Skip to main content

Tech, tires and tears at 24 Hours of Le Mans

One car, three drivers, nine sets of tires, and 24 hours: the ingredients of the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

Run each year since 1923, the 24 Hours of Le Mans race was originally created to demonstrate the reliability of the automobile. Over the last 91 years, it has become the most significant motorsports event on the planet.

Just shy of 300,000 spectators bustled around the race grounds this year, eager to catch what is essentially year zero – a rebirth – of the aging event. New regulations brought new cars, new automakers, and reignited passions to the 24-hour race. June 14 was opening day in Le Mans, France, a small, indistinguishably European town that is annually overrun for the race. Also overrun are the town’s roads. The circuit is just shy of 8.5 miles around; the racers will drive it hundreds of times.

The sun was out and the sky was clear as the racers lined up in the starting grid this year, the teams and the spectators alike knowing that anything could happen. Pedigree, budget, and technology could all be nullified on the hallowed Le Mans circuit.

Over the next 24 hours, the cars would travel more than the distance between Los Angeles and New York. They would see speeds over 200 mph, face a blinding sunset, drive through tire blowouts and collisions, and watch for sudden rains.

And it always rains at Le Mans.

Crash

As a lifelong fan of motorsport, I’ve been to many events. I’ve been to Formula 1, NASCAR, local drag races, and karting events. I’d never been to Le Mans, but of all the events I had been to, nothing particularly exciting had ever occurred during qualifying.

Audi’s No. 1 car had crashed at over 215 mph, for a devastatingly total vehicle loss.

I landed in Le Mans on June 10 during the first qualifying sessions, after a 15-hour flight from the West Coast, and I was greeted with shocking news. Audi’s No. 1 car – an R18 e-tron quattro LMP1– had crashed at over 215 mph, for a devastatingly total vehicle loss. Amazingly, driver Loic Duval walked away with only a few bumps and bruises.

That meant, in order to compete with all three of its allowed cars, Audi would have to rebuild its No. 1 car over night, a simply staggering task. Harnessing all of its German magic, that’s exactly what the company did. By midnight that night, Audi had performed a virtual miracle and built a new No. 1 car from spares.

Contenders

On the morning of the race, battered but bandaged, reigning Le Mans champ Audi faced off against two formidable opponents: Toyota and Porsche.

A hybrid engine, in accordance with the new race rules, powers each of the LMP1 cars. Each hybrid, however, has its own bent.

Toyota entered 2014 Le Mans with twin TS040s. Powered by 3.7-liter gasoline V8s mated to a requisite hybrid system, the cars each produce as much as 986-horsepower, making them the fastest vehicles at Le Mans. Rather than onboard batteries, like road-going Toyota hybrids, the TS040’s hybrid system is capacitor-based.

While Toyota went gasoline V8, Porsche’s 919s were powered by gasoline burning, 500-horsepower, 2.0-liter V4s. The Porsches rely on lithium-ion batteries to store its hybrid electric energy. Unlike its competitors, Porsche determined the extra power provided by the batteries outweighed their significant mass.

Audi R18 e-tron quattro #1
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Last but certainly not least, Audi entered 2014 Le Mans with a trio of diesel hybrids. The cars are all new for 2014, with V6 TDI engines that have been completely redesigned and enlarged to 4.0 liters and mated to a flywheel-based hybrid system.

Toyota was set up for straight-line speed. Audi was set for cornering. And Porsche, with its low-slung 919s, was a mix between the two.

The rest

Le Mans isn’t just LMP1 cars; there are several other classes as well, further complicating the race. Though LMP1 is the main event, other cars are running the 24 hours.

Beneath LMP1 there’s LMP2, GTE Pro, and GTE AM. The P2 cars are essentially older versions of the P1s, where the GTE Pro and AM classes are closer to road-going cars. So, if the race weren’t difficult enough, as the P1s round the track against each other, they’re dodging and passing modified versions of the Ferrari 458 Italia, Porsche 911, Corvette C7, and Aston Martin V8 Vantage.

Rain

The race started at 3 p.m. as blue, sunny skies began to emerge, with Toyota and Porsche leading the grid. Early on, the three LMP1 contenders jockeyed for first place. Not more than a few hours into Le Mans 2014, though, the rain started.

Bonanomi closed his helmet and wept, knowing Le Mans was over for him.

At first, it was localized to the Mulsanne corner of the roughly 8.5-mile track. Soon it spread, a heavy deluge covering the track within minutes. Video feeds from inside the cabins of the cars showed visibility dropping to virtually nil – along with traction. Racing slicks, while good for grip, turn to ice in the rain.

The racers remained cautious but also keen to keep pace. The rain saturation across the track mixed with the cars’ traction capabilities into a delicate dance between competition and collision. It seemed as though the racers were keeping their cars in control when catastrophe struck.

