Skip to main content

The best just got (a tiny bit) better – Mazda reveals G-Vectoring Control

Mazda is a driver’s car company – that’s common knowledge. Across their lineup, Mazda consistently offers the best-handling cars in their classes. The company slogan is “Driving Matters,” and the people at Mazda walk their talk. Nowhere else in the industry will you find active amateur racers in key executive and engineering positions the way you see at Mazda.

So when an invitation comes in to visit Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca for some up-close time with both American and Japanese Mazda engineers, some track time, and some serious technical geekery, they don’t have to ask me twice.

This event was called the SKYACTIV Driving Academy, but the name is a bit misleading. We weren’t really there to hone our track chops, although we did get schooled by a couple of Mazda execs during the hot laps. We came to Monterey to learn about G-Vectoring Control, the latest improvement to the Mazda driving experience.

Using Data Wisely

Any modern car generates a tremendous amount of data. Sensors are everywhere, all feeding into the car’s central data channel. The car uses all this data to manage functions like stability and traction control, adaptive cruise control, and of course the engine and transmission.

What G-Vectoring Control will do is make the basic maneuvers of driving more confident.

What Mazda has been doing lately is figuring out how to use all that data to make their cars more responsive to driver input. It’s not obvious, but there are a few good examples.

Mazda’s predictive all-wheel-drive on its SUVs takes a lot of factors into account, such as steering angle, the beginnings of wheel slip, throttle position, and even the outside temperature and windshield wiper status. With all that data, the system can make a fast decision about how much power to send to front and rear wheels. All that data was already there, Mazda just uses it differently than other automakers.

Similarly, Mazda engineers started looking at how people steer their cars, and found that just a tiny change in the way their cars respond to steering inputs could make a key difference in stability, predictability, and overall driving dynamics.

How Your Car Turns Corners

Think about what happens when you turn your car’s steering wheel and head into a corner.  What you notice is that the side of the car on the inside of the corner tends to rise, and the outside tends to dip. Body roll happens because as you turn the wheel, the car’s inertia still wants to go forward, so much of the car’s body weight transfers to the outside tires. Similarly, when you apply the brakes, the car’s front end tends to dive a bit as body weight transfers to the front tires. Simple enough, right?

Forward weight transfer is a really good thing when you’re about to turn a corner, because it puts more weight and grip on your front tires at the moment they need to work to turn the car.

What Mazda has done is to look at driver steering inputs and use that data to make subtle changes that increase front wheel grip, keeping the car more stable and predictable, while at the same time protecting the car from jerky motions.

G-Vectoring Control

Mazda calls its new system G-Vectoring Control, and here’s how it works. The sensors on the steering system can detect when you move the wheel as little as 1/10th of one degree. Mazda’s new system takes that data and tells the engine to instantly reduce its torque output very slightly as you start to turn the wheel.

The amount of torque reduction is very small – about 0.05 percent of one G. For comparison, a typical street braking maneuver from 35 mph to a stop is about 50 percent of one G and a full-on panic stop can be up to 90 percent of a G or even higher, depending on the car you drive.

The effect of that small torque reduction is a forward weight transfer that puts just a few extra pounds of weight on the front tires. But even that tiny weight transfer is enough to make the car feel more planted and confident as you drive, especially on wet or icy pavement.

You Can Only Feel It If You Don’t Look For It

Let’s get one thing out of the way – G-Vectoring Control won’t save you if you charge into a hairpin corner at 80 mph and spin the wheel. If you do that, you’re going to be Isaac Newton’s bitch. What G-Vectoring Control will do is make the basic maneuvers of driving more confident. If you go jerking the wheel trying to feel the system working, you’ll miss it entirely.

Here’s how to see G-Vectoring Control at work: Get in a car that doesn’t have it and have a friend drive normally. Watch how many small steering adjustments the driver makes just to drive down a slightly curvy stretch of road. It happens more than you expect. When we all learn to drive, we also learn to make those adjustments automatically, so we ignore them.

Road-Rave-G-Vectoring-0010
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Then head over to your Mazda dealer and ask for a test drive in a 2017 Mazda6. The G-Vectoring Control system is coming to the entire Mazda fleet, but the Mazda6 is the first model to have it. Have your friend drive the same road at the same speed, and you’ll see far fewer adjustment motions. That’s the G-Vectoring Control system keeping the car pointed where you want it to go.

That may not sound like much, but it’s important. When the car responds to your steering inputs without drama, it’s easier to drive well. It’s easier to feel what the tires are doing, and it’s easier to drive the way you want to. That’s the real benefit.

How To Get G-Vectoring Control

Digest this info now because once you have a car with G-Vectoring Control, you don’t have to think about it. Mazda made this tech standard equipment, so you don’t have to pay extra for it, and there’s no on/off switch for it. The system just does its thing silently and invisibly under all conditions.

