Skip to main content

AMD ships 16-core Opteron CPUs

AMD Opteron 6200 (hand)
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The industry has been talking about them for over a year, and AMD itself held up the launch briefly, but they’re finally here: AMD is now shipping its first 16-core Opteron 6200 CPUs. Codenamed Interlagos, the 16-core units are aimed at the high-end server market, where density, multithreading, and processor efficiency matter most. But the technology puts pressure on other chipmakers like Intel to keep up, and raises the ante from AMD’s earlier 12-core efforts. The 16-core Opterons are 25 to 30 percent faster than than their 12-core predecessors, and use about half the power of their predecessors per core, enabling server and data center customers to pack the same processing power in about two-thirds the rack space.

“Our industry is at a new juncture; virtualization has provided a new level of reliable consolidation and businesses are now looking to the cloud for even more agility and efficiency,” said AMD corporate VP and general manager for commercial business Paul Struhsaker, in a statement.

Linux and Windows Server 2008 can already be extended to handle 16 cores per processor, and the systems offer distinct advantages to services running heavily threaded applications or relying heavily on virtualization technology. The chips run at speeds between 1.6GHz and 2.6GHz, consume between 85 and 140 watts of power each, and have per-chip prices ranging from $523 to $1,019.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Server systems from HP, Acer, Dell, IBM, and supercomputing giant Cray will be among the first to sport the 16-core Opterons. In fact, Cray has just announced a deal with the University of Illinois National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA—the same place that essentially gave birth to Web browsers) to build a supercomputer for the NCSA’s Blue Waters project. That system will have more than 235 Cray XE6 cabinets based on AMD’s 16-core Opteron 6200-series CPUs, complemented by more than 30 cabinets with a still-in-development Cray XK6 supercomputer based on Nvidia Tesla GPU processors. The system will be used for a variety of engineering and science applications and should push more than a petaflop when complete — and there’s nary an Intel chip in sight. The U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Lab is also building another AMD/Nvidia hybrid supercomputer with Opteron 6200s, and that one should manage over 20 petaflops when it’s complete. That would be considerably faster than Japan’s K supercomputer, currently ranked the world’s fastest at 8 petaflops.

The Opteron 6200 announcement comes immediately on the heels of AMD announcing it would be cutting some 1,400 jobs in a cost-cutting move designed to firm up the company’s bottom line. AMD’s worldwide share of the processor market sunk to an estimated 5.5 percent during the second quarter of 2011, according to IDC.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AMD is making the CPU more and more obsolete in gaming
A demo of AMD GPU work graphs featuring in-game scenery including a castle and a town.

At GDC 2024, AMD just expanded on Microsoft's recently announced Work Graphs API, and a quick demo shows just how powerful the new tech can be for gaming performance. AMD's iteration moves draw calls and mesh nodes from the CPU to the GPU, cutting back on the time it takes to execute these tasks. As a result, AMD found that there was a massive performance improvement -- rendering time saw a 64% boost -- when using Work Graphs with mesh shaders.

Microsoft introduced Work Graphs as a way to streamline processes both in gaming and in productivity, all by giving the GPU the power to schedule and execute tasks without first communicating with the CPU. It's built into the Direct3D 12 API and it can reduce bottlenecks and improve gaming performance in 3D games.

Read more
Nice try, Intel, but AMD 3D V-Cache chips still win
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor.

Intel's freshly released Core i9-14900KS processor is advertised as the fastest CPU in the world, but does that mean AMD can never hope to compete, even with its flagship Ryzen 9 7950X3D? Not at all. Each CPU has its merits, and both are insanely powerful in their own right. At this price point and at this performance level, making the right choice is tricky.

Let's zoom in and find out how the Core i9-14900KS and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D stack up against each other, what they excel at, and which one is the better option to buy.
Pricing and availability

Read more
I compared all of AMD’s V-cache CPUs to see which you should buy
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor.

AMD's Zen 4 3D V-Cache CPUs are true marvels of modern CPU performance. They offer exceptional gaming performance on par with the absolute best that Intel has to offer, and yet do it at a fraction of the power draw and heat output. They lose out on productivity performance, but that's what the non-X3D AMD CPUs are for. And if you want all-rounders, but don't mind high thermal design power (TDP) ratings, then Intel's offerings are always an option.

But out of the latest generation of X3D CPUs, which is the best? The 7950X3D is the most expensive with more cores, while the 7800X3D is the gaming darling. And what about the option between those two, the 7900X3D? Let's find out.
Pricing and availability

Read more