Trying to avoid a Toyota TS040, a pair of Ferraris going for a gap caused a three-car pileup. The Toyota and one of the Ferraris suffered only mild front-end damage. The No. 3 Audi R18 was not so lucky. It suffered severe front- and rear-end damage, including damage to the powertrain.

Driver Marco Bonanomi tried futilely for several minutes to get the No. 3 going again, knowing if he could get back to the garage he, just like Duval before him, would simply be down but not out.

Audi R18 e-tron quattro LMP1
Image used with permission by copyright holder

After several minutes of revving with absolutely no movement, the Audi team called in the tow truck. Bonanomi closed his helmet and wept, knowing Le Mans was over for him — and his teammates assigned to car No. 3, Filipe Albuquerque and Oliver Jarvis. This left Audi cars No. 1 and No. 2 to compete for the win.

Defeat

After the rain dried up, racing returned to normal for the surviving cars. Audi, just like Toyota and Porsche, was down to two cars.

At nightfall around 10 p.m., Toyota took the lead with Audi and Porsche trading second and third. Having already driven more than 1,2000 miles, the cars, drivers, and mechanics were already drained but also only one third of the way through.

As the sun rose, with 10 hours left in the race, Audi and Porsche were left to battle for first.

Nighttime at Le Mans is relatively quiet, save the riotous exhaust notes. Teams hunker down. Drivers set a rhythm. And the spectators mostly sleep.

Over the course of the night, the swift Toyotas solidified their position at the front, gaining a 2-minute lead over second place. That changed just around dawn.

As the sun began to peek over the horizon, the No. 7 Toyota suffered a wiring loom failure and came to a rest at the side of the circuit. When it was towed back to the garage, it, too, retired from the race.

As the sun rose, with 10 hours left in the race, Audi and Porsche were left to battle for first.

Power

Just after 5 a.m. the No. 2 Audi took the now-retired Toyota’s place at the head of the pack, with André Lotterer at the helm.

Almost unbelievably, just like the Toyota before it, disaster struck the leading Audi. As Lotterer increased his lead, a turbocharger and fuel injector failed. The No. 2 car was pulled into the garage, while Audi fans waited impatiently for its return.

Porsche 919
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Just over 23 minute elapsed before the car was pushed back out, which had all but removed it from the running, dropping it down to third place. In a race where the leaders are often separated by a 5-second margin, 23 minutes is an eternity.

This, then, was Porsche’s time to shine. Few expected the relative newcomer to 2014 Le Mans to lead going into the second day, but it did. Keen to solidify its place at the top of the leader board, Porsche put veteran driver Mark Webber behind the wheel to battle Audi’s Tom Kristensen of No. 1 Audi, the winningest Le Mans driver of all time, for first.

That’s when disaster struck again for Audi. The turbocharger on the No. 1 car failed – just as it had on the No. 2 R18. Suddenly Kristensen’s lead was dashed.

A full 17 minutes ticked by as Webber and Lotterer, who had been knocked to third, fought for first. Audi’s mechanics teams had been able to scrub 5 minutes off its turbo replacement job for two reasons: efficiency and burned hands.

The turbochargers are so hot during the race that severe burns are inevitable, even through work gloves. So not only did the team get more efficient for the second turbo swap, their hands had already been so burned by the first job that they no longer had to fight through the pain. Their nerves were already numbed.

Meanwhile, the cars destroyed the pavement at Le Mans. While Audi’s mechanics seared their fingers swapping the turbo swap on the No. 1 car, Lotterer set a new lap record for the 2014 race at 3 minutes, 22.567 seconds. Not only was this the fastest of 2014, it was faster than any 2013 lap times – using 25 percent less energy.

Curse

Despite Lotterer’s best efforts and incredible lap times, it seemed his 23-minute deficit simply couldn’t be overcome.

That’s when the No. 20 Porsche suddenly went sluggish. Just a few minutes behind the wheel, hoping to steal first place, Webber’s car failed and had to be nursed back to the garage.

For the last several laps, the Audis drove side-by-side.

This put the No. 14 Porsche into first, with Lotterer hot on its heels and Kristensen not far behind.

Not 40 minutes later, watching from the paddock, I noticed the leading Porsche didn’t sound right as it passed. On the next lap, it pulled into the pits, only to be yanked into the garage, never to return again.

Several minutes went by before No. 14 Porsche had to retire its second and final car from 2014 Le Mans. This gave No. 2 Audi the lead, with its brother car, the No. 1, at second.

Flag

For the last several laps, the Audis drove side-by-side, as all the teams ran out of their garages and climbed up on the pit wall to watch the last few moments of the 24 Hours of Le Mans 2014.

As the clock struck 3 p.m. and the Audis finished their last lap, pandemonium broke out at the Audi end of the paddocks. Audi flags were handed out and the Audi team members jumped and waved their arms.