What you care about is that the Mazda6 (and all other Mazdas, eventually) will simply feel more connected to the road, more confident in slippery conditions, and smoother in turning. If good driving matters to you as much as it does to Mazda’s engineers, you’re going to love this feature.

Jeff Zurschmeide
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Jeff Zurschmeide is a freelance writer from Portland, Oregon. Jeff covers new cars, motor sports, and technical topics for a…
Jeep Compass EV breaks cover—but will it come to the U.S.?
jeep compass ev us newjeepcompassfirsteditionhawaii  4

Jeep just pulled the wraps off the all-new Compass EV, and while it’s an exciting leap into the electric future, there's a catch—it might not make it to the U.S. anytime soon.
This is a brand new electric version of the Jeep Compass, and being built on Stellantis' STLA platform—the same architecture underpinning models like the Peugeot E-3008 and E-5008—it looks much slicker and packs a lot more inside than previous versions of the Compass.
Let’s start with what’s cool: the new Compass EV is packing up to 404 miles of range on a single charge, a 74 kWh battery, and fast-charging that gets you from 20% to 80% in about 30 minutes. Not bad for a compact SUV with Jeep's badge on the nose.
There are two versions: a front-wheel-drive model with 213 horsepower and a beefier all-wheel-drive version with 375 horsepower. That AWD setup isn’t just for looks—it can handle 20% inclines even without front traction, and comes with extra ground clearance and better off-road angles. In short, it’s still a Jeep.
The design's been refreshed too, and inside you’ll find the kind of tech and comfort you’d expect in a modern EV—sleek, smart, and ready for both city streets and dirt trails.
But here’s the thing: even though production starts soon in Italy, Jeep hasn’t said whether the Compass EV is coming to America. And the signs aren’t promising.
Plans to build it in Canada were recently put on hold, with production now delayed until at least early 2026. Some of that might have to do with possible U.S. tariffs on Canadian and Mexican vehicles—adding a layer of uncertainty to the whole rollout.
According to Kelley Blue Book, a Stellantis spokesperson confirmed that the company has “temporarily paused work on the next-generation Jeep Compass, including activities at” the Canadian plant that was originally meant to build the model. They added that Stellantis is “reassessing its product strategy in North America” to better match customer needs and demand for different powertrain options.
So while Europe and other markets are gearing up to get the Compass EV soon, American drivers might be left waiting—or miss out entirely.
That’s a shame, because on paper, this electric Jeep hits a lot of sweet spots. Let’s just hope it finds a way over here.

Read more
Tesla just scrapped the Cybertruck range extender
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

The writing was pretty much on the wall for the Cybertruck range extender last month when Tesla removed the option from its website. Now, it’s officially scrapped it and is refunding the $2,000 deposits that customers put down for the $16,000 battery pack. 

“We are no longer planning to sell the range extender for Cybertruck," Tesla said in a message to customers on Wednesday, adding, "As a result, we will be refunding your deposit in full.”

Read more
Zoox recalls robotaxis after Las Vegas crash, citing software fix
zoox recall crash 1739252352 robotaxi side profile in dark mode

Amazon's self-driving vehicle unit, Zoox, has issued a voluntary safety recall after one of its autonomous vehicles was involved in a minor collision in Las Vegas. The incident, which occurred in April 2025, led the company to investigate and identify a software issue affecting how the robotaxi anticipates another vehicle’s path.
The recall, affecting 270 Zoox-built vehicles, was formally filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Zoox said the issue has already been addressed through a software update that was remotely deployed to its fleet.
Zoox’s robotaxis, which operate without driving controls like a steering wheel or pedals, are part of Amazon’s entry into the autonomous driving space. According to Zoox’s safety recall report, the vehicle failed to yield to oncoming traffic while making an unprotected left turn, leading to a low-speed collision with a regular passenger car. While damage was minor, the event raised flags about the system’s behavior in complex urban scenarios.
Establishing safety and reliability remain key factors in the deployment of the relatively new autonomous ride-hailing technology. Alphabet-owned Waymo continues to lead the sector in both safety and operational scale, with services active in multiple cities including Phoenix and San Francisco. But GM’s Cruise and Ford/VW-backed Argo AI were forced to abandon operations over the past few years.
Tesla is also expected to enter the robotaxi race with the launch of its own service in June 2025, leveraging its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. While FSD has faced heavy regulatory scrutiny through last year, safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration.
Zoox, which Amazon acquired in 2020, says it issued the recall voluntarily as part of its commitment to safety. “It’s essential that we remain transparent about our processes and the collective decisions we make,” the company said in a statement.

Read more