Skip to main content

Why 0 to 60 times don’t mean as much as you might think

2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat
2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat
Whether you read the review of the latest sports car or an argument in a car forum, you are likely to find 0 to 60 times prominently discussed. That’s because, along with horsepower, 0 to 60 has become the gold standard of car performance; it’s a convenient measure of acceleration and a seemingly good way to judge and compare cars from afar.

Unfortunately, 0 to 60 is about as relevant to the actual experience of driving performance cars as fuel economy. That’s because, not only is 0 to 60 a misleading measurement of performance, it does very little to describe the subjective experience of driving. And just because a car is quick to 60 doesn’t mean it’s a good car to drive.

The problem

How often does the average driver go from 0 to 60? I would wager almost never — and for good reason. In regular road driving, the only occasion where it is both legal and — more importantly – safe (and maybe not even then) to do this kind of hard acceleration is merging onto a freeway from a metered onramp.

If acceleration from a full stop is not relevant on the road, surprisingly, it is even less relevant to track driving.

If acceleration from a full stop is not relevant on the road, surprisingly, it is even less relevant to track driving. Instead — both on-road and on-track, acceleration from moderate speeds is far more significant. This is the type of acceleration used when passing another car on the highway or exiting a corner on the track. In actual driving, it’s one of the very few times that most drivers will actually use 100 percent of the throttle. On the track, specifically, this is where power really matters.

Importantly, this kind of acceleration requires very different qualities than acceleration from a dead stop. Take for example the Dodge Challenger Hellcat. This monster boasts a relatively slow 3.9 second 0 to 60 time in its manual form, in no small part because it is a heavy vehicle that struggles to put down all 707 horsepower through the rear wheels. Once at speed, weight and traction matter less than power and gearing, and there the Hellcat accelerates like few other cars can. In practice, this also feels much, much more fun, as we can explain by looking at a little parable.

The sensation

The Nissan GT-R and the Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT, both cars claim to be entry-level supercars, and both cost around $100,000. So it seems like we should be able to compare them on numbers.

2015 Nissan GT-R
2015 Nissan GT-R
2015 Nissan GT-R

On paper, there would seem to be no competition: the Nissan lists among its impressive fleet of performance specs a 0-to-60 time of just 3.0 seconds. That is frankly insane time, likely accomplished by rubbing the transmission down with cheetah blood. The GT-R’s time looks even more impressive compared to the Aston’s relatively anemic 4.6-second slog. I mean why even get out of bed for that?

If 0 to 60 times are ever helpful, they should be here. The difference between these cars isn’t a few fleeting tenths of a second. In fact, the gap between these two to 60 is so large that you don’t even have to be Commander Data to feel the difference. Here is the thing, though; when it comes to driving the two, the Aston feels faster.

It feels this way because the Vantage has been engineered as much for fun as outright speed. The engine noise, the vibration, and even the feel of the steering make the Aston’s acceleration more exciting. This is because, in the Aston, the driver is involved in the process.

2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT

As impressive as the GT-R is, and it is a tremendous technical achievement, driving it is antiseptic. The car’s onboard systems do so much that all the driver has to do is point it and hit the gas pedal. Driving it in real life is not that different from driving the digital version in Gran Turismo.

That doesn’t mean what you think it means

All of this aside, there is still the question of — shall we say — manhood measuring. Part of the appeal of 0 to 60 times is that they seem fixed and objective, perfect for shooting someone down in a car argument. After all, we can look at the times and say that a Corvette Z06 is faster than a Porsche 911, and is therefore better. It seems so clear cut.

Here is the problem, though; not only are the 0-to-60 measurements not regulated in any way, a single car might post very different times under different conditions.

First, the question of regulation. Most critical car statistics are the product of a single set of regulations. For example, fuel economy is measured by a set of rules laid down by a governing body, like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or European Union. In theory, this means consumers get objective, and equivalent measurements from all automakers. However, as Ford has shown with its fuel economy controversy, even regulations are no guarantee equality.

When it comes to manufacturer-tested 0 to 60 times, there are even more issues. It’s not that they lie, but only that each company’s test is likely to be a bit different. For starters, there are the procedures themselves. Decisions on how many runs to perform, whether or not to runs in multiple directions, and who’s in the driver’s seat can all have a big impact on final times … even before other factors are considered.

2015 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS
2015 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS
2015 Porsche 911 Carrera GTS

Environmental conditions like traction of test tracks, air pressure, and air temperature can have large effects on performance. For example, engineers who worked on the last-generation Cadillac CTS-V told me that on a chilly 45-degree day, the engine would be putting out about 30 more horsepower than it was officially rated. The result of all of these factors could be major distortions in listed 0 to 60 times.

