Skip to main content

Intel “forgot” to mention its 28-core CPU demo was bogus

insecure intel exploits ceo
Intel CEO, Brian Krzanich Intel

Remember that 28-core high-end-desktop CPU that Intel wowed everyone with at Computex? It was supposed to be capable of running at 5GHz and offer performance that was leaps and bounds ahead of its previous top-tier offerings in the Core i9 series. It turns out that chip was based on server hardware and was heavily overclocked to hit that kind of frequency.

That might be excusable if it hadn’t required a phase change cooler with a power rating that could be measured in horsepower to keep it running at manageable temperatures. But here’s the real kicker: According to Tom’s Hardware’s report on the matter, Intel claims it “forgot” to tell the crowds about the kind of cooling and aftermarket enhancement that such a chip would require to hit the levels of performance it displayed on stage.

Because of that cooler and the server-grade CPU that this “new” design is said to be based on, it may have required as much as 2,300 watts of power just to turn the system on, making it laughably unfeasible for anything but that very specific show debut. Considering the reveal of this supposedly groundbreaking design appeared to be cobbled together and tacked on the end of Intel’s stage show, its timing just before AMD’s own Threadripper 2 reveal is incredibly suspect.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Whether it was an attempt to take the wind out of AMD’s Ryzen 2 sails though doesn’t matter, because if anything Intel’s announcement made AMD’s even more exciting. Theadripper 2 has up to 32 cores and though we don’t know the clock speeds, they should be higher than the first-generation as all Ryzen 2 chips have been. It may not be 5GHz on all cores, but 4.5GHz on some is certainly feasible.

Most importantly though, those chips are real and definitely coming this year. Dell told us in a recent media briefing that it already planned to use Threadripper 2 chips in Alienware desktops in 2018. First generation Threadripper CPUs are competitive with Intel’s offerings that cost more than twice as much; Threadripper 2 could break new boundaries of consumer performance.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 1950X Review
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

With Intel’s best effort being a prototype processor that’s far from release, AMD could be poised to take the ultimate CPU performance crown in the next few months. Intel will certainly offer stiff competition and likely better gaming hardware in the mid to high end of the consumer space, but AMD Threadripper 2 is currently poised to steal the top spot for high-end desktops and power users.

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
Gamers are reportedly returning Intel Core i9 CPUs in droves
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's recent Core i9 CPUs are facing some dire issues, at least according to a new report from ZDNet Korea. In speaking with the outlet, an anonymous source in Korea responsible for customer service on Intel CPUs says that customers are returning more than 10 of Intel's 13th-gen and 14th-gen Core i9 CPUs daily, largely hailed as some of the best gaming processors you can buy.

The problem centers around Tekken 8, at least in Korea. According to the report, gamers using a CPU like the Core i9-13900K or Core i9-14900K will face an error message saying "not enough video memory" when launching the game, forcing it to close. This is even when the PC has plenty of video memory to run the game.

Read more
Intel’s new CPU feature boosted my performance by 26% — but it still needs work
The Intel Core i9-14900K slotted in a motherboard.

A 26% increase in frame rates from your CPU sounds far-fetched. If that's not enough to catch the attention of PC gamers, I don't know is. But trust me -- according to my own testing -- that's exactly what Intel's Application Optimization, or APO, delivers.

What started as a niche feature only supported by Intel's flagship chip and two games has since been broadened, with unofficial support for older CPUs and a much longer list of titles.

Read more
The only Intel CPU you should buy is over a year old
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

While it's true that Intel has no shortage of top-notch CPUs, there's only one you should really be buying in 2024 for gaming purposes, and it's well over a year old. It's not that the other CPUs are bad -- it's that this processor is quite unmatched in terms of performance per dollar, and it's more than good enough for most uses.

The CPU in question is the Intel Core i5-13600K. You might be tempted to buy something pricier, perhaps even something as over the top as the Core i9-14900KS. But I'm here to tell you that you really don't need to. And if you'd rather spend even less, I'll show you my favorite alternatives.
A value pick
Intel's Core i5 series is typically the one to target in terms of value, but there's usually a gap between the midrange i5 and the enthusiast i7. While that gap is still present in this generation, it's nowhere near big enough for you to have to worry about it if all you're looking for is gaming.

Read more