Skip to main content

Hold the phone! New study says talking and driving not as dangerous as we think

hold the phone new study says talking and driving not as dangerous we thought on
Image used with permission by copyright holder

According to a joint study conducted by Carnegie Mellon University and the London School of Economics, cell phone use while driving may not be responsible for causing more automotive accidents on the road.

“Using a cellphone while driving may be distracting, but it does not lead to higher crash risk in the setting we examined,” said Saurabh Bhargava, assistant professor of social and decision sciences at CMU’s Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences, in a press release. “While our findings may strike many as counterintuitive, our results are precise enough to statistically call into question the effects typically found in the academic literature.”

Apparently, researchers examined calling and crash data from 2002 to 2005, before and after 9:00 p.m., a period of time, the study points out, when many mobile carriers offered plans allowing free calls on weekdays after 9 p.m.

Despite a seven percent hike in call volume at 9:00 p.m., an examination of approximately 8 million crashes across nine states and fatal crashes across the nation concluded that crash rates did not increase after that hour.

Simply put, researchers found that increased cell phone usage after that time period had no effect on crash rates.

What’s more, researchers also analyzed the effects of legislation banning cell phone use while driving in several states, and found no effect on crash rates either.

While the study provides answers that run counter to what many would consider common sense, namely that distractions like talking on the phone while driving will more than likely hamper an individual’s ability to focus entirely on the road, thereby increasing the risk of an accident, the research brings up an interesting point.

“One thought is that drivers may compensate for the distraction of cellphone use by selectively deciding when to make a call or consciously driving more carefully during a call,” Bhargava said. Suggesting that at the very least, policymakers should revisit the presumptive notion that talking on a cellphone and driving is as dangerous as it’s currently perceived.

However, Bhargava’s research partner at the London School of Economics, Vikram S. Pathania, was careful to add a cautionary note to all their findings, noting that “our study focused solely on talking on one’s cellphone. We did not, for example, analyze the effects of texting or Internet browsing, which has become much more popular in recent years. It is certainly possible that these activities pose a real hazard.”

Tell us your thoughts? Do you think blanket cell phone bans make sense, or should activities like texting and driving be banned, while talking is permitted? Tell us in comments.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Amir Iliaifar
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Associate Automotive Section Editor for Digital Trends, Amir Iliaifar covers the ever increasing cross-section between tech…
Mercedes-Benz EQG: range, price, release date, and more
Concept image of the larger electric G-Wagon

The G-Class is going electric. We already knew that Mercedes-Benz was working on an electric, small-size G-Wagon, but it looks like the company is also working on a larger G-Class SUV, in the form of the EQG. In fact, Mercedes has gone as far as to show off a concept version of the off-roader.

While there's much we don't know about what will become the production model of the EQG, Mercedes has also shared a lot about it. Curious about whether the Mercedes-Benz EQG could be the EV for you? Here's everything we know so far.
Design
Fear not -- the EQG will retain many of the design aspects of the G-Class that you already know and love but with a modern face-lift. The EQG will keep the boxy design that gives the G-Class a classic look but with some additional modern styling, at least if the concept version is anything to go by.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs. Kia EV9: battle of affordable electric SUVs
Kia EV9 GT-Line Three Quarters

The long-awaited Rivian R2 has finally been announced, and it's an excellent option for those who want an electric SUV that doesn't completely break the bank. Sure, the R2 isn't cheap -- but it's a whole lot cheaper than most other EVs out there, especially when it comes to SUVs. But Rivian isn't the only company trying to tackle the problem of the budget electric SUV. The Kia EV9 is finally available, and it too offers a modern design and a range of helpful features.

Given the fact that the Rivian R2 and Kia EV9 are two electric SUVs in a similar price range, you might be wondering which is better for your needs. That's why we put the Rivian R2 and the Kia EV9 head-to-head.
Design
Both the Rivian R2 and the Kia EV9 are actual SUVs -- not crossovers pretending to be SUVs, like plenty of other EVs out there. The two vehicles offer big, boxy designs and plenty of interior space, making them excellent options for families or those who need that extra storage.

Read more
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more