The line between Uber drivers as employees or contractors just got fuzzier. In a California court recently, a federal judge ruled that Uber can’t claim it has no liability for alleged sexual harassment by its drivers just because they’re contractors and not employees, as reported on BuzzFeedNews. One direct result may be more harassment claims from alleged victims.
The plaintiffs in the two cases in question were identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in court documents. Jane Doe 1 is the plaintiff in an assault case against a Boston Uber driver and Jane Doe 2 is the plaintiff who claims that her driver raped her. Both incidents occurred in 2015.
Related: Uber drivers are still contractors and the company will pay up to $100M in settlements
The judge dismissed “without prejudice” Jane Doe 1’s claim against Uber for “negligent hiring, supervision, and retention of her driver.” The same judge is allowing Jane Doe 2’s claims against Uber to continue. “Dismissal without prejudice” means the claim can be brought back to court. Therefore, neither ruling is in Uber’s favor. Uber sought dismissal with prejudice in each case, which would have closed the claims permanently.
One issue in the spotlight due to these cases is the incidence of rape and sexual assault complaints Uber has received. Uber revealed that five claims of rape and 170 sexual assault claims involving its drivers were entered into its customer service database between December 2012 and August 2015.
By denying Uber’s motion to totally dismiss its liability and involvement in these two cases, the judge opens the possibility of other lawsuits against the company.
- Ridesharing giant Uber’s rise has been meteoric, anything but trouble-free
- Google’s Waymo vs. Uber: Everything you need to know
- Explosive claims of illegal spying and hacking rock the Uber vs. Waymo trial
- More regulations are coming as EU rules that Uber is not simply an app
- Inside the hack Uber didn’t want 57 million users to know about