Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Versus

Finally, a MacBook Pro rival that has what it takes

Add as a preferred source on Google
The keyboard and lid of the ProArt P16.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

Apple’s MacBook Pro 16 sits alone as the best content creation laptop you can buy today. It’s faster, more efficient, and better-built, and it has an awesome mini-LED display. It’s also very expensive, and of course it runs macOS.

That leaves an opening for a more affordable machine running Windows. Enter the Asus ProArt P16, which offers its own compelling advantages including good performance, a lovely OLED display, and attractive pricing. Is that enough to dethrone the best?

Recommended Videos

Specs and configurations

  Asus ProArt P16 Apple MacBook Pro 16
Dimensions 13.97 inches x 9.72 inches x 0.59-0.68 inches 14.01 inches x 9.77 inches x 0.66 inches
Weight 4.08 pounds 4.8 pounds
Processor AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Apple M3 Pro (12-core)
Apple M3 Max (14-core, 16-core)
Graphics AMD Radeon 890M
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070
Apple M3 Pro (18-core)
Apple M3 Max (30-core, 40-core)
RAM 32GB
64GB
18GB (M3 Pro)
36GB (M3 Max 14/30)
48GB (M3 Max 16/40)
64GB (M3 Max 16/40)
96GB (M3 Max 14/30)
128GB (M3 Max 16/40)
Display 16.0-inch 16:10 4K+ (3840 x 2400) OLED, 60Hz 16.2-inch 16:10 Liquid Retina XDR (3456 x 2234), 120Hz
Storage 1TB SSD
2TB SSD
512GB SSD
1TB SSD
2TB SSD
4TB SSD
8TB SSD
Touch Yes No
Ports 1 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2
1 x USB-C USB4
2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
1 x HDMI 2.1
1 x 3.5mm audio jack
1 x SD card reader
3 x USB-C 4 with Thunderbolt 4
1 x HDMI 2.0
1 x 3.5mm audio jack
1 x SD Card reader
Wireless Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3
Webcam 1080p with infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition 1080p
Operating system Windows 11 macOS Monterey
Battery 90 watt-hour 100 watt-hours
Price Buy at Best Buy Buy at Amazon
Rating 4.5 out of 5 stars 4.5 out of 5 stars

The ProArt P16 comes in a handful of configurations. The base model is $1,900 with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 370 HX chipset, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060, and a 16-inch 4K+ OLED display. It’s $2,700 with 64GB of RAM, a 2TB SSD, and an RTX 4070.

The MacBook Pro 16 starts at $2,499 with an M3 Pro chipset, 18GB of RAM, a 512GB SSD. and a 16.2-inch 3456 by 2234 mini-LED display. Upgrading to an M3 Max ups the price by $1,000, while increasing RAM to 36GB and storage to 1TB. At the very high end, the MacBook costs a whopping $7,199 with the fastest M3 Max, 128GB of RAM, and 8TB of storage.

Simply put, the ProArt P16 is a lot more affordable.

Design

Apple MacBook Pro 16 front angled view showing display and keyboard.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The MacBook Pro 16 enjoys Apple’s fastidious design sensibilities, sharing the same simple yet elegant aesthetic and favors cohesiveness over ostentation. In short, it’s a gorgeous laptop that’s available in two colors, Silver and Space Black. The ProArt P16 is more pedestrian, with an all-black chassis and lines and angles that are more reminiscent of the typical laptop today. It’s not that the Asus isn’t attractive, it’s that it just doesn’t rise to the same level.

The same can be said about each laptop’s build quality. The MacBook Pro 16’s chassis is constructed from a single chunk of CNC machined aluminum. It and the lid are rigid, without any bending, flexing, or twisting. Its heft gives it a solid feeling that few laptops can duplicate. The ProArt P16 is also made of aluminum, but while its chassis and keyboard deck are reasonably rigid, the lid gives in to light pressure. The ProArt P16 feels plenty well built, but the MacBook is, again, on another level.

