Skip to main content

FBI finally warns private businesses about snooping KeySweeper devices

The FBI’s Cyber Division is just now getting around to warning the private industry about a fake USB device charger that can log the keystrokes of certain wireless keyboards. The government is talking about KeySweeper, which was first revealed as a proof-of-concept attack platform by Samy Kamkar 15 months before the FBI’s current notification. Kamkar used a USB-based phone charger in his demonstration to show how this platform could reside anywhere and steal/decrypt keystrokes from any Microsoft-branded wireless keyboard in the vicinity.

“If placed strategically in an office or other location where individuals might use wireless devices, a malicious cyber actor could potentially harvest personally identifiable information, intellectual property, trade secrets, passwords, or other sensitive information,” the FBI warns. “Since the data is intercepted prior to reaching the CPU, security managers may not have insight into how sensitive information is being stolen.”

Recommended Videos

According to Kamkar, the fake wireless device charger can use an internal battery, allowing it to sniff and log Microsoft wireless keyboard transmissions even when its unplugged from the wall and seemingly shut off. Collected data can be stored locally on a flash-based chip too, or sent over a GSM-based cellular network like AT&T and T-Mobile. Two KeySweeper devices can even exchange information wirelessly, and there’s a web-based tool for live keystroke monitoring as well.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The sneaky KeySweeper device created by Kamkar featured a 3.3v Arduino Pro Mini microcontroller, a nRF24L01+ RF chip that communicated using GFSK over the 2.4GHz band, and an AC USB charger for converting AC power to 5v DC. Optional components include an SPI Serial Flash chip for storing keystrokes, the Adafruit FONA board for using a 2G SIM card, and a 3.7v LiPo or LiOn battery for power when disconnected from a wall outlet.

KeySweeper’s primary code resides on the microcontroller while live monitoring of wireless keyboards is enabled by way of a web-based backend. This backend provides a web interface and uses PHP and JQuery to log all keystrokes. He also modified the Adafruit FONA library that enables the FONA to detect a new text message, and created a JQuery Terminal plugin that makes keyboard monitoring easier.

Microsoft wireless keyboards use a proprietary 2.4GHz RF protocol. To figure out the actual wireless language, Kamkar ripped apart a Microsoft wireless keyboard and examined the chip responsible for its wireless connectivity. He bought the exact same chip off eBay, and later began to build the actual USB charger device, as shown in a step-by-step tutorial here. Essentially, just about anyone can build this device on the cheap.

In his proof-of-concept, Kamkar reveals that his invention will send SMS alerts when the target wireless keyboard broadcasts specific keystrokes, such as the URL to a bank. He also acknowledges that KeySweeper is actually an extension of work previously done by Travis Goodspeed, and work by Thorsten Schroder and Max Moser.

Why the FBI has waited until now to warn the private industry about KeySweeper is unknown. However, the agency points out that the Microsoft wireless keyboards subject to keystroke sniffing are manufactured before 2011, but are still currently on the market to purchase. Kamkar claims that his device can sniff out any Microsoft wireless keyboard transmission, so private companies should keep an eye out for suspicious wireless chargers lounging around no matter what year the Microsoft keyboard was made.

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
I saw Google’s Gemini AI erase copyright evidence. I am deeply worried
Gemini Advanced on the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold.

The rise of generative AI has been a fairly messy process, especially from fair usage ethics and copyright perspective. AI giants are inking deals with publishers to avoid legal hassles, while at the same time, they are embroiled in copyright tussles in courts in multiple countries.
As the ravenous appetite for training AI on user data grows, we might be in for another ethical conundrum. Multiple users on X and Reddit have shared demonstrations of how Google’s latest Gemini 2.0 series AI model can remove watermarks from copyright-protected images.
Going by the before/after samples of images, it seems Gemini is doing a fairly good job of removing the watermarks. Notably, it’s not only erasing those banner-style watermarks, but also fairly complex overlays with design and stylized text elements.
https://x.com/ajiteshleo/status/1901484196972945872?s=61
The model in question is the Gemini 2.0 Flash, which was released earlier this year and got a reasoning upgrade, as well. It is worth noting here that you can not remove the watermark if you are using the mobile or desktop version of the Gemini 2.0 Flash model. Trying to do so returns a message like this:
“Removing watermarks from images without the explicit permission of the copyright holder is illegal in most countries. It is important to respect the copyright laws and intellectual property rights. If you want to use an image with a watermark, you should contact the copyright holder and ask for permission.”
You can, however, try and remove the watermark from images in the Google AI Studio. Digital Trends successfully removed watermarks from a variety of images using the Gemini 2.0 Flash (Image Generation) Experimental model.
 
It is a violation of local copyright laws and any usage of AI-modified material without due consent could land you in legal trouble. Moreover, it is a deeply unethical act, which is also why artists and authors are fighting in court over companies using their work to train AI models without duly compensating them or seeking their explicit nod.

How are the results?
A notable aspect is that the images produced by the AI are fairly high quality. Not only is it removing the watermark artifacts, but also fills the gap with intelligent pixel-level reconstruction. In its current iteration, it works somewhat like the Magic Eraser feature available in the Google Photos app for smartphones.
Furthermore, if the input image is low quality, Gemini is not only wiping off the watermark details but also upscaling the overall picture. .
https://x.com/kaiju_ya/status/1901099096930496720?s=61
The output image, however, has its own Gemini watermark, although this itself can be removed with a simple crop. There are a few minor differences in the final image produced by Gemini after its watermark removal process, such as slightly different color temperatures and fuzzy surface details in photorealistic shots.

Read more
More RTX 50-series price hikes show scalpers aren’t the only problem
The RTX 5090 sitting on a pink background.

Nvidia's RTX 50-series faced many problems upon launch. Now, six weeks later, those problems are still present, with the main issue being pricing and availability. Unfortunately, it's not just scalpers that are racking up the prices: Asus just raised the prices of some of its best graphics cards by hundreds of dollars, leaving the MSRP in the rearview mirror.

No matter the GPU you search for in the Asus Store, you'll be hard-pressed to find one actually selling at MSRP. That, in itself, isn't strange. Asus, being Nvidia's and AMD's board partner, makes its own versions of GPUs, and those cards often come at a premium due to things like more overclocking headroom or superior cooling. So, a higher price is to be expected, although AIBs should still offer a couple of models at MSRP.

Read more
Europe wants to get in on big tech — here’s why that could be good for everyone
big tech logos around capitol hill

Old friendships have been feeling unstable lately, and this is forcing the EU to reconsider its reliance on non-European tech infrastructure. To get things moving, over 80 signatories representing around 100 organizations have signed an open letter to the president of the European Commission, urging the EU to increase support for local alternatives to big tech products, services, and infrastructure.

So, what will happen if Europe decides to go self-sufficient on the tech front and create its own "Euro Stack"? How will it affect both Europeans and other people around the world? Well, they say competition is good for everyone, and I'm inclined to agree. More European tech would mean more competition for American tech, and more competition means better products for consumers.

Read more