. The electric SUV is likely to be one of the go-to options for those who want a larger EV at a lower price than the likes of the Rivian R1S. But, while it's larger than the Tesla Model Y, it's also likely to be a little more expensive.

The two vehicles are a bit different when it comes to things like performance, range, and charging. Is the Hyundai Ioniq 9 worth the extra cash, or should you go for the cheaper, yet smaller car? We put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The overall designs of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Tesla Model Y are pretty different, and that may be enough to sway your buying decision. The Ioniq 9 is a true SUV; it's big and boxy, and while it looks a little sleeker than some SUVs thanks to its curved roofline, it's clearly larger than the Tesla Model Y. At the front of the Ioniq 9 is a long light bar separated into pixel-like blocks that helps give the vehicle a unique design motif. At the rear of the Ioniq 9, you'll also find pixel lights curving around the sides and top of the trunk. The Ioniq 9 measures 199.2 inches long, 78 inches wide, and 70.5 inches high.

Read more
Volvo EX90 vs Tesla Model Y: Is Tesla’s cheaper EV also better?
2025 Volvo EX90 front quarter view.

The Volvo EX90 is finally here. The all-electric Volvo SUV was first unveiled a few years ago, but after some delays, the sleek Scandinavian vehicle is now available for order. As an electric SUV, it will go up against the likes of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Kia EV9. However, it will also have to compete with the most popular electric vehicle out there: the Tesla Model Y.

There are some clear differences between the two vehicles. While the Volvo EX90 is noticeably larger, the Tesla Model Y is significantly cheaper. Should you spend the extra cash for Volvo’s electric SUV, or should you opt for the Tesla?
Design
Perhaps the most obvious difference between the two vehicles lies in their design. The EX90 is more of a traditional SUV, featuring a big, boxy build that’s larger than the arguably crossover-sized Tesla Model Y. Beyond basic dimensions, however, there are plenty of other design differences. For instance, the Volvo EX90 has a more traditional appearance compared to the Model Y, which, despite being on the market for some time, remains relatively unique when compared to vehicles from other manufacturers. That’s not to say the EX90 looks dated — on the contrary, it’s sleek and stylish, showcasing Volvo’s signature design.

Read more