Audi R18 e-tron quattro LMP1
Image used with permission by copyright holder

As they crossed the finish line, the drivers opened their doors and waved to the crowds. Surprisingly, the Porsche mechanics had repaired the No. 14 enough for it to slowly lap the track, following the champion Audis.

Historically, the winning cars take a partial parade lap at the end of the Le Mans, the Audis, however, took an entire lap of the circuit – fitting for this new year zero.

Once the Audis returned to the garage, the drivers and head of Audi motorsport, Dr. Wolfgang Ullrich, jumped on the No. 1 and No. 2 cars and drove to the end of the pits and the podium. There, to the soundtrack of thousands of screaming fans, Marcel Fässler, André Lotterer, and Benoît Tréluyer were presented with the 24 Hours of Le Mans trophy.

It was one of the most exciting events in Le Mans history. But beyond that, its results will have far-reaching ramifications for forthcoming race seasons and for consumer car technology. In fact, the technology developed for the 2014 Le Mans, including laser headlights and electric turbochargers, is already reaching the street.

In the days to come, we’ll look more closely into the significance and ramifications of the 2014 Le Mans results, so be sure to check back soon.

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Audi halts vehicle deliveries to the U.S. as it mulls impact of tariffs
2021 Audi Q5

If you’d been thinking of buying an Audi, now might be the time.  The German brand, owned by the Volkswagen Group, has announced it would halt shipments to the U.S. in the wake of President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on all imported vehicles.
Audi is currently holding cars that arrived after the tariffs took effect, on April 3, in U.S. ports. But it still has around 37,000 vehicles in its U.S. inventory, which should be able to meet demand for about two months, according to Reuters.
Automakers on average hold enough cars to meet U.S. demand for about three months, according to Cox Automotive.
Audi should be particularly affected by the tariffs: The Q5, its best-selling model in the U.S., is produced in Mexico, while other models, such as the A3, A4, and A6 are produced in Germany.
Holding shipments is obviously a temporary measure to buy time for Audi and parent company Volkswagen. If tariffs stay in place, vehicle prices would likely have to go up accordingly, unless some production is shifted to the U.S. Volkswagen already has a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and is planning a new plant in South Carolina. That latter plant, however, isn’t expected to be operational until 2027 and is currently dedicated to building electric vehicles for VW’s Scout Motors brand.
Other global automakers have also taken drastic measures in response to Trump’s tariffs. Jaguar Land Rover on April 5 said it is pausing shipments of its its UK-made cars to the United States this month. The British sports-luxury vehicle maker noted that the U.S. market accounts for nearly a quarter of its global sales, led by the likes of Range Rover Sports, Defenders, and Jaguar F-PACE.
And on April 3, Nissan, the biggest Japanese vehicle exporter to the United States, announced it will stop taking new U.S. orders for two Mexican-built Infiniti SUVs, the QX50 and QX55.

Read more
Waymo faces questions about its use of onboard cameras for AI training, ads targeting
Two people exit a Waymo taxi.

In an iconic scene from the 2002 sci-fi film Minority Report, on-the-run Agent John Anderton, played by Tom Cruise, struggles to walk through a mall as he’s targeted by a multitude of personalized ads from the likes of Lexus, Guinness and American Express, everytime hidden detectors identify his eyes.
It was clearly meant as a warning about a not-so-desirable dystopian future.
Yet, 23 years later that future is at least partlially here in the online world and threatens to spread to other areas of daily life which are increasingly ‘connected’, such as the inside of cars. And the new testing grounds, according to online security researcher Jane Manchun Wong, might very well be automated-driving vehicles, such as Waymo’s robotaxis.
On X, Wong unveiled an unreleased version of Waymo’s privacy policy that suggests the California-based company is preparing to use data from its robotaxis, including interior cameras, to train generative AI models and to offer targetted ads.
“Waymo may share data to improve and analyze its functionality and to tailor products, services, ads, and offers to your interests,” the Waymo’s unreleased privacy statement reads. “You can opt out of sharing your information with third parties, unless it’s necessary to the functioning of the service.”
Asked for comments about the unreleased app update, Waymo told The Verge that it contained “placeholder text that doesn’t accurately reflect the feature’s purpose”.
Waymo’s AI-models “are not designed to use this data to identify individual people, and there are no plans to use this data for targeted ads,” spokesperson Julia Ilina said.
Waymo’s robotaxis, which are operating on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin, do contain onboard cameras that monitor riders. But Ilina says these are mainly used to train AI models for safety, finding lost items, check that in-car rules are followed, and to improve the service.
The new feature is still under development and offers riders an opportunity to opt out of data collection, Ilina says.
But as we all get used to ads targeting based on everything that’s somehow connected to the web, it seems a once-distant vision of the future may be just around the corner.

Read more