Skip to main content

Most Americans have access to 100Mbps Internet, but from just one source

100mbps internet widely available in us isp choice limited speed tests header  1
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The latest US broadband report issued by the Department of Commerce has found six out of ten Americans are theoretically covered by “very-high-speed” broadband service of 100Mbps or greater, which is not so bad. Well, the actual number is 59.4 percent of the United States population, so less than six out of ten. That’s short of South Korean perfection, but it’s still pretty good.

What’s troubling, though, is that less than eight percent can choose between two ISPs capable of offering 100Mbps. And a measly 0.9 percent have three very-high-speed options at their disposal. Hence, the steep prices that often drive people into the arms of slower DSL providers.

Speaking of slow, a tad over two percent of Americans can’t even download content at three megabits per second, which is the current basic broadband standard according to the FFC (and that will soon to be upped to 10Mbps). There are still people without access to “broadband” Internet of any sort.

On the bright side, choice is common in the low-speed Internet provider market, with at least a couple of three megabit services available to 88.3 percent of Americans. 56.2 percent live in an area covered by at least three such ISPs.

At the other end of the scale, gigabit Internet remains a Utopian fantasy for a huge chunk of the country – 97.4 percent. Needless to say the lucky 2.6 percent have little choice between providers, as competition in the gigabit market is virtually nonexistent. Google Fiber and AT&T GigaPower can’t spread soon enough, eh, speed junkies?

Topics
Adrian Diaconescu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Adrian is a mobile aficionado since the days of the Nokia 3310, and a PC enthusiast since Windows 98. Later, he discovered…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more