Skip to main content

Hold the phone! New study says talking and driving not as dangerous as we think

hold the phone new study says talking and driving not as dangerous we thought on

According to a joint study conducted by Carnegie Mellon University and the London School of Economics, cell phone use while driving may not be responsible for causing more automotive accidents on the road.

“Using a cellphone while driving may be distracting, but it does not lead to higher crash risk in the setting we examined,” said Saurabh Bhargava, assistant professor of social and decision sciences at CMU’s Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences, in a press release. “While our findings may strike many as counterintuitive, our results are precise enough to statistically call into question the effects typically found in the academic literature.”

Related Videos

Apparently, researchers examined calling and crash data from 2002 to 2005, before and after 9:00 p.m., a period of time, the study points out, when many mobile carriers offered plans allowing free calls on weekdays after 9 p.m.

Despite a seven percent hike in call volume at 9:00 p.m., an examination of approximately 8 million crashes across nine states and fatal crashes across the nation concluded that crash rates did not increase after that hour.

Simply put, researchers found that increased cell phone usage after that time period had no effect on crash rates.

What’s more, researchers also analyzed the effects of legislation banning cell phone use while driving in several states, and found no effect on crash rates either.

While the study provides answers that run counter to what many would consider common sense, namely that distractions like talking on the phone while driving will more than likely hamper an individual’s ability to focus entirely on the road, thereby increasing the risk of an accident, the research brings up an interesting point.

“One thought is that drivers may compensate for the distraction of cellphone use by selectively deciding when to make a call or consciously driving more carefully during a call,” Bhargava said. Suggesting that at the very least, policymakers should revisit the presumptive notion that talking on a cellphone and driving is as dangerous as it’s currently perceived.

However, Bhargava’s research partner at the London School of Economics, Vikram S. Pathania, was careful to add a cautionary note to all their findings, noting that “our study focused solely on talking on one’s cellphone. We did not, for example, analyze the effects of texting or Internet browsing, which has become much more popular in recent years. It is certainly possible that these activities pose a real hazard.”

Tell us your thoughts? Do you think blanket cell phone bans make sense, or should activities like texting and driving be banned, while talking is permitted? Tell us in comments.

Editors' Recommendations

The LAPD scores a patrol car fit for Rodeo Drive with its new Lamborghini Gallardo
LAPD Lamborghini Gallardo right

By now, every gearhead should know about the Dubai Police and its fantasy fleet of exotic cop cars, including a Lamborghini Aventador.
Sadly, U.S. police departments haven't had the resources for a publicity stunt like that. Until now.
Car and Driver reports that the Los Angeles Police Department now has a black-and-white Lambo to call its own and, no, parking fines in the City of Angels haven't been raised to historic highs.
That's because this Lamborghini Gallardo is on loan from Nathalie and Travis Marg, the owners of telecommunications contractor Light Source 1. It's police livery is a removable vinyl wrap, and presumably this supercar will get slightly better treatment than the LAPD's aging fleet of Ford Crown Victorias.
Like the Dubai Police's exotic-car collection, the LAPD Gallardo will be used for public-relations purposes, specifically charity events conducted by the LAPD air-support team. Its 5.2-liter V10 wouldn't be very useful in the city's notorious traffic, anyway.
Supercar spotters will also note that this isn't the latest and greatest Lamborghini. It's an early-model Gallardo, so it doesn't feature any of the cosmetic or performance enhancements different versions of Lambo's "entry-level" model received during its 10-year run.
Perhaps the LAPD will find a party willing to loan it a new 2015 Huracán LP610-4. Until then, a Lamborghini is still a Lamborghini.

Read more
Don’t get angry behind the wheel; your car might be watching your emotions
dont get angry behind wheel car might watching emotions 140899 2 1

Dozens of new cars watch the road ahead for impending collisions with cars, pedestrians, and other large mammals. Now, though, cars might just start watching you, too.
Volvo announced today that it is testing dashboard-mounted sensors that watch the driver for signs of fatigue or distraction.
Small LEDs emit beam infrared light onto the driver’s face so that the sensors can read facial cues in any condition.
Monitoring which direction the driver is looking or whether they’re falling asleep can help enhance Volvo’s existing safety systems, which monitor the road ahead. If your Volvo knows you’re not watching the road, it can more closely monitor for lane departures, etc.
The benefits of the technology don’t end there. Volvo foresees using these sensors to also recognize drivers, allowing for immediate and automated seat setting adjustments. Also, it can use facial cues and line of sight to adjust interior lighting.
Volvo isn’t the only automaker watching drivers, though. PSA Peugeot Citroën is working with Swiss scientists at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) to help prevent road rage with a similar infrared sensor set.
Unlike the Volvo system, the Peugeot system isn’t watching to see if you’re sleepy but rather if you’re furious by identifying seven universal emotions: fear, anger, joy, sadness, disgust, surprise, or suspicion.
“We know that in addition to fatigue, the emotional state of the driver is a risk factor,” the researchers said, according The Daily Mail, adding, “Irritation, in particular, can make drivers more aggressive and less attentive.”
Although the tests have encountered setbacks accurately identifying the way individuals display anger, the idea behind the study to prevent all forms of distracted driving – even anger.
While watching the driver might seem a bit creepy, it’s one of the final hurdles facing automakers in preventing accidents. But if you’re the kind of consumer who is worried about privacy, you might not want to buy a new car ever again.

Read more
Volvo envisions roads dotted with magnets to guide self-driving cars
volvo self driving cars use magnets to see the road ahead for

Volvo is known for safety fanaticism. And lately it's been focusing on the most unsafe part of most cars: the driver.
The Swedish carmaker's latest experiment with self-driving cars involves installing magnets in the road surface to help orient a car's robot brain.
A car needs to know where it is in order to navigate the environment, and Volvo believes allowing it to talk to the road is the most reliable and cost-effective way to to do that.
Unlike the GPS, cameras, and other sensors used in existing autonomous cars, it says road magnets aren't affected by physical obstacles or weather.
The ferrous magnets create an "invisible railway," giving the car a path to follow. Volvo says the system is accurate to within one decimeter, and has already been tested on a track at the company's facility in Hällered, Sweden.
In addition to the obvious safety benefits of a car that automatically stays in its lane, Volvo believes the system will make road use more efficient by allowing for smaller lanes, as well as more precise snow clearing in winter.
The company also says its magnet setup is relatively cheap. However, it would be interesting to see how well they hold up after years of use, especially on poorly-maintained roads.
This is the latest autonomous driving experiment for Volvo, which has already linked cars together into a robotic "road train", and demonstrated a self-parking car concept. It also plans to put 100 self-driving cars on the public streets of Gothenburg for a large pilot project.
We have a hard time believing, though, that reworking an entire country's roadway infrastructure is cheaper than cameras, lasers, and radar sensors. The U.S. alone has four million miles of roads. Rejiggering those to include magnets for cars to read would be a huge and costly undertaking.
America can't afford to keep the roads it has in decent shape. Adding magnets? Forget about it.

Read more