Skip to main content

CPU owners are suing Intel. Here’s the surprising reason why

Promotional image of an Intel Core desktop processor.
Intel

Five unhappy owners of Intel CPUs have just started a class action lawsuit against the company following the discovery that, allegedly, Intel knowingly sold processors affected by a dangerous vulnerability — and it has been doing this for years. The flaw in question is called Downfall, and while it doesn’t affect Intel’s best CPUs, it’s present in chips ranging from the 6th to the 11th generation of Intel processors.

Recommended Videos

Dating back to Skylake CPUs and still present in Rocket Lake chips, the Downfall vulnerability was first made public by security researcher Daniel Moghimi. This flaw targets the Gather Instruction process in Intel CPUs. Normally, this allows the CPU to quickly access various data in its memory, but unfortunately, this also means that any vulnerabilities within Gather Instruction grant the threat actor a lot of access to the affected PC. Be it through malware or by direct access, attackers could potentially steal a lot of sensitive data from affected chips.

Intel issued a patch to prevent the bug, but it came at a huge cost. As reported by Tom’s Hardware, downloading the patch slowed down AVX2 and AVX-512 workloads by up to 50%. This left users stuck in a lose-lose situation where they could either make themselves vulnerable to Downfall or patch the CPU and suffer from the performance loss. The plaintiffs disagree with this approach from Intel and are now demanding a jury trial at the U.S. District Court in San Jose.

First reported on by The Register, the class action suit has five plaintiffs who own one of the chips that are affected by Downfall. According to the suit, Intel was made aware of the vulnerability all the way back in 2018, when Intel was already dealing with other threats, namely Spectre and Meltdown. Third-party researchers prepared vulnerability reports about the yet-unnamed downfall back then, finding a flaw within the AVX instruction set in a similar manner to Spectre and Meltdown.

Alexander Yee, a hardware enthusiast, prepared a write-up about the flaw in 2018 and delayed publishing it until August 7, 2018, reportedly at Intel’s request. Due to this, the plaintiffs believe that Intel should have addressed Downfall in 2018 when it was first informed about the flaw instead of proceeding to sell the chips as-is.

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger delivers the Day 1 closing keynote at IAA Mobility.
Intel

“Despite promising a hardware redesign to mitigate speculative execution vulnerabilities during the exact time period researchers disclosed the vulnerabilities in Intel’s AVX instructions, Intel did nothing. It did not fix its then-current chips, and over three successive generations, Intel did not redesign its chips to ensure that AVX instructions would operate securely when the CPU speculatively executed them,” says the complaint.

The document also talks about the five affected plaintiffs, with one person in particular saying that she “would not have purchased her Intel CPUs at the price she paid had she known about the defect described in this Complaint.”

The complaint also outlines what the plaintiffs are after: “Intel’s affected CPUs — billions of them — are to this day defectively designed, and Intel has instituted no recall, implemented no repair program, and provided no plan to fix the underlying design defect. Plaintiffs seek damages and equitable relief.”

Intel has declined to comment on these allegations thus far. It’s hard to say where this can go, and with these CPUs being a few generations old by now, they’re hard to find in stores at this point. However, those who already own them still face a difficult choice: To update or not to update? Intel itself recommends updating, but if you often use your CPU to run AVX2 and AVX-512 workloads, you might experience severe drops in performance.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
Intel’s CPU lineups might get even more confusing
An Intel Core Ultra Series 2 chip embedded in a piece of glass.

Intel's list of processors constantly grows, and its whole new naming scheme just got even more confusing. Today's leaks imply that Intel might be working on another Raptor Lake refresh, this time under the Core 200 name. That's right -- just Core 200, without the Ultra. We also spotted some more budget-friendly, previously unheard-of Arrow Lake chips.

With Intel Arrow Lake right around the corner and Lunar Lake CPUs freshly out and available, Intel's got a lot going on in the CPU department right now, and there's more to come. Some non-Ultra Core 200 chips appeared in various Business Applications Performance Corporation (BAPCo) benchmarks, including the Core 7 250U, the Core 7 250H, and the Core 5 220H. There's also the Core 7 Ultra 255H, which is likely an upcoming Arrow Lake-H CPU set to appear inside next-gen laptops.

Read more
I grilled Intel about its massive stability problem — here’s what it told me
intel instability unanswered questions dt respec

Intel is in trouble. We've known there was a problem for months, but the true scope of the issue is coming into focus. Intel has finally said a microcode update that will solve the instability problem is on the way, but it won't be here for several weeks. It's not much of a resolution, either -- I still have a lot of questions about Intel's instability problem, and how it plans to address the issue going forward.

I've sent the list of questions below to Intel for a response, and in cases where Intel has responded, I'll provide the exact quote. We've definitely seen some shifty communication from Intel regarding the instability issue up to this point, so I'll fill in the gaps if there's anywhere Intel wasn't able to provide a solid answer.
How will this impact performance?

Read more
Intel ‘disgustingly’ rejected some faulty CPU returns, YouTuber says
Intel processors next to each other.

Intel has finally broken its silence on the instability issues plaguing 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs over the last few months, but it seems we've only gotten a half answer to the problem. Gamer's Nexus posted a video breaking down what the YouTube channel called "Intel's biggest fuckup" to date and showcasing how the problem goes beyond the reasoning Intel shared this week.

If you're not up to speed, Intel posted a message on its forums pinning blame for instability on improper voltage requests within the CPU microcode. Basically, the processor was getting improper power, leading to instability and degradation within the CPU. That's not the only problem with 13th-gen and 14th-gen CPUs, however. Some CPUs are impacted by a manufacturing defect that isn't fixable with a microcode update, and Intel didn't address that in its public statement.

Read more