I don’t mean to pile on, but the MacBook’s Magic Keyboard is also better, primarily because of its snappier, more consistent switches. Both have large keycaps and plenty of key spacing, but the Magic Keyboard affords faster and more accurate typing. The MacBook’s huge Force Touch haptic touchpad is also much better than the ProArt P16’s smaller mechanical version. When it comes to entering data and navigating the UI, the MacBook Pro 16 is a better experience.

In terms of connectivity, both are mixed bags. The ProArt P16 has more legacy ports, but its single USB4 port provides less bandwidth than the MacBook Pro 16’s three Thunderbolt 4 ports. Both have HDMI, and both have full-size SD card readers. The ProArt P16 has more up-to-date wireless.

Both also have similar 1080p webcams, and both provide good images for videoconferencing. The ProArt P16 uses an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition, while the MacBook Pro 16 has a fingerprint reader embedded in the power supply.

Performance

Apple MacBook Pro 16 downward view showing keyboard and speaker.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

The ProArt P16 is built around AMD’s latest chipset, the 28-watt Ryzen AI 9 370 HX with 12 cores and 24 threads. It’s a fast iteration of AMD’s Ryzen series, while incorporating the fastest neural processing unit (NPU) available running at 50 tera operations per second (TOPS). In addition, the ProArt P16 can be equipped with either the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 or RTX 4070 GPU. We reviewed it with the RTX 4070.

The MacBook Pro 16 uses either Apple’s M3 Pro or M3 Max chipsets. The M3 Pro has 12 CPU cores and 18 GPU cores, while the M3 Max comes in 14-core CPU/30-core GPU and 16-core CPU/40-core GPU variations. Our review used the fastest M3 Max.

Simply put, when equipped as we reviewed them, the MacBook Pro 16 is much faster than the ProArt P16. That’s most apparent in the Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark that utilizes several M3 Max CPU optimizations compared to the Windows version relying more on the GPU to speed things up. The only area where the ProArt P16 is faster is in gaming, where the MacBook is mostly held back by a dearth of modern titles that can take advantage of its GPU.

However, it’s important to note that a more comparable MacBook Pro 16 in terms of price will use the M3 Pro. That will make performance a lot closer.

Geekbench 6
(single/multi)
Handbrake
(seconds)
Cinebench R24
(single/multi/GPU)
Pugetbench
Premiere Pro
Asus ProArt P16
(Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 / RTX 4070)
Bal: 2,688 / 14,497
Perf: 2,690 / 14,455
Bal: 50
Perf: 49
Bal: 114 / 1,165 / 11,184
Perf: 114 / 1,208 / 11,421
Bal: 5,444
Perf: 6,451
Apple MacBook Pro 16
(M3 Max 16/40)
Bal: 3,083 / 20,653
Perf: 3,119 / 20,865
Bal: 50
Perf: N/A
Bal: 140 / 1,667 / 13,146
Perf: N/A
Bal: 8,046
Perf: N/A

Display

The Asus ProArt PX13 creator laptop showcase at Computex 2024.
Kunal Khullar / Digital Trends

Here, we’re pitting OLED against mini-LED. That means we’re comparing OLED’s inky black and incredibly dynamic and accurate colors against mini-LED’s incredible brightness and high dynamic range (HDR) performance.

It’s a pretty intense battle. The ProArt P16’s OLED display is sharper at 4K+ (3840 by 2400) compared to the MacBook Pro 16’s 3456 by 2234 resolution. And the MacBook’s display also runs at up to 120Hz, making for a smoother experience.

According to our colorimeter, the ProArt P16’s OLED display isn’t even close to as bright, and both have deep contrast. But its colors are wider and slightly more accurate, and its blacks are perfect without the blooming effect that sometimes shows up with mini-LED.

Really, both displays are excellent for productivity users and creators. The MacBook Pro 16, though, has the best HDR in a laptop today thanks to its incredible HDR brightness that’s up to 1,600 nits.