Those distortions don’t even take into account real-world conditions. Take that Corvette Z06, a fantastic car, but a challenging one to launch off the line thanks to its rear-wheel drive powertrain. Average drivers will struggle to approach its listed 0 to 60 time of 3.1 seconds, even under perfect conditions with fresh tires. Those same drivers might be able to actually go faster in supposedly slower all-wheel drive cars like the Audi R8.

Adding it all up

So just what does all of this mean, are 0 to 60 times useless? Well, not quite. They remain and industry standard. And, while they can be misleading, they say a little bit about important factors like power-to-weight ratio. Moreover, they are far more accessible than more significant measurements like 40 to 70 mph acceleration figures. In that regard, we are probably stuck with them. However, the numbers shouldn’t be substitutes for the more nuanced evaluation of the car’s complete driving experience.

The aforementioned Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT is the perfect example of this point. By supercar standards it’s slow. Heck, it is only two tenths of a second faster to 60 than a $36,000 Subaru WRX STI. But we think it is one of the best driver’s cars on the market. The Aston’s greatness can be explained in part in numbers, but, mostly, the devil is in the details.

Editors' Recommendations

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
EV vs. PHEV vs. hybrid: What’s the difference?
BMW X5 PHEV charge port

When sizing up options for your next car, you may be figuring out whether to get an electric vehicle, only to discover there are a bunch of variations to consider -- not just hybrids, but plug-in hybrids, extended-range electric vehicles, and fuel cell electric vehicles are just some of the other categories. The depths of EV jargon run so deep that we wrote an entire EV glossary, but for now let's zero in on the difference between electric vehicles, hybrids, and plug-in hybrids. These options blend old tech and new tech in a way that's often practical, cheaper than an EV, and still more efficient than an old-school gasoline car.
What is an electric vehicle?
An electric vehicle skips the internal combustion engine found in most traditional cars in favor of an electric motor. This allows EVs to operate without needing gasoline. Instead, they're powered by an electric battery that will need to be charged regularly, either at your home or at a charging station like a Tesla Supercharger. The Ford Mach-E, Kia EV6, and Rivian R1S are all popular examples of modern EVs.

The electric motor works by way of a rotating magnetic field. Inside the motor, three electromagnets surround a free-floating rotor, which spins based on which magnet is attracting it most. That rotor in turn produces power to the wheels of the car and pushes it forward and backward. Regenerative braking reverses the relationship and turns motion into electricity. While you're slowing to a stop, the force of the turning wheels spins the rotor and generates a charge via the electromagnets in the motor, which in turn goes up into the battery for storage. If you're curious, you can dig into the nuts and bolts of how an electric vehicle works.
What's the difference between a hybrid and a plug-in hybrid?
In short, a hybrid primarily relies on gas with an electric backup, while a plug-in hybrid relies on electric power with a gas backup.

Read more
You’ll soon be able to watch YouTube videos in your Android Automotive car
Android Auto in a car.

Google is making a bigger play for the in-car infotainment system. At Google I/O 2023, the company took the wraps off of a series of improvements to both Android Auto and Android Automotive, allowing those who want Google-based services in their car to get more features and better account integration.

As a reminder, the two systems may have a similar (almost identical?) name, but are actually quite different. Android Auto essentially just projects content from your phone, whether through a wireless or wired connection. It's Google's answer to Apple's CarPlay, and doesn't work without your phone. Android Automotive, however, is a version of Android that runs in the car itself, as the car's main infotainment system. It works whether you have a connected phone or not. Collectively, Google refers to the systems as Android for Cars -- yes, yet another name.

Read more
Are EVs safe? From battery fires to autopilot, here are the facts
Lucid Air electric car

While many people will be primarily concerned with EV range before buying their first electric vehicle, others are a little nervous about having a giant lithium-ion battery strapped to their car's undercarriage. Those things can catch fire -- just ask Chevy Bolt owners. But how much of a real danger is that? And should it prevent you from buying an EV?
What safety features do EV batteries have?
The major safety issue with lithium-ion batteries is their temperature. If they get too hot, they're prone to igniting. If they get too cold, they freeze and permanently stop working. Charge and discharge rates need to be carefully regulated too, or you'll get electrical fires. Over time, small imperfections in a battery's structure can lead to short circuits and reduced lifetime.

EVs have what are called battery management systems (BMS) to keep tabs on all of these variables. The BMS will generate warnings when needed and intervene directly by cutting off power if things get out of hand. EV battery packs also have thermal management systems. Typically, this is a closed loop of liquid coolant flowing alongside the battery cells, but air cooling and welding battery cells directly to the car chassis are also means of mitigating extreme heat.
How well do EVs handle a crash?
Since there's no engine at the front of an EV, the hood typically houses a frunk -- meaning a front trunk. This acts as a large crumple zone in the case of a head-on accident. One crash in Germany avoided casualties thanks to this inherent characteristic of electric vehicles. Crash tests bear this out. Popular EVs like the Tesla Model 3, Hyundai Ioniq 5, and Nissan Leaf have all received overall five-star ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Read more