Skip to main content

2014 Infiniti Q50S review

2014 Infiniti Q50S front angle
Image used with permission by copyright holder
2014 Infiniti Q50S
MSRP $43,650.00
“The 2014 Infiniti Q50S might be one of the best-looking luxury sport sedans on the American market today. Beyond that, however, it’s a bit confused.”
Pros
  • Exterior styling
  • Butter-smooth powertrain
  • Crisp sport suspension
Cons
  • Incongruent Infiniti InTouch infotainment
  • Lifeless power steering

“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

Let’s skip the pleasantries. Rather than buttering up this review by recalling Infiniti’s finer days, with its M45 or G37, how about we just get to the meat of the thing, shall we?

Recommended Videos

The Infiniti Q50S is one of the best looking, smoothest driving, and most confused cars on the road today.

Its features run the gamut from god-awful to awe-inspiring – and everything in between. It’s left me wanting to both high-five its designers and also spit in their coffee.

It, then, is a fun car to write about … but being interesting on paper doesn’t a good car make. There’s so much to say about this thing, so let’s just start at the very beginning (a very good place to start) with its gorgeous front end.

Paleo Diet

For the last several years, I’ve found Infinitis to be horrendous looking things.

Someone, it seemed, back at the home Japan office got the idea in his or her head that chiseled was out and that bulbous was in. The result was a line of cars that looked like they had the mumps – or had been severely stung by bees.

Thankfully, along with a new naming scheme that I won’t bother to mentioning here, Infiniti has resculpted its line, starting with the Q50. Amazingly, it’s done a bang-up job. After putting the formerly badged G37 sedan on a strict Paleo Diet, the resulting Q50 looks very handsome indeed. I dare say that it’s one of the best-looking sports sedans on the American roads today.

It’s not just handsome; it’s efficient, too. The doors have been redesigned to make getting in and out of the car easier. And the drag coefficient has dropped to 0.26, which is very slippery indeed.

Finally, the mid-size Infiniti sedan looks the part of a BMW-fighter. The same can’t be said for the rest of the car, however.

Two screens

Stepping inside, we find a very comfortable cabin that is distinctively Infiniti. What do I mean by that? Aside from the overuse of purple accent lighting (sorry, gents, this isn’t a Prince music video), buyers will find well-shaped seats, plenty of passenger room, and a dashboard that appears to have been pulled directly from a Nissan … but with extra stuff bolted on.

Aside from the exterior looks, the Q50S’ powertrain is its best feature.

The most offensive of these bolt-ons is the new touchscreen, called Infiniti InTouch next-generation Human Machine Interface, which resides beneath the now-ancient satnav screen in the center of the dash. Now, normally, a new touchscreen that is as intuitive and works as well as the one in the Q50 would receive top marks in my book. Installing it below the aforementioned navigation unit, though, is like adding insult to injury.

Infinitis have always been fairly nice on the inside, if not a bit garish. In recent years, though, the brand’s interior quality has been undermined by the nearly decades-old Nissan navigation system. Yes, it serves a purpose, but so does Veterans Administration … need I say more?

Rather than remove the old nav system from the new Q50 model, Infiniti designers added a supplemental touchscreen beneath it, which handles all other, normal infotainment tasks like phone pairing, radio, and climate control, that used to be controlled through that one nav screen – or by a series of buttons.

2014 Infiniti Q50S interior front
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While the new InTouch interface is nice to look at and brilliant to use, it’s a bit of an oddity. It’s a stark reminder that, when creating the new Q50, Infiniti wanted to spend money to make it nice … but not too much money.

“Integrate the nav into the new touchscreen, eh? Millions you say? No, let’s just put the old nav above the new screen. Then give it a marketing-speak, buzzword-y name.” It’s the incongruity of the two screens that stands as a metaphor for the rest of the car: all the best bits are nearly ruined by the poorly thought-out extras.

Having set that tone, let’s continue to the driving dynamics.

Smooth and limp

Infiniti made a name for itself with its 3.7-liter V6. Over the years, and through its applications, it’s been many things: buzzy and fast all the way to gravely and slow. Now, though, engineers have finally refined it to its finest form. Under the hood of the Q50S, it makes 328 horsepower and 269 pound-feet of torque. Thankfully, the 3.7 is now surprisingly buttery and also very, very quick – capable of 0 to 60 in around 5.0 seconds.

I dare say the Q50S one of the best-looking sports sedans on the American roads today.

All the 3.7’s power is routed through a very keenly geared seven-speed automatic transmission, which sends power to the rear wheels. Aside from the exterior looks, the Q50S’ powertrain is its best feature. The engine provides V8 levels of power, while also returning V6 levels of efficiency. Infiniti estimates the Q50S to achieve 20 mpg city, 29 highway, and a combined score of 23.

The brakes, too, are quite good. They’re sharp without being overly grabby and – at least from my several heart-rate-raising drives – virtually fade free. And the S’ sporty suspension held the body flat in hard cornering, but didn’t rattle my teeth out of my head over uneven road surfaces.

The driving brilliance ends there, I am afraid. The electric steering was absolutely lifeless and numb. German automakers have made some numb steering systems lately, but this one takes the cake. It all but ruined an otherwise excellent driving experience.

2014 Infiniti Q50S engine macro
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This, unfortunately, was the normal setup. Infiniti also offers something called “Direct Adaptive Steering”, which removes the physical connection between the steering wheel and the wheels. I’ve not yet driven this DAS system, but, given the lifelessness of the standard unit, I am sure it’s nightmarish.

Ultimately confused

The Infiniti Q50S has some excellent points. And it has some downsides, too. Frankly, every car in this sport luxury sedan does. Unlike its competitors, though, the Q50S doesn’t feel like a complete, cohesive unit.

It feels confused and like a car designed with a mixed budget. Exterior styling was given all the money it needed, as was powertrain. The interior folks were given – I’d wager – about 25 percent fewer funds than they needed. While the steering team’s budget consisted of a can with a few old nickels at the bottom.

The 2014 Q50S would have been a fine offering in, say, 2007. Right now, though, it feels eight years behind the curve.

When it comes down to it, the $46,000 versions of the Audi A4 and BMW 328i are nicer on the inside, offer a more well-rounded driving experience, and are perceived to be more up-market than the Infiniti.

I’ll give Infiniti credit for trying to spice up its mid-size sedan. But it’s a bit too little too late – and certainly not enough to defeat the Germans.

Highs

  • Exterior styling
  • Butter-smooth powertrain
  • Crisp sport suspension

Lows

  • Incongruent Infiniti InTouch infotainment
  • Lifeless power steering
Nick Jaynes
Former Automotive Editor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more