Asus ProArt P16
(OLED)
Apple MacBook Pro 16
(mini-LED)
Brightness
(nits)
359 640
AdobeRGB gamut 98% 89%
 sRGB gamut 100% 100%
DCI-P3 gamut 100% 100%
Accuracy
(DeltaE, lower is better)
1.0 1.22
Contrast ratio 25,110:1 22,150:1

Portability

Asus Pro Art P16 left side view showing ports.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

Both laptops are very close in size in width and depth, although the MacBook Pro fits in a slightly larger display thanks to smaller display bezels. Both are close to the same thickness, but the MacBook Pro 16 is considerably heavier. It will weight you a down a bit more than the ProArt P16.

Battery life, though, is a more significant differentiator. The ProArt P16 lasted for 8.5 hours in our web browsing test and 11 hours in our video looping test. That’s not bad for Windows creator laptops. However, the MacBook Pro 16 lasted for 19.5 hours and 27 hours, respectively. It’s the longest-lasting laptop we’ve tested.

Part of the difference comes from the MacBook Pro 16’s larger battery. Most, though, comes from the incredible efficiency of Apple’s M3 architecture. The MacBook will last you longer both when pushing it hard and when doing typical productivity tasks and media consumption.

The ProArt P16 is a great option for Windows users

The lid of the ProArt P16 on a box.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

Look, it’s simple: the MacBook Pro 16 remains the best 16-inch laptop around. It’s incredibly fast, it has awesome battery life, its build quality is second to none, and its mini-LED display is hard to beat. And it has a price tag to match.

The ProArt P16 is also pretty fast, it’s considerably lighter, and it has a great OLED display. It’s also a lot more affordable. If you’re a Windows user with MacBook envy, then the ProArt P16 is the go-to option.

Mark Coppock
Former Computing Writer
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
Look, the MacBook Neo is a fine machine for building apps. And yes, I am utterly surprised
I am talking about apps with a generous dose of AI wizardry happening in the background.
MacBook Neo in yellow.

In a span of just one week, I have built a full-fledged Android app for my Galaxy Z Fold 8 foldable phone, three Mac apps, and an iPhone app. And here's the fun part. The entire journey of creating these apps actually started on a phone, jumped to my MacBook Neo, compiled just fine, and ran flawlessly, without making me want to tear my hair off. The latest example? 

It built my calendar-clipboard hybrid app in Terminal within 20 seconds, and an on-device transcription app with a retro look in roughly 15 seconds. I used to think building desktop software would have me burning the midnight oil. The MacBook Neo did it in less time than I can pour myself a can of soda and take the first sip. 

Read more
AI could be doing to our tolerance for hard work what social media did to our patience
Even brief AI use may make unaided work feel more frustrating once the help disappears.
ChatGPT on iPhone

It is no secret that social media, and especially the rise of short-form content, has played a major role in the declining patience many of us have for anything that takes too long to get to the point. A few seconds without something interesting happening is enough to make us swipe away and look for the next thing. AI appears to be doing something similar to the way we approach work.

A new peer-reviewed study found that people who used AI for around 10 to 15 minutes were more likely to struggle and give up once the AI was taken away. The researchers ran three randomized experiments with 1,222 participants who were given math and reading-comprehension tasks. AI helped them perform better at first, but their performance tanked once they had to solve the problems on their own.

Read more
Microsoft wants Copilot Notebooks to handle the work that comes after an AI answer
Built-in Office editing gives users somewhere to revise what Copilot produces
Copilot graphics

Microsoft is bringing Office editing into Copilot Notebooks through its Frontier preview. Users can work on Word, Excel and PowerPoint files alongside their project references, making changes themselves or asking Copilot to handle them.

Generating a report or presentation with AI still leaves someone responsible for getting it ready to share. The October update puts editing tools where that work begins, though having a document neatly formatted doesn’t make its contents correct.

Read more