Skip to main content

Time has run out for Intel's 'tick-tock' CPU production plan

intel apollo lake cpus pentium celeron launched intelhq
Shutterstock
Intel is set to abandon the tick-tock methodology that has shaped its processor manufacturing for the last decade. An annual report made public this week suggests that the company will instead transition to a three-stage process that seems poised to slow the release of new product cycles.

The tick-tock model is built around a system of delivering improvements to manufacturing process technology and micro-architecture in an alternating pattern; the former being referred to as a tick, and the latter being a tock. The schedule has been in place since 2007.

Recommended Videos

This strategy allowed Intel to assert dominance in the field of processors, with each new iteration either providing a major leap forward in technology, or major refinements over the previous model. However, due to the difficulties of maintaining such forward momentum, especially on the manufacturing side, the company is being forced to change its tactics.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Intel is planning to extend the lifespan of its 10nm and 14nm process technologies to three-stage release schedule of process-architecture-optimization, according to the latest annual investor report from the company. At present, this shift is only being discussed in relation to those two processes, but it seems likely to be extended further into the future.

The company’s own explanation of the change in its annual report is as follows:

“We expect to lengthen the amount of time we will utilize our 14nm and our next-generation 10nm process technologies, further optimizing our products and process technologies while meeting the yearly market cadence for product introductions.”

The change in direction comes after years of speculation among industry analysts regarding how long companies can continue aggressive down-sizing of silicon manufacturing. Many difficulties arise as transistors become smaller, and there’s presumably a physical limit to how small they can become. In 2011, for example, Intel started to use 3D transistors, as traditional planar transistors encountered power leakage problems that drastically reduced efficiency on Intel’s cutting edge (for 2011) 22nm production process.

It remains to be seen whether Intel’s change of tactics will allow the firm to maintain its hold over this portion of the computing industry. There’s major competition waiting in the wings from the likes of IBM, Samsung, and TMSC. These companies will leapfrog Intel in production technology if current trends hold.

Brad Jones
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Intel just gave up on a plan it laid out years ago
An Intel executive holding a Lunar Lake CPU.

Intel is giving up on its 20A node, or at the very least, it won't show up in any desktop processors. Intel announced that it would shifting resources away from developing 20A toward its smaller 18A node. Intel 20A was the foundation of Intel's upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs. The company says it's now using "external partners" to create Arrow Lake chips, which will likely be chipmaker TSMC.

We first heard about the 20A node in 2021, where the then-new CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out a road map detailing how Intel would move off its storied 14nm node onto smaller manufacturing processes. You could read this shift to 18A as Intel jumping forward to more exciting future technology, but it doesn't bode well given Intel's long-standing road map. The release of 20A was supposed to start the "Angstrom era," as Intel called it, where we would move beyond measuring transistor size in nanometers.

Read more
Intel ‘disgustingly’ rejected some faulty CPU returns, YouTuber says
Intel processors next to each other.

Intel has finally broken its silence on the instability issues plaguing 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs over the last few months, but it seems we've only gotten a half answer to the problem. Gamer's Nexus posted a video breaking down what the YouTube channel called "Intel's biggest fuckup" to date and showcasing how the problem goes beyond the reasoning Intel shared this week.

If you're not up to speed, Intel posted a message on its forums pinning blame for instability on improper voltage requests within the CPU microcode. Basically, the processor was getting improper power, leading to instability and degradation within the CPU. That's not the only problem with 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, however. Some CPUs are impacted by a manufacturing defect that isn't fixable with a microcode update, and Intel didn't address that in its public statement.

Read more
Intel responds to reported laptop CPU instability problems
msi gt77 titan 2023 review 19

Update: Intel has provided Digital Trends with the following statement about CPU instability affecting mobile processors:

"Intel is aware of a small number of instability reports on Intel Core 13th/14th Gen mobile processors. Based on our in-depth analysis of the reported Intel Core 13th/14th Gen desktop processor instability issues, Intel has determined that mobile products are not exposed to the same issue. The symptoms being reported on 13th/14th Gen mobile systems – including system hangs and crashes – are common symptoms stemming from a broad range of potential software and hardware issues. As always, if users are experiencing issues with their Intel-powered laptops we encourage them to reach out to the system manufacturer for further assistance."

Read more