Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Researchers say your GPU could expose private info online

Add as a preferred source on Google

In an age of increased online privacy awareness, many of us are conscious of our digital fingerprints and prefer not to be tracked. However, it may not be as simple as it previously seemed.

An international team of researchers has found that users can be tracked down by their graphics cards. This is done through a new technique referred to as “GPU fingerprinting.”

An example of the GPU fingerprinting technique.
An example of the GPU fingerprinting technique showcasing two identical GPUs that still produce different results. Image used with permission by copyright holder

This new technology, named DrawnApart by the researchers and first reported by Bleeping Computer, relies on the tiny differences between each piece of hardware in order to make a distinction that ties it to a certain user. Through a series of identifiers, researchers find that they are able to track down individual users, as well as their online activity, just by implementing this new technique.

Recommended Videos

The team spans several countries and universities, including researchers from Israel, France, and Australia, who published their findings online in a paper on Arxiv.org. They showcased examples of the GPU fingerprinting technique, which relies on the fact that no components are exactly the same — even if they are all part of the same model and were made by the same manufacturer.

There are tiny differences in the performance, power consumption, and processing capabilities of every graphics card. DrawnApart takes advantage of that by using fixed workloads based on the Web Graphics Library (WebGL). This is a cross-platform JavaScript-based application programming interface (API) responsible for rendering graphics within any compatible web browser.

Using WebGL, DrawnApart targets the GPU’s shaders with a special sequence of graphic operations that were made specifically for this task. The drawing operations are ultra-precise and make it easier for the researchers to tell the graphics cards apart, and this includes cards of the same make and model.

Once the task is complete, the technique produces an accurate trace with timing measurements that includes how long it takes the card to handle stall functions, complete vertex renders, and more. As the timing is individual to each GPU, this results in making the unit trackable.

DrawnApart tracking duration diagram.
DrawnApart: Average tracking time by collection period graph. Image used with permission by copyright holder

The research team finds that this technique provides a high degree of accuracy and is an improvement over existing tracking methods. The algorithm was tested on a large sample of more than 2,500 unique devices and 371,000 fingerprints, and the researchers noted a 67% improvement compared to using only current fingerprinting methods without DrawnApart. In its current state, DrawnApart can fingerprint a graphics card in just eight seconds.

Eight seconds is ultrafast as it is, but there is potential for even more accurate and quicker tracking through the use of newer, faster APIs. The team tested using compute shader operations instead and found that the results were now up to 98% accurate and only took 150 milliseconds to achieve.

Although the findings are impressive, it’s impossible to deny that they’re also terrifying. We’ve all grown used to declining cookies on various websites, but DrawnApart proves that may soon not be enough. The research team is also keenly aware of the potential for misuse that the GPU fingerprint poses.

“This is a substantial improvement to stateless tracking, obtained through the use of our new fingerprinting method. […] We believe it raises practical concerns about the privacy of users being subjected to fingerprinting,” said the researchers in their paper.

As the GPU fingerprinting technique may not require additional permissions, users could be subjected to it by simply browsing the internet. Khronos, the organization in charge of the WebGL library, is already exploring ways in which to prevent the technique from being used maliciously.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
Apple’s busy month could see another batch of new devices in late October
More macs, updated HomePod mini, refreshed iPad mini, the long-awaited smart home hub, and more.
Apple-TV-4K

Apple's Fall launch slate for 2026 is looking absolutely stacked. The company has already lifted the covers from next-generation Mac hardware, alongside new iPhones, AirPods, and a couple of updated smartwatches. But it seems the company has a lot more to show before the year comes to an end.

It was recently reported that the company has set the date for an event on October 13, where it could reveal updated Apple TV hardware, its long-awaited smart home hub device, and a refreshed HomePod mini. Now, a fresh rumor claims that the companty has a second batch of product reveals lined up for late October.

Read more
Wikipedia says rogue OpenAI agents attacked its platforms and hammered its servers
Wikimedia says rogue OpenAI agents probed its services, made unauthorized edits and generated millions of requests, raising fresh concerns about AI agents and the open web.
OpenAI website open on MacBook

OpenAI's AI agents have been busy, and not in a good way. They have already hacked Hugging Face, and the company is under probe for hacking an Australian government website. In June, its agents swamped a United Nations website with search requests, then used pushy tactics to access its data. 

Now, the Wikimedia Foundation has revealed that these "rogue" agents paid Wikimedia’s website, including Wikipedia a visit too. Wikimedia launched its own probe and confirmed that OpenAI's agents had been active on its platforms without permission. The good news is that they didn't manage to breach any systems or data.

Read more
Some Googlebook features are off-limits if your phone is stuck below Android 17
Googlebook does not require Android 17 to work, but you’ll miss several major phone-connected features without it.
ASUS Googlebook 14

Googlebooks are finally here, and one of its biggest selling points is how closely it works with your Android phone. However, there is one catch - you need Android 17 for some of the most useful cross-device features.

Which Googlebook features need Android 17?

Read more