Skip to main content

The Radeon RX 490 is listed on an online retailer, and could be revealed soon

The RX 480.
Image used with permission by copyright holder
A listing of an unannounced Radeon RX 490 graphics card by AMD has appeared online. The hardware details aren’t provided, and the online retailer even lists the second half of 2016 as the release date. Given that we’re already into December, that launch window is still possible due to the company’s plans to provide a public event on December 13 for showcasing live demos of desktop processors based on its Zen CPU design. This could give AMD the opportunity to officially announce this card.

The deal with this listing is that it doesn’t say anything outside of it supporting CrossFire mode, a PCI Express 3.0 bus, and DirectX 12. However, that hasn’t stopped observers from assuming that the card is based on AMD’s upcoming Vega graphics chip design rather than the current Polaris architecture used in the Radeon RX 460, RX 470, and RX 480 cards now on the market.

Here are the unofficial hardware specs that have leaked thus far regarding the four Vega variants:

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!
  Vega 10 Vega 10 Dual Vega 11 Vega 20
Process node: 14nm FinFET 14nm FinFET 14nm FinFET 7nm FinFET
Cores: 4,096 8,192 2,304+ 4,096
Base clock: 1,465MHz 1,100MHz+ unknown 1,465MHz+
Boost clock: unknown unknown unknown unknown
Memory: 16GB HBM2 32GB HBM2 unknown 32GB HBM2
Memory bus width: 4,096-bit 4,096-bit x2 unknown 4,096-bit
Memory bandwidth: 512GB per second 1TB per second unknown 1TB per second
Thermal design power: 225 watts 300 watts unknown 150 to 300 watts
Performance: 12 TFLOPS 18 to 23TFLOPS unknown 12 TFLOPS

What doesn’t make sense is the idea that AMD would introduce a new graphics chip architecture in the Radeon RX 400 series. Presumably AMD would launch a whole new series of cards based on its Vega design for the high-end “enthusiast” PC gaming market while the Radeon RX 400 Series continues to feed the general PC market. That said, the image provided in the RX 490 listing (which looks to be the RX 480) is undoubtedly a placeholder, and the product could easily be based on AMD’s dual-GPU Polaris 10 design that’s slated to arrive this month.

We don’t know much about the dual version of Polaris 10, only that it’s expected to have a performance of 11 TFLOPS, a base clock speed of 1,200MHz, and around 4,608 cores. Like the rest of the Polaris lineup, the dual version will be based on 14nm process technology that uses fin-shaped FinFET transistors.

The Radeon RX 490 listing shows up after reports surfaced regarding a Pro 490 model slated for Apple Mac Pro computers. Like the consumer model, this card is supposedly based on AMD’s Vega graphics chip design, too, and is scheduled to arrive in May 2017. AMD previously stated that cards based on its Vega design won’t arrive until the first quarter of 2017, so the Radeon Pro 490 rumor makes more sense than the rumored consumer-focused RX 490 launch window.

Here are a few alleged numbers comparing the performance of the Radeon Pro 490 against Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1070:

Radeon Pro 490 Geforce GTX 1070
3DMark FS Ultra: 5,000 4,529
3DMark FS Extreme: 9,490 8,966
3DMark FS Time Spy: 6,510 5,749

The thing to keep in mind is that AMD typically releases Pro variants of their cards after the consumer models hit the streets. If that’s the case here, then AMD appears to be still on target to release Vega-based RX models in the first quarter of 2017 followed by the Pro versions in the second quarter. But, as always, everything here is mere rumor, assumption, and “leaks” until AMD officially flashes us with its Vega-based goodness. Hopefully we’ll get a glimpse in a few weeks.

Editors' Recommendations

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs. RX 7900 XT: AMD’s monster GPUs, compared
RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT on a pink background.

The long-awaited RX 7000 series has finally arrived, or more specifically, AMD's two top-end GPU flagships have. The 7900 XT and the 7900 XTX are set to go head-to-head with the Nvidia RTX 4080, although they may not keep up with the RTX 4090.

Given how different the 4080 and 4090 are from each other, you might wonder if the same thing is going on with the 7900 XT and the 7900 XTX. Here's everything we know so far.
Pricing and availability

Read more
What power supply do you need for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX?
Radeon logo on the RX 7900 XTX.

Upgrading your graphics card can sometimes mean upgrading your power supply too, especially if it's one of the latest generations of flagship cards, like the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. If you want to make sure everything's smooth and stable, it's best to check whether your current PSU can handle the upgrades provided by AMD's new range of GPUs, dubbed RDNA 3 or Radeon RX 7000.

So far, the new GPU range only has two cards: the RX 7900 XTX and the 7900 XT. Out of those two, the RX 7900 XTX is the one that consumes the most power. Even then, it's still fairly conservative when compared to the Nvidia flagship, the RTX 4090. In Nvidia's case, the Founders Edition has a total board power (TBP) of 450 watts and calls for an 850-watt PSU. However, some of Nvidia's board partners that made custom versions of the GPU require a much beefier PSU, reaching as high as 1,200 watts.

Read more
AMD Radeon RX 7000 series: Everything we know about the RDNA 3 GPU
An AMD RX 6000 graphics card with the Radeon branding.

While many gamers are currently scoring some great discounts on the AMD Radeon RX 6000 series graphics cards, the next generation is already here. The Radeon RX 7000 series arrives with two graphics cards for a start: the RX 7900 XTX and the RX 7900 XT. It is a powerful upgrade that will make it even more competitive against rival Nvidia's GeForce cards.

Here's everything we know about AMD's new flagships, including our own tests that show how they compare to Nvidia's RTX 4080 and RTX 4090.
Release date

Read more