Skip to main content

The buttonless Apple mouse was an accident

apple updating magic mouse and wireless keyboard could be coming soon
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sometimes the biggest innovations come not from a group of creative minds pitting their energies to create a single product but by pure chance. At times, even pure accident.

From hit songs to scientific breakthroughs and countless inventions, many things today exist despite initially being half-baked or seen by their creators as blunders.

If an interview conducted with a former Apple engineer is any indication, you can put the buttonless Apple mouse in the “came about by accident” column.

Speaking with Cult of Mac, Abraham Farag, the former Apple Senior Mechanical Engineer of Product Design, shone a light on how the button-free Apple mouse came to be when a few Cupertino staff members laid out a bunch of proposed designs for a new desktop mouse back in 1999.

“It all started with a model we did not have time to finish,” Farag told Cult of Mac. “We had made six of these great form models to show Steve. They were fully done, with all the parting lines cut in for buttons and different plastic parts, and all the colors just right.”

But at the 11th hour, the engineers who worked on these proposed designed opted to add to the mix. There was just one problem: it wasn’t completely hashed out, and the team didn’t have time to outline where the buttons on that prototype would be.

Farag and the crew weren’t exactly proud of their creation. “It looked like a grey blob,” he said. “We were going to put that model into a box so people wouldn’t see it.”

Then Steve Jobs showed up to the meeting and everything changed.

“Steve looked at the lineup of potential forms and made straight for the unfinished one,” Farag says.

“That’s genius,” Jobs said. “We don’t want to have any buttons.”

Someone in the room chimed in with: “That’s right, Steve. No buttons at all.”

The rest is history.

You can check out the full interview with Abraham Farag here.

Editors' Recommendations

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
4 monitors you should buy instead of the Apple Studio Display
The Dell Ultrasharp 27 4K monitor on a table.

The Apple Studio Display got a lot of heat when it launched, but it's actually quite a high-quality monitor. Colors are great, and it's very bright, topping out at 560 nits in my own testing. Even the built-in webcam and speakers are excellent. There aren't many full-featured 5K monitors out there quite like it.

The problem has always been the $1,600 price tag, and there's just no getting around that. So with that in mind, here are four monitors that you should consider buying instead.
Samsung 27" ViewFinity S9 5K Smart Monitor (S27C900PAN)

Read more
Apple quietly backtracks on the MacBook Air’s biggest issue
The MacBook Air on a white table.

The new MacBook Air with M3 chip not only allows you to use it with two external displays, but it has also reportedly addressed a storage problem that plagued the previous M2 model. The laptop now finally has much faster storage performance since Apple has switched back to using two 128GB NAND modules instead of a single 256GB module on the SSD drive.

This was discovered by the YouTuber Max Tech, who tore down the entry-level model of the MacBook Air M3 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. In his tests, thanks to the two NAND modules, the M3 MacBook Air is nearly double faster than the M2 MacBook Air. Blackmagic Disk Speed tests show that the older M2 model with the problematic NAND chip had a 1584.3 Mb/s write speed, and the newer M3 model had 2108.9 Mb/s for the M3 model, for a 33% difference. In read speeds, it was 1576.4 Mb/s on the old model and 2880.2 Mb/s on the newer model.

Read more
Here’s why the Vision Pro succeeded where the Apple Car failed
Apple Car rendering from Vanarama.

Everywhere you look, the failure of Apple’s secret self-driving car is dominating the news. Yet, it comes shortly after another moonshot project -- the Vision Pro -- launched to higher-than-expected initial sales. Why did one crash and burn while the other was successfully brought to market?

Well, Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman has attempted to answer that question in his latest Power On newsletter, which claims that the Apple Car (known internally as Project Titan) was “doomed nearly from the start.” In the end, there are many reasons for its failure that the Vision Pro was able to navigate its way around.

Read more