Skip to main content

Intel’s Arc Alchemist GPU should have Nvidia and AMD worried

Intel finally lifted the curtain on its discrete Arc Alchemist graphics cards in a special livestream on Wednesday. The first cards showing up are specifically for laptops, and they’re from the lowest class of GPUs Intel is offering. From what little we know right now, though, they should have Nvidia and AMD worried.

Before getting to performance, let’s look at the Arc Alchemist mobile range.

A chart shows specs for Intel Arc Alchemist mobile graphics cards.

As was anticipated based on rumors about Arc Alchemist, Intel is leading the launch with its Arc 3-class GPUs. There are two models here, both targeting thin and light laptops that need a discrete graphics card. Intel highlighted the Samsung Galaxy Book 2 as one of the first models available (it was unintentionally shown off ahead of the announcement).

Moving up the range, there’s the Arc 5 and Arc 7, which will arrive in early summer. The flagship A770M chip could be targeting Nvidia’s RTX 3080 Ti mobile. Both come with 16GB of memory and a 256-bit bus, which hints at how high Intel’s range may go. Intel hasn’t made that comparison, however.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Intel says Arc 3 GPUs are competing with cards like the RX 6500M and RTX 3050. In practice, that means gaming at 1080p with medium settings, targeting at least 60 frames per second (fps). Intel’s first-party benchmarks show that 60 fps at 1080p is possible with Arc 3 GPUs.

A chart shows benchmarks for Intel Arc Alchemist graphics cards.

We always recommend waiting for third-party benchmarks before drawing any conclusions about performance. Intel’s tests are enticing, though, showing respectable performance in even demanding titles like Hitman 3 and Doom Eternal

Compared to Nvidia’s mobile offerings, Intel is taking an interesting approach with Arc Alchemist. Nvidia allows laptop designers a range of power limits for its graphics cards, which makes a huge difference in performance. That’s why the RTX 3080 Ti in the Gigabyte Aero 16 doesn’t perform as well as the one in the MSI Raider GE76. Intel is offering a range as well, but the company clarified that the listed specs are for the lowest graphics power possible. That means most cards should run faster than Intel’s listed specs.

Like the desktop range, all Arc Alchemist mobile graphics cards support hardware ray tracing, variable rate shading, and Intel’s XeSS upsampling technology. XeSS isn’t coming at launch, however; despite revealing new games that will support the feature, like Ghostwire Tokyo and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Intel said the feature won’t arrive until early summer.

Along with the graphics cards themselves, Intel announced more details about the software supporting them. Intel Arc Control is a one-stop shop for drivers, tuning, and game settings, according to Intel. It functions as an overlay, similar to Nvidia GeForce Experience. Unlike GeForce Experience, however, Arc Control doesn’t require users to log in.

It’s mainly a vessel for drivers, but Intel said Arc Control will also show performance data about your system and provide tools for streamers. You can stream directly from the software and use A.I.-enhanced camera features like background blur, background replacement, and auto framing. Intel also said users can adjust performance here with desktop graphics cards, suggesting that there will be controls for overclocking.

The first Intel Arc Alchemist laptops are available to purchase today, and Intel says several more models will release before the other cards arrive this summer.

Editors' Recommendations

Jacob Roach
Senior Staff Writer, Computing
Jacob Roach is a writer covering computing and gaming at Digital Trends. After realizing Crysis wouldn't run on a laptop, he…
I’ve reviewed every AMD and Nvidia GPU this generation — here’s how the two companies stack up
Three graphics cards on a gray background.

Nvidia and AMD make the best graphics cards you can buy, but choosing between them isn't easy. Unlike previous generations, AMD and Nvidia trade blows point-for-point in 2024, and picking a brand to go with isn't as easy as counting the dollars in your wallet.

I've reviewed every graphics card AMD and Nvidia have released this generation, comparing not only raw performance, but also features like DLSS and FSR, ray tracing performance, and how VRAM works in modern games. After dozens of graphics card reviews, here's how AMD and Nvidia stack up against each other in 2024.
Nvidia vs. AMD in 2024

Read more
Intel’s next-gen GPU might be right around the corner
The Intel logo on the Arc A770 graphics card.

Intel's next-gen Battlemage graphics cards have already been caught in shipping -- but not to actual customers. Prolific hardware leaker @momomo_us shared shipping manifests that list two Battlemage GPUs sent through the mail at the "Pre QS" stage of development. Still, it's definitely a sign that Intel's hotly-anticipated Battlemage GPUs are moving along.

Read more
Don’t buy a cheap GPU in 2024
AMD RX 7600 on a pink background.

I wouldn't spend less than $500 on a new graphics card in 2024. I understand that budget is out of the question for many PC gamers, and I'm not advocating for higher GPU prices going forward. But with the games available today, it just doesn't make sense to settle for a budget GPU that will struggle the moment you take it out of the box.

We got a taste of the problem last year with games like The Last of Us Part One, Resident Evil 4, and Hogwarts Legacy, and the issue is cropping back up again with Horizon Forbidden West. I'm talking about VRAM in modern GPUs. At this point, you're much better off saving up for a more expensive GPU, waiting until the next generation arrives, or digging deep on last-gen options.
Why are you buying a new GPU?
If you pay attention to PC hardware reviews -- particularly the YouTube megamind of reviewers -- you probably already have a sour taste in your mouth for 8GB graphics cards. I get it. I don't agree that 8GB GPUs are completely obsolete, however.

Read more